Mafia 56: Scout Camp

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
flash2015
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:55 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1241 Post by flash2015 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:35 pm

You are very active this game, Bob, especially at night. Why the change? I had a plumbing emergency at home...so this wasn't my highest priority. Not that I like to be especially active this early in the game anyway.

I know that both worcej and chaqa were both obstinate about the massclaim. I didn't like it either. Usually you get townclears from a massclaim, don't you? What townclears do we have now? Unfortunately once the massclaim started there was no stopping it.

I think worcej is his usual obstinate towny self. I don't believe worcej should have told us his partner, but again this is worcej being worcej. Chaqa's late move on the massclaim was definitely anti-town, but I can't see the scum motivation for it. It just made him a target and almost got himself lynched. If he is scum why would he take that risk, especially so early in the game?

damo666
Posts: 20271
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1242 Post by damo666 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:48 pm

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 12:35 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 8:50 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:35 am


I still can't see huge town benefits to the massclaim. I opposed it on principle aswell as on statistics. Out all of our PRs for an 5% increase in chance of hitting scum and then out their exact roles for a further 3% increase on two of them? Not great figures.
Where this numbers came from? Could you explain them?
Well we start with a 25% chance of lynching scum (5/20). Then we split them into PR and VT, with the most likely split (and the one everybody talked about) 3/10 VT and 2/10 PR. 3/10 is 30% which is a rather unimpressive 5% increase on 25%. For the numbers to turn out better at all, we are then forced to assume all PRs claim roles and mafia get CCd. It was assumed by pretty much everyone that mafia would CC the A/B roles for a larger pool, giving 1/3, which is 33%, a 3% increase on 30%. This was all assuming the expected scenario literally everyone was quoting, so don't even try to get up me for it.
You are neglecting that people have info.

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1243 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:51 pm

flash2015 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:35 pm
You are very active this game, Bob, especially at night. Why the change? I had a plumbing emergency at home...so this wasn't my highest priority. Not that I like to be especially active this early in the game anyway.

I know that both worcej and chaqa were both obstinate about the massclaim. I didn't like it either. Usually you get townclears from a massclaim, don't you? What townclears do we have now? Unfortunately once the massclaim started there was no stopping it.

I think worcej is his usual obstinate towny self. I don't believe worcej should have told us his partner, but again this is worcej being worcej. Chaqa's late move on the massclaim was definitely anti-town, but I can't see the scum motivation for it. It just made him a target and almost got himself lynched. If he is scum why would he take that risk, especially so early in the game?
Well, I had quite a bit of time on my hands today (perhaps more than I'll have for the rest of the game) so I decided to make use of it by making sure I read everything and replied to anything I thought worthwhile. Four hours later, that resulted in a lot of posts. At least now you have plenty of information to go on.

As for you. I'm glad you're back at last. Of course, if your toilet is flooding (or whatever) it's probably best to leave mafia to the side for a bit.

You may be right about Chaqa. It is entirely possible he just hated the massclaim so much he refused to have anything to of with it, or something like that. He did have his argument about taking his role to the grave though, so he knew he could probably hold on on being lynched. Still, perhaps not as scummy as I thought it was.

damo666
Posts: 20271
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1244 Post by damo666 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:52 pm

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 12:36 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 12:35 pm
D1 bussing is a thing that some people would do.
There, see. Jamie says so, it must be a thing. So why exactly is this game an exception to D1 bussing?
For a start we 'know' that at least 3 of the voters are town

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1245 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:53 pm

damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:48 pm
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 12:35 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 8:50 am


Where this numbers came from? Could you explain them?
Well we start with a 25% chance of lynching scum (5/20). Then we split them into PR and VT, with the most likely split (and the one everybody talked about) 3/10 VT and 2/10 PR. 3/10 is 30% which is a rather unimpressive 5% increase on 25%. For the numbers to turn out better at all, we are then forced to assume all PRs claim roles and mafia get CCd. It was assumed by pretty much everyone that mafia would CC the A/B roles for a larger pool, giving 1/3, which is 33%, a 3% increase on 30%. This was all assuming the expected scenario literally everyone was quoting, so don't even try to get up me for it.
You are neglecting that people have info.
What kind of info, and what info that wouldn't already exist regardless of the massclaim?

damo666
Posts: 20271
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1246 Post by damo666 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:57 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 11:50 am
I'm trying to get my head around the pressure for a mass claim.

@Damo: Why did you claim so early, when there was no consensus?

@Vecna: Why did you pretend that you felt forced into massclaiming and suggest that a lot of people had claimed already when, in fact, you were just the third person to claim?
I thought it advantageous (agreeing with Bozo) with the game set up and wanted to force the issue. Two reasons:
i) increase town's chance of winning
ii) promote post game discussion about mass claiming [I actually don't like it and think set ups should be 'proofed' to ensure mass claiming does not give either side a big advantage before going live]

damo666
Posts: 20271
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1247 Post by damo666 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:03 pm

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:53 pm
damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:48 pm
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 12:35 pm

Well we start with a 25% chance of lynching scum (5/20). Then we split them into PR and VT, with the most likely split (and the one everybody talked about) 3/10 VT and 2/10 PR. 3/10 is 30% which is a rather unimpressive 5% increase on 25%. For the numbers to turn out better at all, we are then forced to assume all PRs claim roles and mafia get CCd. It was assumed by pretty much everyone that mafia would CC the A/B roles for a larger pool, giving 1/3, which is 33%, a 3% increase on 30%. This was all assuming the expected scenario literally everyone was quoting, so don't even try to get up me for it.
You are neglecting that people have info.
What kind of info, and what info that wouldn't already exist regardless of the massclaim?
You are looking from the outside, not the inside.

I think the fact you are not in a townhead pov adds to your scumitudinesity.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33939
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1248 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:09 pm

damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:57 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 11:50 am
I'm trying to get my head around the pressure for a mass claim.

@Damo: Why did you claim so early, when there was no consensus?

@Vecna: Why did you pretend that you felt forced into massclaiming and suggest that a lot of people had claimed already when, in fact, you were just the third person to claim?
I thought it advantageous (agreeing with Bozo) with the game set up and wanted to force the issue. Two reasons:
i) increase town's chance of winning
ii) promote post game discussion about mass claiming [I actually don't like it and think set ups should be 'proofed' to ensure mass claiming does not give either side a big advantage before going live]
I do not like it either and I will enjoy that post-game discussion.

For now, as someone who thinks it advantageous to town, could you explain two things to me?

First of all, why you are convinced it is advantageous to town, and

Second of all, why it is best for town if people only claim Vanilla / Not Vanilla, as you have all done in this case? Usually a massclaim, in a setup where (a) the specific roles are known, and (b) where the setup favours a massclaim as you state this one does, it is customary for people to be asked to claim their actual roles, not just "I am a PR" or "I am not a PR".

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33939
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1249 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:10 pm

damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:03 pm
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:53 pm
damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:48 pm


You are neglecting that people have info.
What kind of info, and what info that wouldn't already exist regardless of the massclaim?
You are looking from the outside, not the inside.

I think the fact you are not in a townhead pov adds to your scumitudinesity.
Surely the scum are the ones on the inside as they have more information?

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1250 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:19 pm

damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:03 pm
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:53 pm
damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:48 pm


You are neglecting that people have info.
What kind of info, and what info that wouldn't already exist regardless of the massclaim?
You are looking from the outside, not the inside.

I think the fact you are not in a townhead pov adds to your scumitudinesity.
When I ask you to explain, I expect an explanation, not a veiled nonsensical answer complete with a scumread on me. I will ask again, what extra information do we have that would not exist if we hadn't massclaimed?

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1251 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:22 pm

It also happens to be past midnight now, so I'm going to bed. I won't be answering anything in my sleep, just be aware.

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1252 Post by Vecna » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:26 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:09 pm
damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:57 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 11:50 am
I'm trying to get my head around the pressure for a mass claim.

@Damo: Why did you claim so early, when there was no consensus?

@Vecna: Why did you pretend that you felt forced into massclaiming and suggest that a lot of people had claimed already when, in fact, you were just the third person to claim?
I thought it advantageous (agreeing with Bozo) with the game set up and wanted to force the issue. Two reasons:
i) increase town's chance of winning
ii) promote post game discussion about mass claiming [I actually don't like it and think set ups should be 'proofed' to ensure mass claiming does not give either side a big advantage before going live]
I do not like it either and I will enjoy that post-game discussion.

For now, as someone who thinks it advantageous to town, could you explain two things to me?

First of all, why you are convinced it is advantageous to town, and

Second of all, why it is best for town if people only claim Vanilla / Not Vanilla, as you have all done in this case? Usually a massclaim, in a setup where (a) the specific roles are known, and (b) where the setup favours a massclaim as you state this one does, it is customary for people to be asked to claim their actual roles, not just "I am a PR" or "I am not a PR".
Jamiet, I appreciate you replacing in, but itd be great if we can stop discussing massclaim now.

one full day of that is more than enough

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1253 Post by Vecna » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:27 pm

And its not like scum cant come up with reasons why its one way or the other, so it really doesnt help in reading people. Theres a reason scum love to hide behind mechanics.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25701
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1254 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:05 pm

as a GM the first thing I do as soon as I make a fun setup, I ask myself who will fuck this up doing something stupid?

If you make a role madness setup with a ton of PR, those PR will want to claim and of course you have to protect scum from autoloss as a gm. thats why you do semi open, or sequential rolemadness or nonstatic undefined PR that can be either align.

enough game theory banter, what was your chat with macca like, bob?

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25701
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1255 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:09 pm

vecna why do you keep acting shocked by things I say.

this is you this game

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy ... UITk3Rk-vA

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1256 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:24 pm

Sooo many pages for night. 😔

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25701
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1257 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:27 pm

Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:24 pm
Sooo many pages for night. 😔
The norm for webdip hit a tipping point in the M40's where post volume increased. It wasnt bb who topped 100 posts a phase anymore at that point. In some instances up to 9 people post 100 messages a phase or more

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25701
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1258 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:27 pm

Im in favor of ending night discussion entirely. its not a thing most places

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1259 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:27 pm

Hellenic Riot wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:59 am
I think the most damning thing about Chaqa was the totally unexplained vote on Bozo with about five minutes to go when it became clear that it was either Bozo or Macca on the block.
Is Chaqa making the wrong choice as town really that shocking? I think not

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1260 Post by worcej » Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:28 pm

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:54 am
xorxes wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:12 pm
worcej wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:01 pm
I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?
Wouldn't it make much more sense to make a case against them without mentioning that they're your buddy? What use is it for us to know you suspect them since we don't know who they are?
I have to agree this was at the very least a poorly thought out conversation topic. At worst it was a malicious scum move but I can't say for sure. Worcej on the surface is starting to seem quite scummy but my gut still says no. I'll take a look at the main people against him later (perhaps once voting starts tomorrow) and see which side I think is more likely town.
I did that intentionally to see how emc would react - I brought it up a second time to still see if he would react, knowing he was reading the thread.

He never did anything - when Chaqa was concerned he was scum (when emc wasn't), emc tried to explain it to him and defend himself. This time, he never said a word.

Then his EOD vote was shit - emc is definitely not an experienced scum player so bussing would be something he wouldn't just do (imho), so panicing onto a worthless vote makes sense.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], DimensionDoors, French_boi, SaintSimmer, Spartaculous