Mafia 56: Scout Camp

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
BismarckAlive
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:15 am
Location: Saxony
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1121 Post by BismarckAlive » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:14 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:50 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:08 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:56 am
VT: damo, rdrivera, HR, bozo, Durga, Donny, summit, brainbomb, BobMcBob (9)

Macca573 (7): xorxes rdrivera2005 bozotheclown Durga summit_fever Hellenic Riot damo666

The overlap here is interesting. With at least 2 scum in the VT claims, possibly 3, Donny, brainbomb, and Bob are the only possibilities that would not have been bussing Macca.

Maybe the remaining scum are Jamie, TRC, brainbomb, and Bob.
Reasoning please? This makes absolutely no sense. This is just adding 7 and 9 to get 3. There is very likely at least one scum in the PR list, and not all the PRs voted for Macca. What are you even trying to say, and where is your logic? I can't make it out. And also what on earth did you plop that potential scumteam on the bottom for, it has no relevance to the rest of your post. Bozo has been highly inarticulate this game.
What I was saying was that of the 9 VT claimants, which we know contains at least 2 scum, 6 voted for Macca, so either scum was bussing Macca or the scum is contained in the other three, Donny, brainbomb, and Bob.

My speculation about the remaining scum team is based only partly on the possibility that no scum was bussing Macca, and partly on others things I have previously mentioned.
If Bozo is NK'd tonight, we will certainly know why. Right now I would support lynching any of those three in D2 on spectacular odds.

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1122 Post by damo666 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:18 am

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:08 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:56 am
VT: damo, rdrivera, HR, bozo, Durga, Donny, summit, brainbomb, BobMcBob (9)

Macca573 (7): xorxes rdrivera2005 bozotheclown Durga summit_fever Hellenic Riot damo666

The overlap here is interesting. With at least 2 scum in the VT claims, possibly 3, Donny, brainbomb, and Bob are the only possibilities that would not have been bussing Macca.

Maybe the remaining scum are Jamie, TRC, brainbomb, and Bob.
Reasoning please? This makes absolutely no sense. This is just adding 7 and 9 to get 3. There is very likely at least one scum in the PR list, and not all the PRs voted for Macca. What are you even trying to say, and where is your logic? I can't make it out. And also what on earth did you plop that potential scumteam on the bottom for, it has no relevance to the rest of your post. Bozo has been highly inarticulate this game.
It does make sense

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1123 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:18 am

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:08 am
xorxes wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:36 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:34 pm


How hard is it to understand I don't have a strong read on anyone because I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO READ YET.

I think the entire massclaim idea is bad and if he's the one behind it, I'll vote for him due to that, but I missed most of the game so far.
He has proposed mass claims as town many times and you know it, it's a silly reason to vote for him. At best it's NAI.
But this massclaim's statistics were horrible compared to a lot of other games. Unfortunately, bozo's entire meta from what I've heard is massclaim every game at this point. I can't see a good reason for town to propose massclaim this game, but bozo loves massclaims way too much at this point it may not have stopped him.
I advocate for a mass claim when I think it is in the best interest of town (and I am town), which is not every game.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1124 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:23 am

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:21 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:46 pm
I prefer Bob to Macca, but Macca is a reasonable scum candidate among the VT claimants.

##VOTE Macca
Also very much interested to hear your thoughts here. What have I done to make you scumread me? If it was simply my opposition to a massclaim, can you provide a good reason why that warrants lynching me? The massclaim was a bad idea, and I don't feel like I was being anti-town in refusing to claim until I did.
Yes, mostly for your refusal to claim. I think the scum would prefer to avoid claiming if possible.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1125 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:28 am

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:32 am
Vecna wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:53 pm
Hellenic Riot wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:47 pm
I don't like the Bozo vote because at this point I feel like if he were scum he'd have done something other than continue to spout crap about the massclaim even while the votes were piling up on him
his problem as scum is he has a hard time coming up with genuine reads.

I told him to give genuine reads. Instead hes been robotic and true to his scum meta, and has been solely hiding behind the massclaim.

Also, theres that thing that quite a few people giving me the heebeejeebies are trying to dissuade us from wagoning him.
Okay, yeah, bozo can have his scumpoints back. This is another in the long list of things bozo has done wrong. He gave no actual reads all day, and his entire play was debate on the useless massclaim. At the very least bozo should start giving us actual reads.
I already suggested an entire remaining scum team, which you commented on.

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1126 Post by damo666 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:35 am

damo666 wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:31 am
Macca573 wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:59 am
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:18 am


If you are town, no matter if VT or PR you say the truth. If one town lie it screw with all the massclaim benefits.

If you are scum I will not give you hints.
Sorry this was unclear. These questions are not asking for what I should do. They are trying to find out how we understand outcome to action. i.e. Once we have everyone's claims, how do judge truth and move forwards?
From a town person's pov there are 11,628 possible scumteams (any 5 from 19).
Let's us assume there are 10 VT claims and 10 PR (not unreasonable).

The possible scumteams are
3 VT claimants + 2 PR (165)
4 VT + 1 PR (220)
5 VT (252).

637 possible scumteams.

A reduction of > 94%.

This is why town should press for massclaim and only vote for those resisting.
Whoops.

The 4 and 5 VT can be ignored and the 3 VT should be 120*45 not 120+45 so 5400 possible. A reduction of 53.6%.

Anyway things have moved on and the possibles greatly reduced. See next post.

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1127 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:11 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:50 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:08 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:56 am
VT: damo, rdrivera, HR, bozo, Durga, Donny, summit, brainbomb, BobMcBob (9)

Macca573 (7): xorxes rdrivera2005 bozotheclown Durga summit_fever Hellenic Riot damo666

The overlap here is interesting. With at least 2 scum in the VT claims, possibly 3, Donny, brainbomb, and Bob are the only possibilities that would not have been bussing Macca.

Maybe the remaining scum are Jamie, TRC, brainbomb, and Bob.
Reasoning please? This makes absolutely no sense. This is just adding 7 and 9 to get 3. There is very likely at least one scum in the PR list, and not all the PRs voted for Macca. What are you even trying to say, and where is your logic? I can't make it out. And also what on earth did you plop that potential scumteam on the bottom for, it has no relevance to the rest of your post. Bozo has been highly inarticulate this game.
What I was saying was that of the 9 VT claimants, which we know contains at least 2 scum, 6 voted for Macca, so either scum was bussing Macca or the scum is contained in the other three, Donny, brainbomb, and Bob.

My speculation about the remaining scum team is based only partly on the possibility that no scum was bussing Macca, and partly on others things I have previously mentioned.
Just because there's a faint possibility that no scum decided to bus one of their least useful members doesn't mean you should build a case around it. Chances are through the roof at least one of the seven people on him was scum. What reason do they have to not bus him?

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1128 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:13 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:03 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:29 am
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:10 pm


Every person who criticizes me but doesn't explain the rationale behind the massclaim is just proving my point.

If it was so pro-town, you'd all have the reasoning lined up.

Someone let you all get distracted by this nonsense the entire first day.
To be fair, he's not wrong. Someone(s) did get us distracted by the massclaim all day. It wan't a particuarly productive one. But enough people had jumped on the massclaim boat that it had already set sail. Nobody I don't have scum on said it was pro-town to start with, but it happened anyway.
Why do you think D1 was not productive when we lynched a scum?
I think it was unproductive because we spent the whole day arguing about a horrible massclaim instead of scumhunting. Just because we managed to pull a luck scum lynch out of our ass in the last 10 minutes doesn't make it a productive day.

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1129 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:15 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:04 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:49 am
BismarckAlive wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:47 am


Chaqa/Jamie claimed PR to make it 8 PR claims, then Worcej popped in at the end with his PR claim to make it 9 PR claims.
Okay, thanks. That makes at least 3 scum VT, at least one PR and TRC is a wildcard unfortunately.
At least 2 VT, because TRC could be the fourth.
Whoops, forgot to factor in the dead one into my equations. I stand corrected.

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1130 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:17 am

damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:18 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:08 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:56 am
VT: damo, rdrivera, HR, bozo, Durga, Donny, summit, brainbomb, BobMcBob (9)

Macca573 (7): xorxes rdrivera2005 bozotheclown Durga summit_fever Hellenic Riot damo666

The overlap here is interesting. With at least 2 scum in the VT claims, possibly 3, Donny, brainbomb, and Bob are the only possibilities that would not have been bussing Macca.

Maybe the remaining scum are Jamie, TRC, brainbomb, and Bob.
Reasoning please? This makes absolutely no sense. This is just adding 7 and 9 to get 3. There is very likely at least one scum in the PR list, and not all the PRs voted for Macca. What are you even trying to say, and where is your logic? I can't make it out. And also what on earth did you plop that potential scumteam on the bottom for, it has no relevance to the rest of your post. Bozo has been highly inarticulate this game.
It does make sense
Explain then. Why the heck is bozo focusing on the possibility that no scum bussed Macca when the odds are astronomically low?

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1131 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:18 am

Good evening. im having a cup of decaf and rereading. looking at how natural the macca wagon formed after chaqa claimed. Im not sure scum wouldve had time to even scramble bussers onto macca so I think we just lynch away from that wagon for a while. My tinfoil theory here is that Deep scumbin the PR pool convinced chat oartners to role swap

someone like xorxes could absolutely pull it off without a hitch

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1132 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:20 am

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:17 am
damo666 wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:18 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:08 am


Reasoning please? This makes absolutely no sense. This is just adding 7 and 9 to get 3. There is very likely at least one scum in the PR list, and not all the PRs voted for Macca. What are you even trying to say, and where is your logic? I can't make it out. And also what on earth did you plop that potential scumteam on the bottom for, it has no relevance to the rest of your post. Bozo has been highly inarticulate this game.
It does make sense
Explain then. Why the heck is bozo focusing on the possibility that no scum bussed Macca when the odds are astronomically low?
I artfully agree with bozo here
No scum couldve bussed in that window of time.

also Jamie can probably be the lynch tomorrow barring a red scan

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1133 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:21 am

BismarckAlive wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:14 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:50 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:08 am


Reasoning please? This makes absolutely no sense. This is just adding 7 and 9 to get 3. There is very likely at least one scum in the PR list, and not all the PRs voted for Macca. What are you even trying to say, and where is your logic? I can't make it out. And also what on earth did you plop that potential scumteam on the bottom for, it has no relevance to the rest of your post. Bozo has been highly inarticulate this game.
What I was saying was that of the 9 VT claimants, which we know contains at least 2 scum, 6 voted for Macca, so either scum was bussing Macca or the scum is contained in the other three, Donny, brainbomb, and Bob.

My speculation about the remaining scum team is based only partly on the possibility that no scum was bussing Macca, and partly on others things I have previously mentioned.
If Bozo is NK'd tonight, we will certainly know why. Right now I would support lynching any of those three in D2 on spectacular odds.
I wouldn't call these spectacular odds. I wouldn't be surprised if he's setting up for an easy mislynch. Not saying that's what it is, but the logic doesn't hold up. As I already said, the odds no scum bussed Macca out of seven voters is ridiculously low, almost insignificant. Focusing on that tiny possibility to draw scumreads is very poor form.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1134 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:23 am

xorxes wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:36 pm
People macca interacted with:

brain
xorxes
emc
Vecna
Durga
worcej
Bismark
bozo
Vecna
Donny
rivera
damo

Some of the interactions are neutral, but none gave me S-S vibes. The people they never interacted with are:

PR pool:
Chaqa
flash2015
JF1981
TheFlyingBoat

VT pool:
BobMcBob
Hellenic Riot
summit_fever

Unknown pool:
TheRealCottonmouth

I would not be surprised if the whole scumteam is in there.
HR and summit do not seem to be likely Macca bussers, though. Maybe summit, he might have thought I would still get lynched when he voted for Macca.

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1135 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:23 am

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:18 am
Good evening. im having a cup of decaf and rereading. looking at how natural the macca wagon formed after chaqa claimed. Im not sure scum wouldve had time to even scramble bussers onto macca so I think we just lynch away from that wagon for a while. My tinfoil theory here is that Deep scumbin the PR pool convinced chat oartners to role swap

someone like xorxes could absolutely pull it off without a hitch
What makes you think that the scum were incapable of voting at the same speed as an average player? I may be missing something crucial about the standard bussing strategy, but I can't see any reason that's so hard.

BobMcBob
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1136 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:26 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:23 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:21 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:46 pm
I prefer Bob to Macca, but Macca is a reasonable scum candidate among the VT claimants.

##VOTE Macca
Also very much interested to hear your thoughts here. What have I done to make you scumread me? If it was simply my opposition to a massclaim, can you provide a good reason why that warrants lynching me? The massclaim was a bad idea, and I don't feel like I was being anti-town in refusing to claim until I did.
Yes, mostly for your refusal to claim. I think the scum would prefer to avoid claiming if possible.
And in the process make themselves look bad for not claiming? The ship was already about to sail when I refused to claim, but I refused because I didn't like the massclaim. I'm not gonna restate my reasons here.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1137 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:26 am

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:23 am
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:18 am
Good evening. im having a cup of decaf and rereading. looking at how natural the macca wagon formed after chaqa claimed. Im not sure scum wouldve had time to even scramble bussers onto macca so I think we just lynch away from that wagon for a while. My tinfoil theory here is that Deep scumbin the PR pool convinced chat oartners to role swap

someone like xorxes could absolutely pull it off without a hitch
What makes you think that the scum were incapable of voting at the same speed as an average player? I may be missing something crucial about the standard bussing strategy, but I can't see any reason that's so hard.
What would be the motive to lynch for cred with 20 players alive at the time. not saying it never happens but who specifically seems desperate there for cred? durga?

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1138 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:27 am

the only reason macca wagon happens is chaqa claiming PR and then trying to get bozo licked

BismarckAlive
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:15 am
Location: Saxony
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1139 Post by BismarckAlive » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:28 am

BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:11 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:50 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:08 am


Reasoning please? This makes absolutely no sense. This is just adding 7 and 9 to get 3. There is very likely at least one scum in the PR list, and not all the PRs voted for Macca. What are you even trying to say, and where is your logic? I can't make it out. And also what on earth did you plop that potential scumteam on the bottom for, it has no relevance to the rest of your post. Bozo has been highly inarticulate this game.
What I was saying was that of the 9 VT claimants, which we know contains at least 2 scum, 6 voted for Macca, so either scum was bussing Macca or the scum is contained in the other three, Donny, brainbomb, and Bob.

My speculation about the remaining scum team is based only partly on the possibility that no scum was bussing Macca, and partly on others things I have previously mentioned.
Just because there's a faint possibility that no scum decided to bus one of their least useful members doesn't mean you should build a case around it. Chances are through the roof at least one of the seven people on him was scum. What reason do they have to not bus him?
Fear that the massclaim favours the clean scouts (which it does). Right now, the 4 dirty scouts left are fretting about impending doom, and likely tossing up their chances at a double-kill tonight to feel better about the D1 disaster.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#1140 Post by brainbomb » Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:28 am

its hard to imagine chaqa ever being town based on how that all went down and I think scum was just flat footed

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], brainbomb, Chomps, Hominidae, Spartaculous