Mafia 56: Scout Camp

[Chaqa]

I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?

My buddy and I don't really talk

[Chaqa]

True. This is exactly why all town players should claim at this point.

What advantage you see for town if you don't claim?

Sometimes a protest doesn't have a clearly defined point.

Screwing with your team to make a point is a shitty way to protest.
If you want to protest on the main Mafia post that we should have setups that can't have massclaims I will be the first to support you.
But in this game you are just hurting town.

I've been pushing for that for months. I thought our setup approval process involved massclaim-prevention checks, but it might be more of a dream than anything.

[bozotheclown]

The neat thing here is there's absolutely no incentive for any town member to lynch me if i don't claim, since you'll not know whether I am VT or PR due to the alignment-only flips.

So really, you can all fuck off with your massclaim. I ain't playin that game.

It won't be a problem if you flip scum.

lol I'd never give you the satisfaction bozo.

It seems like a scum perspective to only care about whether or not you get lynched. If you are town, claiming PR or VT will increase the chances of lynching scum today.

[Durga]

I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?

My buddy and I don't really talk

I frankly don't see the point of the chat at all.

[xorxes]

I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?

I feel like mine may be too
Very not talkative at all

We should not be describing our chat buddies and give scum ways to figure out who is with who. Worcej seems to be fishing here. I don't see the town motivation for this discussion.

[brainbomb]

I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?

My buddy and I don't really talk

I frankly don't see the point of the chat at all.

exactly
its just a liability

mu ran a game called restless communication where every player had a 1 on 1 chat with 5 other people. the game thread itself had a 10 post max limit. it was a horrible game. town got swept entirely.

I was scum in it so it was a blast. you can really abuse setups like this as scum and cause problems

[xorxes]

I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?

Wouldn't it make much more sense to make a case against them without mentioning that they're your buddy? What use is it for us to know you suspect them since we don't know who they are?

[brainbomb]

It seems to me that worcej is probably currently voting the person he finds scummiest.

is there some reason you assert he isnt already on his chat partners wagon xorx?

[Chaqa]

It won't be a problem if you flip scum.

lol I'd never give you the satisfaction bozo.

It seems like a scum perspective to only care about whether or not you get lynched. If you are town, claiming PR or VT will increase the chances of lynching scum today.

We went through this debate a bit last game. Even though I was scum that game, I'm not one that lives in the "town should let themselves be lynched" camp.

I'd argue our best bet to find scum today is to look for people with low post counts, low vote movement, and general disengagement (yes, I'm aware this fits me somewhat, but I'm nothing if not hypocritical)

[damo666]

##vote Chaqa

[xorxes]

It seems to me that worcej is probably currently voting the person he finds scummiest.

is there some reason you assert he isnt already on his chat partners wagon xorx?

He can't be with bozo if you are, can he?

[Durga]

I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?

I feel like mine may be too
Very not talkative at all

We should not be describing our chat buddies and give scum ways to figure out who is with who. Worcej seems to be fishing here. I don't see the town motivation for this discussion.

This is a good point. While I feel worcej's overall attitude is townie, his actions are certainly contrary to it.

[Chaqa]

##vote Chaqa

https://media.giphy.com/media/XV74ZvGRXcZdS/giphy.gif

[worcej]

I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?

I feel like mine may be too
Very not talkative at all

We should not be describing our chat buddies and give scum ways to figure out who is with who. Worcej seems to be fishing here. I don't see the town motivation for this discussion.

In no way am I fishing for content of the conversations, and regardless, how does that help scum? They know their buddies and can guess from the rest.

I just said I believe my buddy is scum. Good luck figuring out who it is based off that alone.

[Donny Dude]

I feel like mine may be too
Very not talkative at all

We should not be describing our chat buddies and give scum ways to figure out who is with who. Worcej seems to be fishing here. I don't see the town motivation for this discussion.

This is a good point. While I feel worcej's overall attitude is townie, his actions are certainly contrary to it.

I agree.

[brainbomb]

It seems to me that worcej is probably currently voting the person he finds scummiest.

is there some reason you assert he isnt already on his chat partners wagon xorx?

He can't be with bozo if you are, can he?

ah

welp it helps to look at the vote count I suppse

[worcej]

I'll bring this up again since it got lost:

I am pretty sure my buddy is scum.

Anyone else feel that way based on their convos, or was I the only one trying to engage with them enough?

Wouldn't it make much more sense to make a case against them without mentioning that they're your buddy? What use is it for us to know you suspect them since we don't know who they are?

Because I think I caught a scum and it'll be good to use for later information?

You're so happy to get information from a mass claim, why not enjoy I think I caught a scum in my buddy chat?

[brainbomb]

reminder that chaqa voted trump

[worcej]

reminder that chaqa voted trump

So did I. Screw the democratic party, seriously it's a dumpster fire and continues to rage by thinking the seriously old white dude showing signs of dementia was the best choice against the raging cheeto.

[Donny Dude]

reminder that chaqa voted trump

What am I supposed to do about that ?
Other than commentary on sociology and mafia.