Mafia 56: Scout Camp

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#621 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 2:59 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:39 am
BobMcBob wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:05 am
In terms of horrible numbers, what really stuck out to me was bozo saying that if we had more than 8 PR claims we should get all the PRs to claim roles so that we can root out mafia. I cannot see any way that getting 1 or 2 mafia into a group of three to lynch from while simultaneously revealing exactly where to hit to nullify our best PR actions is a good thing. Not only that, he thought that (assuming one scum claimed Medic and one claimed cool guy) that a 1/3 chance of lynching correctly out of a pool of 2 PRs and one scum was a good deal. I can see no way town benefits from that. And I don't think bozo is stupid enough to mess up the numbers that badly.
I believe the mass claim benefits town if the scum choose to do that. However, we do not need to do the full mass claim immediately, certainly not D1. Maybe N1 if more than 1 scum claim PR.
Why would you want to allow the scum to coordinate their PR claims?

If you don't want them to coordinate the piles on D1, you would need them to not coordinate the claims for roles.

You are so obviously scum.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#622 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:00 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:07 am
worcej wrote:
Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:09 pm
damo666 wrote:
Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:18 am
I think Bozo is right.

I am gonna ko the massclaim

I am not a PR
First annoying person found on re-read. Not shocked.
Would love some of your spicy original recipe tales from the maf crypt with how damo thinks as a wolflord
Damo is actually a great wolf - he posts short and sweet and doesn't stick his neck out while stating his opinions.

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#623 Post by damo666 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:00 pm

BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 10:14 am
damo666 wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 9:17 am
BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:07 am


14/20 claims is now getting up there. There is no telling how many scum are in the 14 claimants, nor how many left in the 6 that have not claimed. Also, no way of knowing who in the 6 PRs are scum etc.

I am philosophically opposed to massclaims. I don't think it is in the spirit of the game - the fun is in the uncertainty, the management of information, the hunting, the conniving etc. On this, I agree with brainbomb, Vecna, Worcej and the others that have resisted this. Is there something in who resisted / who pushed this? Who does it benefit most? Is the mafia knowing the 8 PRs more or less valuable than the information we get? Some have tried to work this out, but we will only know if everybody claims.

My vote on Worcej is NOT because of his stance. I have a similar stance. I am voting for him because I think he tried coaching the newbie scum. And I can be convinced otherwise.

In the interests of the exercise proving its worth or not, and despite my abhorrence at what I am about to do, I claim PR.

I urge all Town to claim, and thus help test the thesis.
Why did you doctor the quote to appear as if you had already claimed?
just to make it easy to see the result at that time. I didn't know when I posted it that Macca had claimed as well. I was just trying to be helpful...
OK no big deal.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#624 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:01 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:08 am
Vecna wrote:
Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:24 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:55 pm
If you have yet to realize the frustration Vecna and myself are projecting - it's annoying that we turn a game of subterfuge into and stop actually really scum hunting via actions/words and instead just start sorting out piles.

If I wanted that, I'd play 52 card pickup.
<3

Lets do it one last time worcej. If we manage to kill it this game, going forward were goong to demanf closed setups, or vanilla-only open setups.

I sort of knew this was going to be the issue as soon as I saw the setup. probably shouldve hammered harder for more anto claim.

but yes, u nailed it. was looking forward to some subterfuge
simple correction by just making a setup where if you claim or soft you get vanillized.
Another option for my future games.

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#625 Post by Vecna » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:01 pm

Also, noone has yet stated what the next step will look like. Maybe further claims arent needed, depending on the last three claims.

Maybe some of us who have changed their mind came up with cunning plans to abuse this further that they havent revealed yet. Who knows.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#626 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:03 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:34 am
So why not bozo?

Well there is a reason. and its a good one. Its because bozo is easy to read, always useful late, and has an easy to spot scum style.

So why or why not worcej?

Well the why is that he is hard to read. but thats literally it.
The why not is that hes a fun competitor long term. And its a curiousity why hes abstaining from massclaim.
What's funny is you've said I am easy to read in the past.

Typical WIFOM BB lol

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#627 Post by damo666 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:04 pm

Hellenic Riot wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:48 am
I see that damo has once again come in, and has this time made some aggro posts about mechanics while continuing to add absolutely nothing to debates about who is actually scum. My vote on him intensifies.
It's day 1

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#628 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:05 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:22 am
The big topic we shouldve covered was how a flipless game changes information lynches. We always assume games without info are terrible. Most lynches this game will be based on volume, who seems reactionary, what posts contain perceptual flaws, and what chat pairings result in deaths.

If someone ends up in an empty chat its worth noting.
additionally dont forsake instinct. gut feelings are crucial in a flipless game. its eaay to lose scent and dive into radical theories on scumteams, w/w tinfoil and bus conspiracies. Trust me. Thats basically all I am.

That being said, when theres no flips theres no bussing. because whats the point?
We learn alignment, so bussing still works.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#629 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:05 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:04 pm
Hellenic Riot wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:48 am
I see that damo has once again come in, and has this time made some aggro posts about mechanics while continuing to add absolutely nothing to debates about who is actually scum. My vote on him intensifies.
It's day 1
Also, it fits your scum game.

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#630 Post by damo666 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:16 pm

worcej wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:05 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:04 pm
Hellenic Riot wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:48 am
I see that damo has once again come in, and has this time made some aggro posts about mechanics while continuing to add absolutely nothing to debates about who is actually scum. My vote on him intensifies.
It's day 1
Also, it fits your scum game.
Got to protect the meta!

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#631 Post by damo666 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:17 pm

worcej wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:00 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:07 am
worcej wrote:
Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:09 pm
First annoying person found on re-read. Not shocked.
Would love some of your spicy original recipe tales from the maf crypt with how damo thinks as a wolflord
Damo is actually a great wolf - he posts short and sweet and doesn't stick his neck out while stating his opinions.
:shock:

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#632 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:20 pm

BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:42 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:33 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:54 am


On what experience are you basing this assessment of worcej?
Why did you +1 this post but not answer it?
I have played enough games with Worcej to know (1) he is a great player, hard to read, and (2) his wall on the bot was way different to what I remember from our joint games in that in this one he seems to be coaching by hypothesising with the massclaim numbers. I have never seen him doing that...I think it is because he saw how many newbies there were, did his sums, and just needed to give them some massclaim strategy...
I think this marks the first time I've ever been labeled as great.

In regards to never doing it - the last time I didn't was because I was scum and was keeping my head down, but was seething on the inside. Kitsune tried to make a cool game, but she neutered the mafia team because there was only 3 of us and 6-8 town PRs (cannot remember the exact number).

In that game, we did the exact same thing as we are doing now - PR vs VT. The issue with her game was that the scum was too small in comparison to the town on D1 because she built in the reaver team (scum 2) too heavily into the balance, which resulted in a terribly weak scum situation on D1, and that the PRs for town were easily confirmable to drop the numbers lower.

To give squigs credit for this game now, there are little ways to confirm most of the PRs for town, so that makes it more scum balanced to begin with. Then couple in the protection granted by not telling certain PRs their letters, which makes it so the scum never have to claim one of those and can keep at least two members hidden makes it even better for them.

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#633 Post by damo666 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:20 pm

JF1981 wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:11 pm
Im not a VT
Dirty Lazy Scout?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#634 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:21 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:47 am
BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:42 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:33 am


Why did you +1 this post but not answer it?
I have played enough games with Worcej to know (1) he is a great player, hard to read, and (2) his wall on the bot was way different to what I remember from our joint games in that in this one he seems to be coaching by hypothesising with the massclaim numbers. I have never seen him doing that...I think it is because he saw how many newbies there were, did his sums, and just needed to give them some massclaim strategy...
How many games have you played with worcej?
I hope this gets responded to.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#635 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:23 pm

BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:51 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:47 am
BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:42 am


I have played enough games with Worcej to know (1) he is a great player, hard to read, and (2) his wall on the bot was way different to what I remember from our joint games in that in this one he seems to be coaching by hypothesising with the massclaim numbers. I have never seen him doing that...I think it is because he saw how many newbies there were, did his sums, and just needed to give them some massclaim strategy...
How many games have you played with worcej?
This is the 3rd I think, and he always lasts quite a bit... :o
Because people think I suck (imho)

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#636 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:23 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:59 am
BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:51 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:47 am


How many games have you played with worcej?
This is the 3rd I think, and he always lasts quite a bit... :o
Were they all on this site?
I only play here FWIW

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#637 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:24 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:10 am
BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:51 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:47 am


How many games have you played with worcej?
This is the 3rd I think, and he always lasts quite a bit... :o
Survival does not necessarily equate to goodness
Looks like my own opinion was backed up by damo lol

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#638 Post by brainbomb » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:24 pm

worcej wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:23 pm
BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:51 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:47 am


How many games have you played with worcej?
This is the 3rd I think, and he always lasts quite a bit... :o
Because people think I suck (imho)
I dont. im also not really lynching you today amigo

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#639 Post by brainbomb » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:25 pm

I could see rivera being scum here too.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 56: Scout Camp

#640 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:26 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:17 am
BismarckAlive wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:11 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:59 am


Were they all on this site?
yes
As far as I can tell, you have only played in M37, M38, and M55. M38 was terminated after D2, and worcej was the GM of M55.
Seconding this line - because I was curious where the hell Bismark got an impression of me that seemed to fake.

But people can have an impression based on reading games too. I still think bozo is being more scummy than a possible slip from Bismarck.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]