Mafia 56: Scout Camp

[e.m.c^42]

Would it be breakable if everyone claimed?

Or no, bad wording, more likely to cancel out negative side effects.

[e.m.c^42]

should the people in buddy chats claim they are or should we keep that on the DL

I'm waiting for an answer from GM on that. It depends on whether the QTs could be compromised later even if you trust your buddy.

I would highly doubt that, since we're allowed to use other forms of outside communication in place of the QT

[rdrivera2005]

So:

Posting requirement is 2 posts per day phase.

+1s are allowed.

You must vote each day phase to send someone home. You are allowed to vote to send no one home. Votes are like this: ##vote Squigs44

No cheating, game throwing, etc.

OH YEAH! +1's allowed is back baby!!!

Lmao, watch this have something to do with the special NK mechanic

The special NK mechanic is on the first post....

Good night everybody by the way.

[xorxes]

Note that it is likely in your best interest to keep your buddy secret due to a special NK mechanic.

The special mechanic is that the dirty ones (can we call them Mafia) can kill two townies at once if they know they're buddies.

[worcej]

Nothing substantial so far, everyone seems towny.

<3

I kind of wish I could get access to other people's buddy chats, to spam properly. D'ya think, with enough +1's I can make that happen ;p

I feel for you buddy.

To obvious to be true.

[e.m.c^42]

(can we call them Mafia)

No, we should continue to use this language as to make it incredibly awkward the longer it goes on.

[rdrivera2005]

##vote xorx for now lol, since he's not likely gonna be a wagon and I promised I'd vote early this game

This is weird.

[xorxes]

Would it be breakable if everyone claimed?

Assuming all 5 scum claim VT, that would give us 7 clears. Something to consider.

[e.m.c^42]

##vote xorx for now lol, since he's not likely gonna be a wagon and I promised I'd vote early this game

This is weird.

I'm a changed man, rivera. Surrounded by all these camp boys I feel like looking for a Catholic priest.

[Squigs44]

Rewording of a role for clarification:
Tape recorder: Target a player. If you are sent home on the night you use it, the scoutmaster will receive a scan on the targeted player. If the scoutmaster is already home (and thus can't receive the scan) it will be posted in thread instead.

[xorxes]

should the people in buddy chats claim they are or should we keep that on the DL

I'm waiting for an answer from GM on that. It depends on whether the QTs could be compromised later even if you trust your buddy.

I would highly doubt that, since we're allowed to use other forms of outside communication in place of the QT

I got confirmed that new buddies get new QTs, so whatever you tell your buddy stays with them, unless they are dirty.

[xorxes]

Would it be breakable if everyone claimed?

Assuming all 5 scum claim VT, that would give us 7 clears. Something to consider.

8 clear cleans actually, and 5/12 dirty ones.

[rdrivera2005]

Would it be breakable if everyone claimed?

Assuming all 5 scum claim VT, that would give us 7 clears. Something to consider.

I think it's 8 clears if all scum claim VT. We will have a pool of 12 to lynch from.
I don't like massclaims but this look like good odds for town, maybe not on D1 but later so the most usefull PRs can use his powers at least once.

[rdrivera2005]

Would it be breakable if everyone claimed?

Assuming all 5 scum claim VT, that would give us 7 clears. Something to consider.

8 clear cleans actually, and 5/12 dirty ones.

Exactly.

[xorxes]

Would it be breakable if everyone claimed?

Assuming all 5 scum claim VT, that would give us 7 clears. Something to consider.

I think it's 8 clears if all scum claim VT. We will have a pool of 12 to lynch from.
I don't like massclaims but this look like good odds for town, maybe not on D1 but later so the most usefull PRs can use his powers at least once.

Later is less useful because there will be people whose roles we won't be able to know.

[worcej]

##vote xorx for now lol, since he's not likely gonna be a wagon and I promised I'd vote early this game

This is weird.

FWIW - my thoughts exactly. Why does EMC want to try to survive more now than normal?

[worcej]

##vote xorx for now lol, since he's not likely gonna be a wagon and I promised I'd vote early this game

This is weird.

I'm a changed man, rivera. Surrounded by all these camp boys I feel like looking for a Catholic priest.

Oooooooooof.....

[e.m.c^42]

##vote xorx for now lol, since he's not likely gonna be a wagon and I promised I'd vote early this game

This is weird.

FWIW - my thoughts exactly. Why does EMC want to try to survive more now than normal? :neutral:

Lmao, alright, a special ##vote worce just for you

[rdrivera2005]

Assuming all 5 scum claim VT, that would give us 7 clears. Something to consider.

I think it's 8 clears if all scum claim VT. We will have a pool of 12 to lynch from.
I don't like massclaims but this look like good odds for town, maybe not on D1 but later so the most usefull PRs can use his powers at least once.

Later is less useful because there will be people whose roles we won't be able to know.

True, I forgot the no role reveal. But I think scum will also not know what roles the NK had, so it will be hard for them to claim a PR.

[Donny Dude]

I think it's 8 clears if all scum claim VT. We will have a pool of 12 to lynch from.
I don't like massclaims but this look like good odds for town, maybe not on D1 but later so the most usefull PRs can use his powers at least once.

Later is less useful because there will be people whose roles we won't be able to know.

True, I forgot the no role reveal. But I think scum will also not know what roles the NK had, so it will be hard for them to claim a PR.

Will role switches complicate clears though from what is remaining?