Oh...that does make flavor sense if the mastermind is handing out the watchesVecna wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 12:22 pmscum mastermind manipulator with extra powers added on top of the neighbouriser?
its possible jamiet, dont be ruling it out now.
Remember: CHAQA KNEW THERE WAS MORE 3P OUT THERE
when RHK was flailing around, he suggested it might be a 3P doc and not to lynch him but leash him
M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: M55: QUICKTOPIC MADNESS
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Why would Xorxes even out his own cult leader? Makes no senseChaqa wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 7:58 pm@brain - I'm hoping to add you to the QT tomorrow to explain what happened today, but I think we can trust xorxes. The only person in the QT I'm unsure of is food, and if anything he's Inquisitor. But, if he were, xorxes would also likely be, since there seems to be a missing kill from Night 2.
And if that role actually transferred it would be the most op 3rd party by quite a large margin.
It already was pretty pretty out there now
I think we can safely rule that out and stop fearmongering over more inquisitors
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
redirector more plausible IF you are town
They clearly thought there was a chance you might die from visiting me, so they wouldnt risk visiting me themselves first
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
I need you bunny.
you n me feel like the only sane people left lol
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Strangling likely was the kill flavour for the inquisitor. The role pm talks about his RIGHTEOUS HAND leading all sinners to the path of redemptionbrainbomb wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 8:20 pmso xorx was jailed this night.worcej wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 9:25 pmN2 Flavor
The room is dark. The Mastermind sits in a comfy chair, watching several monitors. He is happy - his little ticket to millions in cash is going well so far. The producers he hired are foaming at the lips with all the drama they are able to clip and make numerous episodes out of already.
On one screen, a woman is seen approaching a man, only to be mowed down by a hail of bullets from an AK-47. On another, he sees a bus driver being chocked out and his neck broken effortlessly. The rest of the monitors show people sheltering in place, scared out of their mind.
He takes a sip from his wine glass. "Good... keep performing well my little minions...
He leans back in the chair and puts his feet up on the table as he watches more.
kgray HAS DIED! SHE WAS THE TOWN MOTION DETECTOR!TheMarche HAS DIED! THEY WERE THE TOWN BUS DRIVER!worcej wrote:Mon Apr 27, 2020 6:41 pmYou are the Town Motion Detector! Your keen sense of detection has been homed in by all the hours you’ve spent as a TSA agent. During the night, you may ##detect a player by PMing the GM. When you do, you learn if any actions were performed on a player, how many, and what type of actions were – meaning you will be told if it was either a Roleblock-type, Protective-type, Investigative-type, or Killing action. You do not learn who did the actions or if they were successful or not. Your ability is considered an Investigative-type ability.
You win when the Town faction is the last faction left standing.Day 3 has begun. You may now post.worcej wrote:Mon Apr 27, 2020 6:38 pmYou are the Town Bus Driver! You love taking people to and from for whatever reason you want! Each night, you can ##swap two players by PMing the GM. When you do, those players swap places and any action targeting one will target the other. Your ability is considered a Protective-type ability.
You win when the Town faction is the last faction left standing.
and theres a death from bullets and a strangling
so strangling makes sense there
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Ask the gm if you jailoring someone would cause them to convert if targeted by the inQ.
He'll only answer the question if it comes from you since its your role and not public, following GM convention
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Sort of interesting he stated that way back when huh?
Hint: its because he was already aware of the inquisitor role after getting recruited.
LR is not a roleblocking action BY ANY LOGIC EVER
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
How is that a good point whatsoever?
You claim your action is a roleblock action.
This proves that is a lie. Or that neph is actually not town. Potentially even both.
If you were both town roleblockers your actions would activate AT THE SAME TIME, meaning you would not be jailkept because he would not be redirected.
so either it means neph is actually SCUM or that YOU are 3p that got recruited and is lying about the RB part because you knew it might come up when the inquisitor would get lynched later on.
nice slipping buddy
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Continuing catchup. Will be very suspect if xorxes does not comment on that inconsistency
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33940
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Incorrect, Vecna.Vecna wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 12:45 pmHow is that a good point whatsoever?
You claim your action is a roleblock action.
This proves that is a lie. Or that neph is actually not town. Potentially even both.
If you were both town roleblockers your actions would activate AT THE SAME TIME, meaning you would not be jailkept because he would not be redirected.
so either it means neph is actually SCUM or that YOU are 3p that got recruited and is lying about the RB part because you knew it might come up when the inquisitor would get lynched later on.
nice slipping buddy
Look:
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
oh look, another brainbomb slip.foodcoats wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 11:10 pmWhy did brainbomb say this D2 after my LR action? No one asks brain to claim, and brain says their action was "not lost?" That makes no sense as the doctor role brain later claimed. And brain made a big deal about crumbing doctor... so why crumb doctor but also suggest that you have a one-shot ability?
He later clarified stating "I meant whether I could retarget"
but now he's claiming he could retarget regardless?
or did he only find out later?
regardless, this shit was suspect
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Mastermind is clearly worcej's role. That's how I've been interpreting it.
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Yes jamiet, so if theyre both town with abilities classified as a roleblock?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 12:47 pmIncorrect, Vecna.Vecna wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 12:45 pmHow is that a good point whatsoever?
You claim your action is a roleblock action.
This proves that is a lie. Or that neph is actually not town. Potentially even both.
If you were both town roleblockers your actions would activate AT THE SAME TIME, meaning you would not be jailkept because he would not be redirected.
so either it means neph is actually SCUM or that YOU are 3p that got recruited and is lying about the RB part because you knew it might come up when the inquisitor would get lynched later on.
nice slipping buddy
Look:
What does that mean?
That they fire simultaneously. Which was not the case, because nephs action was pulled in.
Ergo, they cannot both be town telling the truth that their abilities are both roleblock actions
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Why would the inquisitor be a nuisance to the GM?xorxes wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 12:48 pmMastermind is clearly worcej's role. That's how I've been interpreting it.
read the rdrivera flip again
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Theres like 120 pages of this game I havent read and I still feel like I pick up on way more than anyone else.
big lol @ the lotta ya really
big lol @ the lotta ya really
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
which wouldnt happen regardless, unless there was a town roleblocker, of which foodcoats shouldve gotten a message.
All other abilities would fire after a scum jailkeep as well
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
Well, at least xorxes did comment on the inconsistencyxorxes wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 11:22 pmYour "roleblock" (i.e. interference with everybody else's actions) occured before Nephs roleblock. Everything else (the protection from everyone else's actions) was Neph's action, which came after your roleblock.
If his roleblock had come first you would not have had any effect on anyone.
Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread
you were trying to distract from the xorxes guilty on rdrivera lol.foodcoats wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 11:27 pmFair enough. He doesn't, but, his claim still reads pretty naturally... it does not have the tinfoil elements I had absorbed from listening to Vecna for too long...xorxes wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 11:18 pmHe said he meant he could save the same person again the next day because that one didn't count. He supposedly had not realized at that point that he did not have that restriction anyway. He clarified all that before RHK's role was revealed, I believe, but I have not checked.foodcoats wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 11:10 pm
Why did brainbomb say this D2 after my LR action? No one asks brain to claim, and brain says their action was "not lost?" That makes no sense as the doctor role brain later claimed. And brain made a big deal about crumbing doctor... so why crumb doctor but also suggest that you have a one-shot ability?
it was so obvious
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ernst_Brenner, Hominidae, Spartaculous