M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4161 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 11:04 am

Chaqa wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 11:28 pm
I suspect jailer is mafia. Would imply xorxes is town if he was jailed.

Alternatively some grand xorxes-flash-EMC conspiracy, which would seem too simple.
I disagree with this

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4162 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 11:06 am

xorxes wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 11:36 pm
So emc is, as expected, [Town/Mafia] Tracker.
Or just general scum with Flash. They would need nothing if the jailkeeper is scum.

Anyways, doing it that way would really become difficult the coming night, especially if he allows chaqa to dictate his order

Seems unlikely

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4163 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 11:08 am

xorxes wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 11:39 pm
@Vecna, can you tell us the actual name of your role?
Town paranoid gun owner

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4164 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 11:09 am

Chaqa wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 11:40 pm
Flash isn't necessarily cleared. If Vecna killed both of them, flash could have been mafia killer and xorx was jailed by a town jailer?

So much WIFOM
I already claimed that the flavour strongly implied only the motion detector visited me and died due to my ability

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4165 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 11:10 am

Chaqa wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 11:46 pm
I would actually be really disappointed in worcej if he's using flavor to relay actual information.
He is. And youre acting like EoN messages havent included flavour for forever to indicate what killed who

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4166 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 11:11 am

Chaqa wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 11:46 pm
I would actually be really disappointed in worcej if he's using flavor to relay actual information.
Also, the pm i got strongly implied it was just one person

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4167 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 11:18 am

e.m.c^42 wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:15 am
Xorxes, what?

I am tracker not watcher. Are you sure you are reading
This just seems like a bit of a cheap potshot at an obvious small mistake emc :p

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 5014
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4168 Post by foodcoats » Mon May 04, 2020 11:28 am

xorxes wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 2:13 am
foodcoats wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 7:01 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 6:08 pm


Does your role description say that your power is performed first, and therefore can't be roleblocked?
Yeah, it happens before any other roleblocking abilities.
@food, can you tell us if your role is described as roleblocking-type?
Why would that matter? It seems to me you suggested earlier that this setup isn't balanced by the roles. So what does it matter to you how many X types and Y types there are? What could you learn from that, since you don't think the game is rationally structured?

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 5014
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4169 Post by foodcoats » Mon May 04, 2020 11:39 am

dargorygel wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 12:06 pm
Thanks for your forbearance, all. Rough weekend. I’ll be back in the morning and willing to vote Bozo or nephy. I’m coming around on the emc thing. His copy/paste are not the act of a scum with a daychat.

Summit, have you stopped reading?
darg, why did you feel the need to coach summit here?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33940
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4170 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon May 04, 2020 11:50 am

brainbomb wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 5:49 am

Dead or replaced players
TheMarche died Day 3 - THEY WERE THE TOWN BUS DRIVER!
kgray died Day 3 - SHE WAS THE TOWN MOTION DETECTOR!
BismarckAlive died Night 2 - HE WAS CHUCK GREENE, THE TOWN JACK-OF-ALL-TRADES.
Donny Dude died EoD1 - THEY WERE [REDACTED] OF THE [REDACTED] FACTION!
##Call Jamiet99uk

I object that no exclamation was given to bismark
I am not the GM.

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4171 Post by damo666 » Mon May 04, 2020 11:52 am

Nephthys wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 2:12 am
xorxes wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 1:54 am
Nephthys wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 1:41 am


Why? Am I wrong?
Nope. It's just that we were both so convincing it was hard to tell which one you found more compelling.
True....

Damo does have a good point
Yeah. Accurate and succinct. Just forgot to show my working.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33940
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4172 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon May 04, 2020 11:55 am

@Chaqa:

You know what, even if you are a blind squirrel when it comes to the information that the flavour might contain, I have 3 pieces of information to share with you.

I think that one of DemonRHK or Brainbomb is scum.

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4173 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 12:04 pm

I have a working theory jamiet

I think scum had a role that showed all the PM's people got from the GM on N2 (or N1 but that doesnt explain everything).

Brainbomb was softing to be able to use that shit. But instead they decided to go with something else. He used the syntax to both get a response from the real town protective, and to try and fake being a real town PR.

That might mean that foodcoats is also scum if it was indeed used on N2

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4174 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 12:05 pm

It -could- also explain why EMC went from no result to "you werent able to reach the person" if they figured out most of everyone else in the meanwhile

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 5014
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4175 Post by foodcoats » Mon May 04, 2020 12:07 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:04 pm
I have a working theory jamiet

I think scum had a role that showed all the PM's people got from the GM on N2 (or N1 but that doesnt explain everything).

Brainbomb was softing to be able to use that shit. But instead they decided to go with something else. He used the syntax to both get a response from the real town protective, and to try and fake being a real town PR.

That might mean that foodcoats is also scum if it was indeed used on N2
Why am I scum? What have I said about N2 or today on D3 that implies I am using some kind of tool like that to make statements about PRs?

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4176 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 12:08 pm

So, RHK - you probably hold some knowledge to whether we need to destroy brainbomb here

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4177 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 12:09 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:07 pm
Vecna wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:04 pm
I have a working theory jamiet

I think scum had a role that showed all the PM's people got from the GM on N2 (or N1 but that doesnt explain everything).

Brainbomb was softing to be able to use that shit. But instead they decided to go with something else. He used the syntax to both get a response from the real town protective, and to try and fake being a real town PR.

That might mean that foodcoats is also scum if it was indeed used on N2
Why am I scum? What have I said about N2 or today on D3 that implies I am using some kind of tool like that to make statements about PRs?
If scum knew to use it N2 instead of N1 they knew it was about to be messed with by a lightning Rod.

RHK, what night did you get that message that your help was not needed? The one where brainbomb mightve faked the syntax?

This could be the key to breaking this thing wide open

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 5014
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4178 Post by foodcoats » Mon May 04, 2020 12:09 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:04 pm
I have a working theory jamiet

I think scum had a role that showed all the PM's people got from the GM on N2 (or N1 but that doesnt explain everything).

Brainbomb was softing to be able to use that shit. But instead they decided to go with something else. He used the syntax to both get a response from the real town protective, and to try and fake being a real town PR.

That might mean that foodcoats is also scum if it was indeed used on N2
This also seems like a complicated, convoluted way to get to scum, and is a big assumption that could lead you or others down blind rabbit holes to mislynches. I think it is ridiculous and even dangerous to look at things with this kind of totally random hypothesizing.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4179 Post by xorxes » Mon May 04, 2020 12:10 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 11:28 am
xorxes wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 2:13 am
foodcoats wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 7:01 pm


Yeah, it happens before any other roleblocking abilities.
@food, can you tell us if your role is described as roleblocking-type?
Why would that matter? It seems to me you suggested earlier that this setup isn't balanced by the roles. So what does it matter to you how many X types and Y types there are? What could you learn from that, since you don't think the game is rationally structured?
I think there can't be two town roleblockers. If you are a roleblocker, any other roleblocker would have to be scum. And you would be town because town roleblocker has priority. Your wording suggests you are classified as a roleblocker. Is that correct?

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#4180 Post by Vecna » Mon May 04, 2020 12:11 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:09 pm
Vecna wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:04 pm
I have a working theory jamiet

I think scum had a role that showed all the PM's people got from the GM on N2 (or N1 but that doesnt explain everything).

Brainbomb was softing to be able to use that shit. But instead they decided to go with something else. He used the syntax to both get a response from the real town protective, and to try and fake being a real town PR.

That might mean that foodcoats is also scum if it was indeed used on N2
This also seems like a complicated, convoluted way to get to scum, and is a big assumption that could lead you or others down blind rabbit holes to mislynches. I think it is ridiculous and even dangerous to look at things with this kind of totally random hypothesizing.
Its not random

Brainbomb was very clearly softing it

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Google [Bot], Hominidae