M1010 Mini-Mafia

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
SarahK24
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:49 am
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3121 Post by SarahK24 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:05 pm

worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:01 pm
SarahK24 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:52 pm
worcej wrote:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:57 pm
##vote bozo
Hey, I know this was a while ago, but what was the reasoning behind this? Was it just because he voted you?
If I am getting attacked for not reading close enough, I find it interesting you're not under the same scrutiny.
Well, I never criticized you.
Also...I was going around I couldn't find it.... would you mind repeating

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3122 Post by xorxes » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:07 pm

worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:01 pm
SarahK24 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:52 pm
worcej wrote:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:57 pm
##vote bozo
Hey, I know this was a while ago, but what was the reasoning behind this? Was it just because he voted you?
If I am getting attacked for not reading close enough, I find it interesting you're not under the same scrutiny.
Do you really believe it's reasonable we should expect the same from her as from you?

It's not what you were advocating at the start of the game.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3123 Post by worcej » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:08 pm

SarahK24 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:05 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:01 pm
SarahK24 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:52 pm


Hey, I know this was a while ago, but what was the reasoning behind this? Was it just because he voted you?
If I am getting attacked for not reading close enough, I find it interesting you're not under the same scrutiny.
Well, I never criticized you.
Also...I was going around I couldn't find it.... would you mind repeating
It isn't you who has been up my butt about not paying attention.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3124 Post by worcej » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:14 pm

xorxes wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:07 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:01 pm
SarahK24 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:52 pm


Hey, I know this was a while ago, but what was the reasoning behind this? Was it just because he voted you?
If I am getting attacked for not reading close enough, I find it interesting you're not under the same scrutiny.
Do you really believe it's reasonable we should expect the same from her as from you?

It's not what you were advocating at the start of the game.
I just find it interesting that we seem to all have different bars on your ladder of expectations. Makes it pretty easy to move the bars if you don't have some that are the same across the board.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3125 Post by bozotheclown » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:16 pm

xorxes wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:01 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:50 pm
xorxes wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:42 pm

What do you make of worcej defending Fox when he claimed scum?

What do you think of their "frustration" today? Was it fake or real? It seemed real to me until worcej's reaction to Sarah, which seemed way over the top.
At the time I thought worcej could be doing that because he knew Foxcastle was town, which is still possible if I am wrong about Foxcastle.

I think their "frustration" is NAI. Foxcastle waiting until last to vote is scum indicative. He spent the day trying to figure out who he had the best chance of getting lynched.
If only one of them is scum, I have trouble seeing who is their partner. Neither is a good match for Sarah, and neither is a good match for you (unless lots of bussing). So it would have to be with brainbomb, if damo is town.

Waiting to vote makes sense if he wants to survive at all costs, which is contradictory with him saying it's bad to keep him for lylo. So yeah.
Foxcastle/brainbomb is possible, with Foxcastle, brainbomb, and Jamie as a scum team, you would expect them to bus each other. rdrivera thought it was you and Foxcastle, which could be right. I would still go with Foxcastle/worcej, but I do not understand why everyone moved to vote with Foxcastle.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3126 Post by bozotheclown » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:20 pm

##VOTE Foxcastle

I am OK lynching Foxcastle or worcej today, but I am switching to Foxcastle because he seemed to be the preference of those I think are town.

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3127 Post by damo666 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:20 pm

@bozo & @Xorxes

are you around for EOD?

I've a feeling it may be important. There could be last minute movement if Fox or Sarah are bussing brain. (Or me or Xorxes for the completeness freaks).

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3128 Post by bozotheclown » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:21 pm

damo666 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:20 pm
@bozo & @Xorxes

are you around for EOD?

I've a feeling it may be important. There could be last minute movement if Fox or Sarah are bussing brain. (Or me or Xorxes for the completeness freaks).
I except to be on at EOD.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3129 Post by Foxcastle » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:22 pm

xorxes wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:01 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:50 pm
xorxes wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:42 pm

What do you make of worcej defending Fox when he claimed scum?

What do you think of their "frustration" today? Was it fake or real? It seemed real to me until worcej's reaction to Sarah, which seemed way over the top.
At the time I thought worcej could be doing that because he knew Foxcastle was town, which is still possible if I am wrong about Foxcastle.

I think their "frustration" is NAI. Foxcastle waiting until last to vote is scum indicative. He spent the day trying to figure out who he had the best chance of getting lynched.
If only one of them is scum, I have trouble seeing who is their partner. Neither is a good match for Sarah, and neither is a good match for you (unless lots of bussing). So it would have to be with brainbomb, if damo is town.

Waiting to vote makes sense if he wants to survive at all costs, which is contradictory with him saying it's bad to keep him for lylo. So yeah.
I am not saying it's bad to keep me alive at LyLo. :x I am saying that there are two paths here: one with me in LyLo and one without me, and Town needs to weigh those two options and the different risks they bring. And yes, there are risks with other options. Those can be weighed too.

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3130 Post by damo666 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:25 pm

Xpost with Bozo kind of makes my last post a bit redundant.

However I still think it important that townies be available at EOD (unless we get a runaway wagon but I think that unlikely).

I will be here.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3131 Post by xorxes » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:31 pm

damo666 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:20 pm
@bozo & @Xorxes

are you around for EOD?

I've a feeling it may be important. There could be last minute movement if Fox or Sarah are bussing brain. (Or me or Xorxes for the completeness freaks).
I expect to be here, yes.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3132 Post by xorxes » Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:41 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 5:43 pm

It is possible brainbomb is scum, but I would be surprised. I do not see what he would be trying to accomplish D1 EOD if Jamie was his partner.
What do you mean? When he was claiming Vengeful with a target on Jamie? Wouldn't that be just part of their show (if that's what it was)? Claiming PR could be giving Jamie an excuse not to vote for him.

SarahK24
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:49 am
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3133 Post by SarahK24 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:01 pm

worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:14 pm
xorxes wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:07 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:01 pm
If I am getting attacked for not reading close enough, I find it interesting you're not under the same scrutiny.
Do you really believe it's reasonable we should expect the same from her as from you?

It's not what you were advocating at the start of the game.
I just find it interesting that we seem to all have different bars on your ladder of expectations. Makes it pretty easy to move the bars if you don't have some that are the same across the board.
Like what???
Sometimes I just feel like asking because i forgot and I just want to know geez

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3134 Post by worcej » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:28 pm

SarahK24 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:01 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:14 pm
xorxes wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:07 pm


Do you really believe it's reasonable we should expect the same from her as from you?

It's not what you were advocating at the start of the game.
I just find it interesting that we seem to all have different bars on your ladder of expectations. Makes it pretty easy to move the bars if you don't have some that are the same across the board.
Like what???
Sometimes I just feel like asking because i forgot and I just want to know geez
I am confused by your question.

I think it is interesting to note that xorxes indicates he has a different set of expectations from each person he is evaluating as possible scum. For some context, I approach an analysis on each person by looking at their actions and if they are behaving differently over the course of a game, then move to motivation and possible reasoning. It is the same bar for each person.

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3135 Post by damo666 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:31 pm

worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:28 pm
SarahK24 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:01 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 6:14 pm
I just find it interesting that we seem to all have different bars on your ladder of expectations. Makes it pretty easy to move the bars if you don't have some that are the same across the board.
Like what???
Sometimes I just feel like asking because i forgot and I just want to know geez
I am confused by your question.

I think it is interesting to note that xorxes indicates he has a different set of expectations from each person he is evaluating as possible scum. For some context, I approach an analysis on each person by looking at their actions and if they are behaving differently over the course of a game, then move to motivation and possible reasoning. It is the same bar for each person.
@worcej is it not reasonable to have different expectations of an experienced player and a noob?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3136 Post by worcej » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:36 pm

damo666 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:31 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:28 pm
SarahK24 wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:01 pm


Like what???
Sometimes I just feel like asking because i forgot and I just want to know geez
I am confused by your question.

I think it is interesting to note that xorxes indicates he has a different set of expectations from each person he is evaluating as possible scum. For some context, I approach an analysis on each person by looking at their actions and if they are behaving differently over the course of a game, then move to motivation and possible reasoning. It is the same bar for each person.
@worcej is it not reasonable to have different expectations of an experienced player and a noob?
It is after a certain point - to continue to just look at her differently without any adjustment as the game goes on is a critical issue in any games. This is why Flavius came in on his first scum game and none of us (as far as I recall) believed him to be scum at the time and we ultimately lost thinking that way.

But beyond her, it seems to me that xorxes may have different baseline expectations for each individual person. I am pointing that out as being convenient because he could move them at will with little recourse.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3137 Post by xorxes » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:45 pm

worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:36 pm
But beyond her, it seems to me that xorxes may have different baseline expectations for each individual person. I am pointing that out as being convenient because he could move them at will with little recourse.
I most definitely have different expectations for each person. I think most/all of us do. I expect brainbomb to be the top poster of the game, for example. When he isn't, something is strange. I'm not all that surprized if rivera is the lowest poster. So my expectations for rivera and brainbomb are pretty much opposite in that regard. I expect you to read the thread because even when you are several pages behind you almost make it a point to let us know that you are reading everything. So when you don't, that's noticeable.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3138 Post by worcej » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:49 pm

In other news - my work network finally got smart and blocked peterbot as games. If they block webdip I will need to become significantly better at reading the game via mobile...

SarahK24
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:49 am
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3139 Post by SarahK24 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:50 pm

worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:49 pm
In other news - my work network finally got smart and blocked peterbot as games. If they block webdip I will need to become significantly better at reading the game via mobile...
Ouch....
I use my phone most of the time tbh😅

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#3140 Post by worcej » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:54 pm

xorxes wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:45 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:36 pm
But beyond her, it seems to me that xorxes may have different baseline expectations for each individual person. I am pointing that out as being convenient because he could move them at will with little recourse.
I most definitely have different expectations for each person. I think most/all of us do. I expect brainbomb to be the top poster of the game, for example. When he isn't, something is strange. I'm not all that surprized if rivera is the lowest poster. So my expectations for rivera and brainbomb are pretty much opposite in that regard. I expect you to read the thread because even when you are several pages behind you almost make it a point to let us know that you are reading everything. So when you don't, that's noticeable.
I only did not do that because people expressed it is annoying when I did. So which is it?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], Hominidae