M1010 Mini-Mafia

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1781 Post by xorxes » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:40 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:25 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:22 pm
For what it's worth, I think your error here is a huge towntell on you.
Which error?
His reads were actually kgray's reads.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1782 Post by xorxes » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:41 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:32 pm
xorxes wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:43 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:30 pm


Shall we cut off his head?
If bo is JOAT it is better to lynch him first though.
why do you suppose he is joat? what evidence suggests he is lol
I'm not supposing anything, I'm just saying that's what Fox claimed.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1783 Post by xorxes » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:42 pm

@Fox, can we have an update of your own reads now?

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1784 Post by Foxcastle » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:44 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:39 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:31 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:25 pm


Which error?
About my read on SarahK.
You claim I made an "error" yet you are refusing to explain.

How are you helping town by this behaviour?
Well, I'm not going to do your work for you, Jamiet. That wouldn't teach you anything. I have basically pointed out exactly where you need to look, and yet you have not even bothered! I really hope you a better work ethic than this to your PhD, otherwise I fear I will need to put in a word of warning to your advisor.

But, on the question of how it helps town, it did help me to establish a very strong townread on you. I hope others will see it too.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1785 Post by worcej » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:47 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 09, 2020 11:57 pm
this is very eerily like last game in most respects
How so exactly? Eerily like 'a prominent town player is actually scum' or 'egos are clashing and not listening'?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1786 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:47 pm

xorxes wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:40 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:25 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:22 pm
For what it's worth, I think your error here is a huge towntell on you.
Which error?
His reads were actually kgray's reads.
You mean the post on Page 85 was just meant to be a summary of what Kgray's reads had been?

Huh. I would suggest that Foxcastle erred by failing to communicate clearly. It looked to me as if he made a remark about the NK on Kgray, and then proceeded to give some reads.

Why couldn't he just clarify what he meant?

Why all the evasion and obfuscation?

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1787 Post by xorxes » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:47 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:22 pm
For what it's worth, I think your error here is a huge towntell on you.
How? Why couldn't scum have made the same mistake? It could be a towntell if you are scum, but I don't see how it's a towntell if you are town.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1788 Post by worcej » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:48 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 12:56 am
I’m just curious why you’re being shady rather than solvy, Bozo.
Because he is scum.

##vote bozo

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1789 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:49 pm

All poor or potentially misleading communication is a reaction test that is the responsibility of the reader.

Sure.

I'm going out for a walk.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1790 Post by worcej » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:49 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 12:59 am
Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 12:57 am
##VOTE BOZO
Bozo, Brainbomb, and Damo.
Definitely, most likely not but hard to tell, leaning that direction at current read through.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1791 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:49 pm

worcej wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:48 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 12:56 am
I’m just curious why you’re being shady rather than solvy, Bozo.
Because he is scum.

##vote bozo
I'm sure that's not the answer Bozo was about to give.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1792 Post by xorxes » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:53 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:47 pm
xorxes wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:40 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:25 pm


Which error?
His reads were actually kgray's reads.
You mean the post on Page 85 was just meant to be a summary of what Kgray's reads had been?

Huh. I would suggest that Foxcastle erred by failing to communicate clearly. It looked to me as if he made a remark about the NK on Kgray, and then proceeded to give some reads.

Why couldn't he just clarify what he meant?

Why all the evasion and obfuscation?
First time I read it, it was clear to me he was reporting her reads. When you quoted it I did not remember that. So I don't think there was a problem with the initial post. Him basking in your mistake was a little silly but probably NAI.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1793 Post by worcej » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:54 pm

xorxes wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:12 am
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:06 am
xorxes wrote:
Thu Apr 09, 2020 11:41 pm


OK... I won't be pushing for your lynch today, anyway. I think we have to lynch bo_sox first.

##VOTE bo_sox
I agree with you but I fear we just lose if Bo isn't scum. Are you so sure to take this risk?
Is there a less risky option? He is my strongest scumread.

Sarah, Fox, damo, brain and you are people I'm not too confident in (roughly in that order).

bozo, worcej, Jamie, emc I would say are town, but I could be wrong.
Why do you town bozo?

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1794 Post by Foxcastle » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:56 pm

xorxes wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:42 pm
@Fox, can we have an update of your own reads now?
I am less sure on Bo at the moment. I did think he was town, but I don't think he's gotten townier since yesterday, so that's a problem. Brain is also a weird question in the same vein, based on his antics, but I lean a little more townie on him.

Xorxes is town. Worcej and EMC seem townie to me. SarahK does not seem like noob scum, so she gets a townread. My gut read of Rdrivera is scum, but as I have learned, my gut read of him is reversed, so I'm tentatively marking him town.

Damo is the one that I think is scummiest in the range of "trying to look normal." I've gone sour on Bozo—I think he could be scum, because he's playing very poorly. I think he plays much better as town, and he played very well last game as scum when he didn't know his teammates.

Here's why I think Jamiet is town: scum would have been paying close attention to Kgray's reads, and paying close attention to people who were going back to try to dissect her reads. So I think in general that scum would have recognized that I was quoting Kgray's reads. Jamiet confused my summary of Kgray's reads for my own, ergo, Jamiet was not paying close attention to Kgray's reads, from which we conclude he is not scum.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1795 Post by worcej » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:56 pm

bo_sox48 wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:20 am
Rdrivera is making no sense right now.
I am actually seeing a logical train of thought, but it is pretty ruthless (wanting to lynch Sarah for getting rid of a potential liability) and I am not used to seeing that side of rdr.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1796 Post by Foxcastle » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:58 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:49 pm
All poor or potentially misleading communication is a reaction test that is the responsibility of the reader.

Sure.

I'm going out for a walk.
I quote Kgray's posts, I made comments about Kgray's posts, I made a closing summary of my views on what scum may have intended for Kgray's reads. I can't help it if you need more context clues than that.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1797 Post by Foxcastle » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:00 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:47 pm
xorxes wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:40 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:25 pm


Which error?
His reads were actually kgray's reads.
You mean the post on Page 85 was just meant to be a summary of what Kgray's reads had been?

Huh. I would suggest that Foxcastle erred by failing to communicate clearly. It looked to me as if he made a remark about the NK on Kgray, and then proceeded to give some reads.

Why couldn't he just clarify what he meant?

Why all the evasion and obfuscation?
I'll let you answer for me:
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 09, 2020 12:46 pm
That's easy. I'm an asshole.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1798 Post by xorxes » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:00 pm

worcej wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:54 pm
xorxes wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:12 am
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:06 am


I agree with you but I fear we just lose if Bo isn't scum. Are you so sure to take this risk?
Is there a less risky option? He is my strongest scumread.

Sarah, Fox, damo, brain and you are people I'm not too confident in (roughly in that order).

bozo, worcej, Jamie, emc I would say are town, but I could be wrong.
Why do you town bozo?
Because his pushes have made sense to me. I will reread him to make sure I'm not being bamboozled. Without using the word "cautious", why do you scumread him?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1799 Post by worcej » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:00 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:38 am
yall just need to stop suckin ass at mafia, cryin out ya buttholes everytime a PR dies like its a greek tradgedy
Who was exactly crying because of the PR deaths?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1800 Post by worcej » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:03 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:45 am
brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2020 1:44 am
I hope all the prs die today
You have done nothing but talk about PRs all game.

You are obsessed with PRs.

Shut up about them, then.
He may be now, but you started the PR comments on D1 before anyone else did.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Hominidae