Mini Mafia II: Shakespeare Mash Game Thread

[ghug]

I keep forgetting this game exists. This should be good evidence that I'm town.

I think Fox is probably town just cause his claimant logic is so shit.

I want go get bo, Durga, or Ezio today.

Explain.

And what did Durga say yesterday townie? Why are you so awful this game?

I think you have me confused with yourself. She asked if it was role madness.

[brainbomb]

ghug (3) Ezio, Foxcastle, VashtaNeurotic
bo_sox48 (1) ghug
Vecna (1) Durga

End-votes (0/6): -

Non-votes. bozotheclown, bo_sox48, rdrivera2005, reedeer1, thamrick, Vecna

Ghug is set to be lynched

[bo_sox48]

This game is annoying

[Vecna]

Good evening my rowdy thralls,

Your wise leader Ceasar has been occupied by the indulging in all the vices that Rome has to offer (many as they may be), and is now tired and in need of rest. I have petitioned the senate to capture the fool that decided that the royal executions shall take place during the night in Rome. Him awaits a particularly unpleasant time in the stockades.

As for those mutinous donkeys complaining about Ceasar's absence, and using it as an excuse to try and incite the masses to riot......consider yourself under suspicion and royal scrutiny for your opportunism. Ceasar has clearly demonstrated his reasoning and motives, and trying to undermine his authority only serves the barbarian hordes.

##vote Ghug

[Vecna]

Senator Bosoxious, might we parley now that you are still around?

I would prefer to shift the execution towards a different scroungy dog, if you will continue to push my effort while I am retreat for the night. Leaving a single vote and then leaving however feels like a wasted effort.

[thamrick]

IIRC he voted me because I never vote so recklessly, and in response I voted him.

@Ezio - why did you lie about the order of events with you and yav voting each other? It was literally 8 hours prior to this post.

You voted Yav in what was seemingly a joke vote:

##vote yav for questioning my motives.

Yav didn't even address you specifically. Then Yav responded:

##vote Ezio for voting like a foolish.

[ghug]

You'd prefer not to lynch the leading vote-getter, so you vote for me and make it 4-1-1? Great...

Has anyone given anything remotely resembling an actual reason for voting for me?

[thamrick]

What is Durga doing?
But first,
WHAT IS EZIO DOING?

This was after Durga said "Feel free to lynch me. Bye" and Ezio immediately voted her.

Why was yav so worked up about this? This makes me think Durga might be scum.


But ghug's subtle yav protection after that definitely deserves more attention.

I don't think I've ever not been suspicious of someone voting yavuz day one.

##VOTE ghug

[thamrick]

@bo - still claim to be town vanillizer? Were you told whether your target would be notified that they were vanillized? One-shot power?

[Durga]

WOAH no CLAIMS

[thamrick]

I keep forgetting this game exists. This should be good evidence that I'm town.

I think Fox is probably town just cause his claimant logic is so shit.

I want go get bo, Durga, or Ezio today.

Explain.

And what did Durga say yesterday townie? Why are you so awful this game?

I think you have me confused with yourself. She asked if it was role madness.

Why is that a townie comment? You also didn't explain why Foxy's claimant logic is shit

[thamrick]

WOAH no CLAIMS

Is that directed at me? Because I'm talking about what bo claimed at EoD

[bozotheclown]

@bo - still claim to be town vanillizer? Were you told whether your target would be notified that they were vanillized? One-shot power?

Is that a PR role? It thought it was just a way to say VT. What does a vanillizer do?

[Durga]

idk, i thought the GM said we're giving mafia powers no matter what we claim

so can we just stop talking about this shit

[thamrick]

From the OP

<><><><><><><><><><>
There are no millers, the mafia can chat at all times, there is no roleblock, there is a factional kill each night, the mafia have a list of fake claimable flavour names. You may claim roles, flavours, and specifics of your role if you wish; so long as your pm is not restricted, you can make things up too. Some roles may not want to claim, some roles may die if they claim. It is counter to both sides wincons to be forced to claim. If the mafia is defeated the game is not necessarily over. If someone dies their flavour is revealed, their alignment is revealed, their role is not.
<><><><><><><><><><>
That is all I can say.
Do not ask anything in game about the above.
<><><><><><><><><><><>

[Durga]

##call brain gm
so it says "counter to both win cons to be forced to claim"
1. what constitutes being forced to claim
2. what constitutes a claim
3. once its claimed, does it matter how much we discuss/probe for more details?

[bozotheclown]

Maybe thamrick was bussing yavuzovic.

##VOTE thamrick

[ghug]

But ghug's subtle yav protection after that definitely deserves more attention.

I don't think I've ever not been suspicious of someone voting yavuz day one.

##VOTE ghug

How is this subtle?

ghug wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 12:36 pm
thamrick wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 11:55 am
ghug wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 11:45 am
I keep forgetting this game exists. This should be good evidence that I'm town.

I think Fox is probably town just cause his claimant logic is so shit.

I want go get bo, Durga, or Ezio today.
Explain.

And what did Durga say yesterday townie? Why are you so awful this game?
I think you have me confused with yourself. She asked if it was role madness.
Why is that a townie comment? You also didn't explain why Foxy's claimant logic is shit

Why would scum assume that it's role madness? Those are the words of a townie with a role.

Fox's shit about the king isn't something I could see scum bothering to come up with either. It's not informative enough to be misinformative, and there's no way it directly gets him town cred.

[Durga]

You're wrong, I'm definitely not a townie with a role

[VashtaNeurotic]

Oh I need another post. Damn