M1010 Mini-Mafia

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1061 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:22 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:16 pm
One possibility I see is that bo_sox and Foxcastle are scum and SK24 is town who drove them both to overreactions because of the coincidental timing of her vote.

Another possibility is that bo_sox, Foxcastle, and SK24 are all town. In this case, BunnyGo is probably scum, taking the opportunity to correctly declare bo_sox and Foxcastle are town. Or, it could be worcej, who has essentially done the same thing, although it is unlikely to be both. The other scum would probably be taking the the opportunity to vote for bo_sox or Foxcastle, such as Jamie, brainbomb, xorxes, and rdrivera.

Or, bo_sox and SK24 could be scum, with or without Foxcastle.
I don't see why scum!bo_sox would freak out if Sarah was town though. Why would he care that much about the situation?

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1062 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:23 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:21 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:19 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:02 pm


You cannot qualify uniqueness. It either is or isn't. A bit like being scum. you either are or you are not.
Sometimes people do qualify scum: "non-PZ scum" for instance.

You can also qualify uniqueness in the sense that something can be unique in more or less relevant properties. So something unique in a more relevant property can be said to be more unique than something unique in something less relevant.

The sentence in question, for example has already appeared three times in this thread, which someone might argue makes it no longer quite unique, but in another sense it is still unique enough.
What's the point of this? The joke phase ended a while ago.
That was not a joke, that was useful life information.

SarahK24
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:49 am
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1063 Post by SarahK24 » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:23 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:19 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:02 pm
SarahK24 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 6:59 pm


I agree that it is quite unique.....
You cannot qualify uniqueness. It either is or isn't. A bit like being scum. you either are or you are not.
Sometimes people do qualify scum: "non-PZ scum" for instance.

You can also qualify uniqueness in the sense that something can be unique in more or less relevant properties. So something unique in a more relevant property can be said to be more unique than something unique in something less relevant.

The sentence in question, for example has already appeared three times in this thread, which someone might argue makes it no longer quite unique, but in another sense it is still unique enough.
Why did u feel the need to do this..... just why

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1064 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:24 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:21 pm

What's the point of this? The joke phase ended a while ago.
Did your scum claim come before or after the joke phase was over?

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1065 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:24 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:24 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:21 pm

What's the point of this? The joke phase ended a while ago.
Did your scum claim come before or after the joke phase was over?
Definitely after

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1066 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:24 pm

I do not like worcej's reasons for voting for me, and if worcej is scum, BunnyGo is likely town. If so, one scum is probably voting for BunnyGo.

Since bo_sox has now passed Foxcastle:

##VOTE bo_sox

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1067 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:26 pm

SarahK24 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:23 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:19 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:02 pm


You cannot qualify uniqueness. It either is or isn't. A bit like being scum. you either are or you are not.
Sometimes people do qualify scum: "non-PZ scum" for instance.

You can also qualify uniqueness in the sense that something can be unique in more or less relevant properties. So something unique in a more relevant property can be said to be more unique than something unique in something less relevant.

The sentence in question, for example has already appeared three times in this thread, which someone might argue makes it no longer quite unique, but in another sense it is still unique enough.
Why did u feel the need to do this..... just why
Why do you think?

Why did you feel the need to agree with damo that Bunny's sentence was (quite) unique?

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1068 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:27 pm

Is flippant Xorxes town or scum?

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1069 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:28 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:24 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:24 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:21 pm

What's the point of this? The joke phase ended a while ago.
Did your scum claim come before or after the joke phase was over?
Definitely after
That's what I thought.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1070 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:28 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:22 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:16 pm
One possibility I see is that bo_sox and Foxcastle are scum and SK24 is town who drove them both to overreactions because of the coincidental timing of her vote.

Another possibility is that bo_sox, Foxcastle, and SK24 are all town. In this case, BunnyGo is probably scum, taking the opportunity to correctly declare bo_sox and Foxcastle are town. Or, it could be worcej, who has essentially done the same thing, although it is unlikely to be both. The other scum would probably be taking the the opportunity to vote for bo_sox or Foxcastle, such as Jamie, brainbomb, xorxes, and rdrivera.

Or, bo_sox and SK24 could be scum, with or without Foxcastle.
I don't see why scum!bo_sox would freak out if Sarah was town though. Why would he care that much about the situation?
Her vote for Foxcastle 3 minutes after his made him look suspect, if he is scum and that was just a coincidence, that would be frustrating.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1071 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:29 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:24 pm
I do not like worcej's reasons for voting for me, and if worcej is scum, BunnyGo is likely town. If so, one scum is probably voting for BunnyGo.

Since bo_sox has now passed Foxcastle:

##VOTE bo_sox
worcej could be voting for you for bad reasons even if he was town.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1072 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:30 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:27 pm
Is flippant Xorxes town or scum?
NAI

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1073 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:31 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:29 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:24 pm
I do not like worcej's reasons for voting for me, and if worcej is scum, BunnyGo is likely town. If so, one scum is probably voting for BunnyGo.

Since bo_sox has now passed Foxcastle:

##VOTE bo_sox
worcej could be voting for you for bad reasons even if he was town.
Possible, but they are bad enough that I suspect they are not real.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1074 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:32 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:28 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:22 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:16 pm
One possibility I see is that bo_sox and Foxcastle are scum and SK24 is town who drove them both to overreactions because of the coincidental timing of her vote.

Another possibility is that bo_sox, Foxcastle, and SK24 are all town. In this case, BunnyGo is probably scum, taking the opportunity to correctly declare bo_sox and Foxcastle are town. Or, it could be worcej, who has essentially done the same thing, although it is unlikely to be both. The other scum would probably be taking the the opportunity to vote for bo_sox or Foxcastle, such as Jamie, brainbomb, xorxes, and rdrivera.

Or, bo_sox and SK24 could be scum, with or without Foxcastle.
I don't see why scum!bo_sox would freak out if Sarah was town though. Why would he care that much about the situation?
Her vote for Foxcastle 3 minutes after his made him look suspect, if he is scum and that was just a coincidence, that would be frustrating.
Not enough to produce a reaction like that. He would even welcome being tied to a townie in that way.

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1075 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:36 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:16 pm
One possibility I see is that bo_sox and Foxcastle are scum and SK24 is town who drove them both to overreactions because of the coincidental timing of her vote.

Another possibility is that bo_sox, Foxcastle, and SK24 are all town. In this case, BunnyGo is probably scum, taking the opportunity to correctly declare bo_sox and Foxcastle are town. Or, it could be worcej, who has essentially done the same thing, although it is unlikely to be both. The other scum would probably be taking the the opportunity to vote for bo_sox or Foxcastle, such as Jamie, brainbomb, xorxes, and rdrivera.

Or, bo_sox and SK24 could be scum, with or without Foxcastle.
What's your play going to be when I flip town?

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1076 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:36 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:32 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:28 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:22 pm


I don't see why scum!bo_sox would freak out if Sarah was town though. Why would he care that much about the situation?
Her vote for Foxcastle 3 minutes after his made him look suspect, if he is scum and that was just a coincidence, that would be frustrating.
Not enough to produce a reaction like that. He would even welcome being tied to a townie in that way.
Even if he was bussing Foxcastle and SK24's vote made both of them look suspect?

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1077 Post by damo666 » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:36 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:19 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:02 pm
SarahK24 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 6:59 pm


I agree that it is quite unique.....
You cannot qualify uniqueness. It either is or isn't. A bit like being scum. you either are or you are not.
Sometimes people do qualify scum: "non-PZ scum" for instance.

You can also qualify uniqueness in the sense that something can be unique in more or less relevant properties. So something unique in a more relevant property can be said to be more unique than something unique in something less relevant.

The sentence in question, for example has already appeared three times in this thread, which someone might argue makes it no longer quite unique, but in another sense it is still unique enough.
It was unique.

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1078 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:38 pm

bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:36 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:16 pm
One possibility I see is that bo_sox and Foxcastle are scum and SK24 is town who drove them both to overreactions because of the coincidental timing of her vote.

Another possibility is that bo_sox, Foxcastle, and SK24 are all town. In this case, BunnyGo is probably scum, taking the opportunity to correctly declare bo_sox and Foxcastle are town. Or, it could be worcej, who has essentially done the same thing, although it is unlikely to be both. The other scum would probably be taking the the opportunity to vote for bo_sox or Foxcastle, such as Jamie, brainbomb, xorxes, and rdrivera.

Or, bo_sox and SK24 could be scum, with or without Foxcastle.
What's your play going to be when I flip town?
Additionally, do you plan on asking me any questions? I've been waiting patiently. That goes for xorxes, Jamie, and rdrivera as well.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1079 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:39 pm

bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:36 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:16 pm
One possibility I see is that bo_sox and Foxcastle are scum and SK24 is town who drove them both to overreactions because of the coincidental timing of her vote.

Another possibility is that bo_sox, Foxcastle, and SK24 are all town. In this case, BunnyGo is probably scum, taking the opportunity to correctly declare bo_sox and Foxcastle are town. Or, it could be worcej, who has essentially done the same thing, although it is unlikely to be both. The other scum would probably be taking the the opportunity to vote for bo_sox or Foxcastle, such as Jamie, brainbomb, xorxes, and rdrivera.

Or, bo_sox and SK24 could be scum, with or without Foxcastle.
What's your play going to be when I flip town?
I would have to reevaluate with that new information plus whatever other new information we get. Are you implying you think I am scum and I am planning out a series of mislynches?

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: M1010 Mini-Mafia

#1080 Post by xorxes » Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:40 pm

@worcej: I don't think you ever reacted to Sarah's opinion that Fox was conspiring with you. Were you not the least bit curious about what made her think that?

@Sarah, what made you think that? Can you point to one post that gave you that idea?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], DreamTrawler, Ernst_Brenner, JustAGuyNamedWill