Mini Mafia II: Shakespeare Mash Game Thread

[bozotheclown]

yavuzovic responding to thamrick by voting for him looks questionable.

##VOTE yavuzovic

[brainbomb]

GM NOTE: If Vash does not meet posting requirements he will be placed into a delinquent category.

If he becomes delinquent
He must post 5 times in the night, or will be modkilled start of day 2.

We do not have a subs list.

Alternatively if he fails to meet requirements I may force him to stop spiking his hair as its not 1997 anymore.

[thamrick]

yavuzovic responding to thamrick by voting for him looks questionable.

##VOTE yavuzovic

But him voting Ezio after Ezio voted him wasn't questionable? What?

##Vote bozo

[ghug]

I don't think I've ever not been suspicious of someone voting yavuz day one.

[thamrick]

I don't think I've ever not been suspicious of someone voting yavuz day one.

Normally I'd agree. Does he not seem different to you though? Like yavuz gonna yavuz, but yavuz isn't yavuz'ing iykwim

[thamrick]

I agree though. I don't like how easily others jumped on

[bo_sox48]

In fairness, I would vote him too if I were stupid, had no idea what I was doing in general, and hadn't read anything other than someone else being critical of yavuz.

[thamrick]

@bo - scumreads?

[bo_sox48]

Ezio, but I always scumread him, and I have a sneaking suspicion about darg but I can't place why.

[bo_sox48]

I'm going to look and see if I can write up a case on Ezio in a little while.

[ghug]

Bo's scum. ##VOTE bo

[dargorygel]

So obviously the vote on Vashta didn't bring him rushing to defend himself. And it looks like he is going to be God-killed.

And probably voting for the least-posting player here doesn't seem like the most driving reason. The setup is odd enough that it might be making people less 'posty.'

Bozo seems shockingly uninvolved so far. But that is not a scum indicator in this set-up, necessarily.

I'm inclined not to lynch Caesar. And perhaps the vote on him is a way for a claimant to move up the line, but THAT is probably not scum-indicative either.

Ezio hasn't asked for a no-lynch. But since I usually scum-read him for pushing that TOO hard, it doesn't seem fair to push him for NOT no-lynching in this game.

Caesar has asked for foxy's head. And this is day 1. This is a hard set up to make assumptions in.
But I am following Caesar's lead at this point.

I'll be around at EoD, I think. Hoping to be reasoned with.

##VOTE Foxcastle
(I am willing to go back to Vash, if others will vote there, too. He has a reprieve, apparently, and won't be killed out until after night. So his lurking still could be a scum hiding.)

[ghug]

Darg is probably number 2.

[Foxcastle]

Well, I'm not going to be around at end of day, but my lynch doesn't tell us much. Vecna's could, though, given that he's all gung-ho about _something_.

Yavuz could be a good choice; he's playing a little differently than usual, but I'm not sure if that's scummy, or just that he's evolving as he plays, or because this setup is unusual. I'm willing to hold off.

Which just leaves ##vote bo_sox

[thamrick]

Well, I'm not going to be around at end of day, but my lynch doesn't tell us much. Vecna's could, though, given that he's all gung-ho about _something_.

Yavuz could be a good choice; he's playing a little differently than usual, but I'm not sure if that's scummy, or just that he's evolving as he plays, or because this setup is unusual. I'm willing to hold off.

Which just leaves ##vote bo_sox

Why does that leave Bo? I don't disagree, but what's your reasoning?

[thamrick]

So obviously the vote on Vashta didn't bring him rushing to defend himself. And it looks like he is going to be God-killed.

And probably voting for the least-posting player here doesn't seem like the most driving reason. The setup is odd enough that it might be making people less 'posty.'

Bozo seems shockingly uninvolved so far. But that is not a scum indicator in this set-up, necessarily.

I'm inclined not to lynch Caesar. And perhaps the vote on him is a way for a claimant to move up the line, but THAT is probably not scum-indicative either.

Ezio hasn't asked for a no-lynch. But since I usually scum-read him for pushing that TOO hard, it doesn't seem fair to push him for NOT no-lynching in this game.

Caesar has asked for foxy's head. And this is day 1. This is a hard set up to make assumptions in.
But I am following Caesar's lead at this point.

I'll be around at EoD, I think. Hoping to be reasoned with.

##VOTE Foxcastle
(I am willing to go back to Vash, if others will vote there, too. He has a reprieve, apparently, and won't be killed out until after night. So his lurking still could be a scum hiding.)

These are shockingly bad reads.

Lynching a non-poster D1 is obviously bad.

Bozo has posted as much as Ezio, yav, reedeer and Foxcastle, and more than rdr. Why was he singled out?

Even by Caesar's own words, he doesn't want to claim the throne, but wants to choose correctly who does claim the throne.

When was the last time Ezio DID push for a no-lynch?

Why Foxy? Any reason other than that he is questioning Vecna?

[thamrick]

Oh.

@darg - I meant to ask what the line I bolded in your above quote meant

[Ezio]

@Darg I push for NoLynch in situations where NoLynch is good. The last few setups it really hasn't been, including this one. Or I've been scum and therefore incredibly happy to let you guys be dumb d1.

[dargorygel]

@thamrick
I am not enthused about my vote. I am not scumreading anyone strongly. My first suspicions (vecna) didn't end up getting traction. I'll think about him again tomorrow.

But meanwhile, I don't have any grand cases... but neither does anyone else. I am hoping for great insight from someone.

@ezio
Does this game merit a no-lynch in your mind?

[brainbomb]

**Someone has bit their thumb at ghug!!**