MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
He means that he roleblocked me, Peter.
Which, as I've repeated to everyone, is a waste. But at the same time I understand.
Which, as I've repeated to everyone, is a waste. But at the same time I understand.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
I think scum are just trying to keep this up. My guess is goldie is actual BH. ##vote worcej
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
What about the second warning? Maybe we can shorten the list if we include candidates in both warnings.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 2:42 amGoldie already reposted (though if it matters about the context of surrounding posts I think we're going to have a hard time retriggering--would also not be very fair to reavers as crossposting is hard to avoid, and not fair to GMs as the search function is really only a post/post basis).xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 1:56 am1) Strongest hypothesis is still goldie. Everything that has happened still fits with the obvious explanation.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 1:47 am
I asked in PM and was told they’d know they were commuted but not if they were attacked or visited. The attacker would not know why they failed. ##CALL GM did I remember this correctly? Also, Xorxes, if we’re going to hunt reavers by EOD I think we need some coordinated efforts:
1) hypotheses that are specific to an assumed RP.
2) an attempt to retrigger an alert, but this requires more buyin than I’ve had. Can we get people to commit? I don’t think we need to repost all of pages 27-32 in order exactly, but if we can organize that it’s be nice.
2) Make a list of the people that would need to repost. Only a few people could be Reaver Prime, and goldie is still the way most likely.
So, of the people who could be RP and trigger the day 1 warning (assuming posts between Kitsune's posts were the issue:
Goldfinger already posted everything (thanks again for being the one person to help me hunt...although that suggests you're a reaver and covering for yourself)
Rdrivera is dead (RIP)
Dargorygel is the watcher (stay away from my wife Badger!)
Xorxes is captain (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger)
Tom is my wife (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger)
Chaqa still needs to post non-conjoined reposts
ND has since scanned as VT (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger--actually, unless our scanner has turned and was lying. Maybe ND should repost.)
Teacon is twin (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger)
Worcej still needs to post
Temasek still needs to post
EMC needs to post
I am Wash (the pilot!) (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger)
Bozo is dead (RIP)
Kalel is dead (RIP)
So....it's a lot. I don't know if quoting matters, order matters, etc. etc. BUT if we can get people doing it, that'd be cool.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
I don't understand. How does the level of the warnings relate to the number of Reavers? Do you know something that we don't?goldfinger0303 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 3:24 am
Also, I'd like to note that we've had a level 1 warning twice now. Meaning there are two reavers. I would assume a second violation would mean a level 2 warning.
If both warnings were level 1, and level indicates the number of Reavers, it suggests that Reaver Prime has not successfully recruited yet.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Fishing?
He said he was the Companion like forever ago..
He said he was the Companion like forever ago..
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
That depends on our hypothesis. I think there are two cases:xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 10:50 amWhat about the second warning? Maybe we can shorten the list if we include candidates in both warnings.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 2:42 amGoldie already reposted (though if it matters about the context of surrounding posts I think we're going to have a hard time retriggering--would also not be very fair to reavers as crossposting is hard to avoid, and not fair to GMs as the search function is really only a post/post basis).
So, of the people who could be RP and trigger the day 1 warning (assuming posts between Kitsune's posts were the issue:
Goldfinger already posted everything (thanks again for being the one person to help me hunt...although that suggests you're a reaver and covering for yourself)
Rdrivera is dead (RIP)
Dargorygel is the watcher (stay away from my wife Badger!)
Xorxes is captain (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger)
Tom is my wife (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger)
Chaqa still needs to post non-conjoined reposts
ND has since scanned as VT (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger--actually, unless our scanner has turned and was lying. Maybe ND should repost.)
Teacon is twin (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger)
Worcej still needs to post
Temasek still needs to post
EMC needs to post
I am Wash (the pilot!) (so not reaver at time...couldn't be the trigger)
Bozo is dead (RIP)
Kalel is dead (RIP)
So....it's a lot. I don't know if quoting matters, order matters, etc. etc. BUT if we can get people doing it, that'd be cool.
1) the level of the warning is the number of times that reaver has erred (in this case it means there are at least 2 reavers.
2) there are different types of infractions. One type is 1. Another is 2.
I personally think it’s more likely that we’re in situation 1. This makes sense for design, and for allowing players second chances (also, what would be penalty for multiple level 1 infractions)?
IF I’m correct, then we actually need a second list of players for the second infraction. Since it must necessarily be by a different reaver (meaning that depending on the delay the GMs add, it could be almost everyone not cleared after the infraction).
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Yes I visited goldfinger last night and am the backup companion. I had no target the night before as I missed the phase due to IRL matters.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Oh true. An interesting 3rd hypothesis.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 10:57 amI don't understand. How does the level of the warnings relate to the number of Reavers? Do you know something that we don't?goldfinger0303 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 3:24 am
Also, I'd like to note that we've had a level 1 warning twice now. Meaning there are two reavers. I would assume a second violation would mean a level 2 warning.
If both warnings were level 1, and level indicates the number of Reavers, it suggests that Reaver Prime has not successfully recruited yet.
I still find the other hypothesis more compelling, but your interpretation makes sense in that the GM would be willing to reveal a reaver when there’s a replacement. She never mentioned level 3 though (and by revealing a reaver, I doubt there is one) which makes your interpretation less compelling.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
In any case, I’m disappointed there’s nobody participating in the reaver hunt while I sleep. There are too many hypotheses to test without experimenting.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
This is the post I think indicates which hypothesis about the rules is more likely. But again, it’s yet another thing we’re assuming. Reposting everything from the first warning would be a good way to test.Kitsune wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:45 pmGM Clarification:dargorygel wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:42 pmWhy would GM let us know of three reavers? Wouldn't we just be told when they actually start killing by telling us of a death?
This was a Level 1 Reaver Press Rules Violation.
This is to indicate that a violation has occurred in the existing pattern, but not who is responsible for it.
A Level 2 Rules Violation, if incurred, will reveal a player as a Reaver.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Oh, I never reposted did I
what were the timestamps again, lemme do it now
misthought I didn't post in between lol
what were the timestamps again, lemme do it now
misthought I didn't post in between lol
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
By the way, should we be forming a 2 person wagon again to test that our faithful leader of a captain is still as trustworthy as ever?
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
I’m on phone at work. But was roughly page 27 to 32.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
@xorxes - please see what Bunny posted. He said what I did, just more eloquently. You can't have two level 1 violations with the same person. Their second mistake would be a level 2.
I also highly, highly suspect we're looking at some sort of 24 hr posting requirement. Not things that they cannot say.
I also highly, highly suspect we're looking at some sort of 24 hr posting requirement. Not things that they cannot say.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
You’re suggesting my entire experiment of reposting is doomed to come up with a negative result because it isn’t a forbidden post it’s a required post?goldfinger0303 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 1:42 pm@xorxes - please see what Bunny posted. He said what I did, just more eloquently. You can't have two level 1 violations with the same person. Their second mistake would be a level 2.
I also highly, highly suspect we're looking at some sort of 24 hr posting requirement. Not things that they cannot say.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Alright. I believe I only had one post (which will be following) in the first time segment, and none in the next
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
dw goldie I'll make the elaboration walls once the new year burning is over (skimming on phone atm)goldfinger0303 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 11:13 pm@rdrivera - I'm aware the phases are 48 hours long. Hence why its better to put pressure on the people that are here now, not the ones that will show up a few hours before phase end. We won't get any information from leaving our votes parked on them.
And again, we really need more people to speak up on the massclaim. Anything less than 10 PR claims is going to be next to worthless for us, yet invaluable for the scum. Getting a dozen people to claim PR or not PR helps scum because they can hide amongst the PR claims and not get caught. This is an everything or nothing push.
So I'm going to be scrutinizing the people who are currently pushing the mass claim who are *not* xorxes. I still do believe xorxes is town, and have good town reads on teacon and ND as well. emc is looking very suspect though. He has posted the third most out of anyone, but I just looked through each of those posts and the vast, vast majority of them are garbage. He has maybe 3 posts where he's actually considering something seriously, and just plugged a vote onto the silent Vecna. Moreover, he went from being skeptical about the massclaim to a full-blown supporter of it, and started organizing the chart to push people into thinking this was an already agreed-upon thing that we are doing.
And then there's this.
I don't like it. ##VOTE EMC
but my general posts are shit until you get a concussion. then I look like god shitting purple mayonnaise, I tell ya
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: brainbomb, ButterscotchReader, Hominidae, Jamiet99uk, JustAGuyNamedWill, Spartaculous