MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Hi Flav! I see you watching. We'll get them! We'll make those gorram Alliance pay!
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
By my check - Rivera, Tom, and worcej all have only made one post with an '@' in it, and all shortly before/around the press violation - so these three would be the ones I'd really like to see it from.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:21 amOK! I have a hypothesis about the reavers with a confirmed hit on a candidate. Could everyone who has claimed PR please post an @ symbol?
Thank you!
And yes...maybe you'll find my reaver candidate too...he's posted it just once, shortly before the announcement, and by accident as it was in a quote.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Yes, worcej's and Tom's were prior to Kitsune's previous post. But all 3 had them quoted.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:28 amBy my check - Rivera, Tom, and worcej all have only made one post with an '@' in it, and all shortly before/around the press violation - so these three would be the ones I'd really like to see it from.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:21 amOK! I have a hypothesis about the reavers with a confirmed hit on a candidate. Could everyone who has claimed PR please post an @ symbol?
Thank you!
And yes...maybe you'll find my reaver candidate too...he's posted it just once, shortly before the announcement, and by accident as it was in a quote.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
I'm not sure (besides ND) I could be accused of bullying? ND and I always butt heads, but the rest mainly is frustration that everyone doesn't see how obvious the path to victory here is. I hate to sheep, but xorxes nailed it early on, and when i came around to see his logic, I'm onboard.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:24 amMostly the brash bullying rather than thinking and consideration I expect from people looking for scum. That requires doubt. You haven't shown any. You've been gung ho; you've sheeped xorxes; you've proclaimed things rather than advocated. All in all, it's a sign of somebody both agitated, and seems to not want to seem like they know something, but do.
I don't know exactly who the scum are yet, but I believe we're pretty much mathematically destined to figure this one out.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
I think it's a reasonable thing to ask and there's no reason town or scum wouldn't participate. Good catch either way.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:30 amYes, worcej's and Tom's were prior to Kitsune's previous post. But all 3 had them quoted.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:28 amBy my check - Rivera, Tom, and worcej all have only made one post with an '@' in it, and all shortly before/around the press violation - so these three would be the ones I'd really like to see it from.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:21 amOK! I have a hypothesis about the reavers with a confirmed hit on a candidate. Could everyone who has claimed PR please post an @ symbol?
Thank you!
And yes...maybe you'll find my reaver candidate too...he's posted it just once, shortly before the announcement, and by accident as it was in a quote.
Reaver violations will hopefully be easier to find following a few flips and a few more if they happen... at the very least, we KNOW someone violated it before KIt's announcement :)
##CallGM - does each individual reaver have their own rules to follow? Are they the same throughout the game? Do they change following a violation?
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
It is not going to be that easy because of the Reavers.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:31 amI'm not sure (besides ND) I could be accused of bullying? ND and I always butt heads, but the rest mainly is frustration that everyone doesn't see how obvious the path to victory here is. I hate to sheep, but xorxes nailed it early on, and when i came around to see his logic, I'm onboard.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:24 amMostly the brash bullying rather than thinking and consideration I expect from people looking for scum. That requires doubt. You haven't shown any. You've been gung ho; you've sheeped xorxes; you've proclaimed things rather than advocated. All in all, it's a sign of somebody both agitated, and seems to not want to seem like they know something, but do.
I don't know exactly who the scum are yet, but I believe we're pretty much mathematically destined to figure this one out.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
I'm sorry your small, bad toupee'd-yellow-haired brain can only use such small and crude words, ND. Hopefully 2020 will see you experience a lot of personal growth... especially in the hands.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Which is why I think it is very important we develop as many reasonable hypotheses as possible as fast as possible.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 amIt is not going to be that easy because of the Reavers.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:31 amI'm not sure (besides ND) I could be accused of bullying? ND and I always butt heads, but the rest mainly is frustration that everyone doesn't see how obvious the path to victory here is. I hate to sheep, but xorxes nailed it early on, and when i came around to see his logic, I'm onboard.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:24 am
Mostly the brash bullying rather than thinking and consideration I expect from people looking for scum. That requires doubt. You haven't shown any. You've been gung ho; you've sheeped xorxes; you've proclaimed things rather than advocated. All in all, it's a sign of somebody both agitated, and seems to not want to seem like they know something, but do.
I don't know exactly who the scum are yet, but I believe we're pretty much mathematically destined to figure this one out.
Go search the thread...we have a reaver to nab.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
A full massclaim Day 1 would have been a bit better against the Reavers, but hopefully Day 2 we can sort it out. It may make sense (and be sensible) for town PR claimants to state their PR just before EoN, that way they are on record before any possible Reaver-ing has changed their win condition.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 amIt is not going to be that easy because of the Reavers.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:31 amI'm not sure (besides ND) I could be accused of bullying? ND and I always butt heads, but the rest mainly is frustration that everyone doesn't see how obvious the path to victory here is. I hate to sheep, but xorxes nailed it early on, and when i came around to see his logic, I'm onboard.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:24 am
Mostly the brash bullying rather than thinking and consideration I expect from people looking for scum. That requires doubt. You haven't shown any. You've been gung ho; you've sheeped xorxes; you've proclaimed things rather than advocated. All in all, it's a sign of somebody both agitated, and seems to not want to seem like they know something, but do.
I don't know exactly who the scum are yet, but I believe we're pretty much mathematically destined to figure this one out.
We should also make sure we have them claim in an order-verifiable way. I.E. have the roles/players claim in an optimal order to minimize fake-claim opportunities. Probably by having players claim in a pre-defined order set by xorxes (but only after it's been confirmed he has not been Reave'd).
Additionally, roleblock claims will need to come into mind. End of the day, we should still continue to lynch among the non-PR, since there's almost certainly scum in there, unless peter, Vecna/Fox, and Superstition all claim PR (though peter seems ot not want to claim at all...)
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
It seems most likely the violation happened between pages 27 and 32, as Kitsune had a GM post on page 27.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:34 amWhich is why I think it is very important we develop as many reasonable hypotheses as possible as fast as possible.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 amIt is not going to be that easy because of the Reavers.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:31 am
I'm not sure (besides ND) I could be accused of bullying? ND and I always butt heads, but the rest mainly is frustration that everyone doesn't see how obvious the path to victory here is. I hate to sheep, but xorxes nailed it early on, and when i came around to see his logic, I'm onboard.
I don't know exactly who the scum are yet, but I believe we're pretty much mathematically destined to figure this one out.
Go search the thread...we have a reaver to nab.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
exactly. Maybe not, but if the @ hypothesis is correct, then it is in that range that rdrivera quoted one. Hence "level one" (posted by quoting) as opposed to level 2 (posting it yourself)Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 amIt seems most likely the violation happened between pages 27 and 32, as Kitsune had a GM post on page 27.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:34 amWhich is why I think it is very important we develop as many reasonable hypotheses as possible as fast as possible.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 am
It is not going to be that easy because of the Reavers.
Go search the thread...we have a reaver to nab.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
The reaver communication restrictions have been pre-set before the game and are intended to be consistent regardless of which reavers are Randed or Recruited into the faction. They do not change due to a violation.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Specifically between posts 539 and 636. Non-xorx players posting in this interval:
- goldfinger0303
- rdrivera2005
- dargorygel
- Tom Bombadil
- Chaqa
- ND
- teacon7
- worcej
- Temasek22
- e.m.c^42
- BunnyGo
- bozotheclown
- KalelChase
- BunnyGo
- peterlund
It's almost everyone, of course, but it's a starting point. Peter's post was just seconds before Kit's, so I think he's very unlikely to be the Reaver Prime. Still leaves a lot. I'm going to try to go through and ISO at least a few of these to see what looked odd when comparing them to previous posts of theirs.
- goldfinger0303
- rdrivera2005
- dargorygel
- Tom Bombadil
- Chaqa
- ND
- teacon7
- worcej
- Temasek22
- e.m.c^42
- BunnyGo
- bozotheclown
- KalelChase
- BunnyGo
- peterlund
It's almost everyone, of course, but it's a starting point. Peter's post was just seconds before Kit's, so I think he's very unlikely to be the Reaver Prime. Still leaves a lot. I'm going to try to go through and ISO at least a few of these to see what looked odd when comparing them to previous posts of theirs.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:45 amexactly. Maybe not, but if the @ hypothesis is correct, then it is in that range that rdrivera quoted one. Hence "level one" (posted by quoting) as opposed to level 2 (posting it yourself)
##FollowupCall: Are the different levels of violation in reference to which instance of infraction it is, or are there multiple different levels of possible violations? i.e.:
could a level 1 be a small error, and a level 2 a large one?
or
is level 1 - first time
level 2 - second time
etc.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
This information about the Reaver Communication Restrictions is part of the closed area of this semi-open setup.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:49 am##FollowupCall: Are the different levels of violation in reference to which instance of infraction it is, or are there multiple different levels of possible violations? i.e.:
could a level 1 be a small error, and a level 2 a large one?
or
is level 1 - first time
level 2 - second time
etc.
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
Lol you got a real thing for me and trump. This isnt the politics forum and I haven't brought him up once. I know you hate the guy. I know that's the popular bandwagon thing to do. But this is a game of mafia not a place for you to spew your hatred of the president. Go start a thread on the politics forum for that. All your doing is distracting from real conversation here with your ignorance.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
My picks:bozotheclown wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:06 am
Scum survey (pick 4):
Chaqa
emc
bozo
Temasek
ND
peterlund
Superstition
Foxcastle
bozo: ND, peterlund, Superstition, Foxcastle
goldfinger: peterlund, Superstition, emc, bozo
ND: Superstition, Chaqa, ?, ?
Temasek: emc, peterlund, Superstition, Foxcastle
EMC
Bozo
Superstition
Foxcastle
But Foxcastle is mostly in there due to lack of any reason to clear him, owing to lack of data.
I townread Chaqa and townlean Peterlund.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
@BunnyGo: I am h@ppy to confirm my @bility to use the @ symbol.
Other symbols on my keyboard include ' # ~ / ? \ | + = - _ ` ¬ ¦ ! " £ $ % ^ & * ( and ).
Other symbols on my keyboard include ' # ~ / ? \ | + = - _ ` ¬ ¦ ! " £ $ % ^ & * ( and ).
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]
This is a worthwhile question.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 4:08 amI am sure this has been asked, would we have found out if Flavius was a backup?
##CALL GM - if Flavius was a backup, would this have been declared when he flipped VT?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot]