MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14306
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#421 Post by Chaqa » Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:59 pm

lol my typo is hilarious. Oops.

I like Dargo’s idea. +town

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#422 Post by xorxes » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:00 pm

teacon7 wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:22 pm

I guess I'm supportive of a mass claim when the captain gets GM verified... that'll do a lot for comfort level in confirming to me that the idea comes from a town source.
As long as I'm not counterclaimed, I should be your top townread at the moment, even if not a clear, unless you can come up with a sensible explanation for why I would pull this stunt as scum of any kind, and why nobody would counterclaim me. So all the shade you're throwing my way when I should be your top townread only makes you look scummy. Surely there's other people you can investigate more fruitfully instead?

@xorx This was your idea. Weigh in: Doc and Reader seem really important. What if they didn't participate in the claim, and only claimed if they were in danger of getting shot/lynched?
They can just claim undifferentiated PR as dargo suggested. Plenty of room to hide in there.

If Doc doesn't claim PR for example, they risk the Reader wasting their read on them. Or the companion roleblocking them, wasting both their powers.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#423 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:02 pm

Still waitin', Xorx.

e.m.c^42
Posts: 6320
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:00 pm
Location: Rated 0/5 Stars; ☆☆☆☆☆
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#424 Post by e.m.c^42 » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:02 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:34 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:32 pm
BRB, gonna go get some Chipotle and then type up a very long and detailed post about why we should assclaim
"Assclaim"?

Sounds kinky bro.
It's Chaqa n Chipotle, whaddya expect?
-------------

That creamy, satiny smooth avacado, spread all over the luscious, juicy meat wrapped in a tortilla, spurting as you bite -

Chaqa moaned, and suddenly woke up with hunger in his torso. Of all the things he could've dreamed about, oh god why.

But Chipotle.

He knew he had a character trait that made him partial to such foodstuffs, a particular weakness for this franchise - but he's never thought about it in that way before.

Distinctly uncomfortable, and rather tense, he rouses himself up from bed to splash water on his face. His breath unevenly fogs the mirror, face flushed and paling, mottled cheeks. Unbidden, the sensation of flared nose and lips while biting around - fuck he doesn't want to think about this.

Desperately, Chaqa throws himself at his laptop for a distraction. Flying through tabs, wikipedia-wikipedia-work-porn shit that doesn't help at all gmail-chipotle coupon fuck that's even worse webdiplomacy.net.

Ah. Webdip, and all the forum mafia that comes with it. The ultimate time procrastinating, consuming, and otherwise distracting place to be. With a sigh of relief, he navigates over to the thread and starts scrolling though the posts.

Mind abuzz with all the conspiracies natural, he starts tapping out vaguely crafted texts. After all, no point in revealing his hand of tinfoils early.

But unfortunately for Chaqa, he ends up reading this tripe hacked up by EMC and ends up hungrier than before. lol

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14306
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#425 Post by Chaqa » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:02 pm

Xorxes, I think your logic is flawed as we’ve had bolt PR claims before like me as Jekyll last game that weren’t true. I don’t doubt you, but your benefit to confirming your claim is astronomical here.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14306
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#426 Post by Chaqa » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:05 pm

Oh god EMC why

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#427 Post by xorxes » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:06 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:17 pm
CLAIMS SO FAR:

Xorxes: Captain
Chaqa: VT


@Xorxes: Asking again - why do you think I am a VT? Seems a weird thing to assert before I've claimed. Demanding a massclaim and speculating what specific people are going to claim feels rather.... off.
I assumed you were VT because: you asked Chaqa what his role was after I claimed, thus you were seemingly in favor of the massclaim. You did not claim anything yourself, which suggested you had nothing to claim.

I no longer think you're VT though, or you wouldn't be making such a big deal of my simple question. So my guess right now is PR or scum.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#428 Post by worcej » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:07 pm

goldfinger0303 wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 3:38 pm
Xorxes, I thought about your advice on the drive in to work, and I still don't see the benefit, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just a bit Rusty and it'll come to me. But the only benefits I see don't jive with your massclaim push.

Other than that, I'd really like to hear more points of view in support of the massclaim. You're pushing it so hard and so frequently that we risk making this an echo chamber and drowning out other people. There's still people lurking hard. There's people who have just dropped in for one or two poorly written comments that show that they haven't really been reading the thread. And because the conversation is fixed on this, they're not getting pressure.
I think the gains of a mass-claim come at a cost, that has been illustrated numerous times via posting. I think your analysis was the best so far in terms of applying math (I didn't check it), but I think some people (xorxes) puts more value in any information gained than the potential costs of it.

I think the MC will throw scum teams and BH into a potential panic/misplay early by doing it now. Earlier in the phase, I thought saving a day (do it on D2) to do it would minimize the benefit to RP, but it also comes at a cost of potentially losing a good PR early.

I guess it comes down to what are you more concerned with - M1 or M2 (RP)? I honestly think M2 is the stronger group of the two, but starts out the weakest. I think our plans we make should be focused on reducing the potential of M2.

That being said: A clear downside to the MC is you will eliminate the potential of M1 accidently NK'ing M2 on N1.

Also agree a lot with the lack of participation from some people. We just passed a 'Vecna posting period' with no comments yet (unless I am not caught up yet to that point still). Also, nothing from Tom yet?

##vote Vecna - COME BACK TO ME MIGHTY CAESAR!

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#429 Post by worcej » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:09 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:25 pm
I hardclaim that I am not the Captain.
So much value with this one Jamie lol...

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#430 Post by xorxes » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:09 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:02 pm
Xorxes, I think your logic is flawed as we’ve had bolt PR claims before like me as Jekyll last game that weren’t true. I don’t doubt you, but your benefit to confirming your claim is astronomical here.
I'm obviously going to confirm my claim, but when I think it's best. People's reactions to someone not fully clear are much more interesting than people's reactions to a mechanical clear. Nobody will interact with me once I'm mechanically clear, it's more boring.

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#431 Post by BunnyGo » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:10 pm

e.m.c^42 wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:22 pm
##vote vecna, darlin' of my heart

y'all can take your park your policy votes somewhere else now ;p
##VOTE worcej. I don’t understand why Drunk Bunny (TM) didn’t like him last night. But I trust Drunk Bunny’s instincts. Also am parking my policy vote elsewhere.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#432 Post by worcej » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:12 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:17 pm
Maybe I will just post like this all of the time since people seem to be ignoring most of my posts so far.
Please don't.

teacon7
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:48 pm
Location: Midwestern USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#433 Post by teacon7 » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:14 pm

peterlund wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:31 pm
Bozo post seems to be something in lojban a constructed language. I was not able to find a translator.

https://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=Lojban&setlang=en
Bozo said:
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:52 am
xu ro'oi sampu numtca nakni
I found a dictionary. http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/

Here's the results.

xu = Definition: discursive: true-false question.

ro'oi = Definition: universal plural quantifier. ``All.''

sampu = Definition: x1 is simple/unmixed/uncomplicated in property x2 (ka).

numtca = Definition: $x1=n1=t1$ is a village/[rural town] of area $x2=n2=t2$, in
political unit $x3=t3$, serving hinterland/region $x4=t4$

nakni = Definition: x1 is a male/buck of species x2 evidencing masculine
physical/biological/genetic trait(s) x3 (ka); x1 is masculine.
Notes: See also fetsi, bersa. For culturally male traits, see
jikynakni.


I have no idea what the grammar of this language is. I'd have said "it's still random" except for the word "town" or "village" in there. Do a little bit of terrible sentence construction and you get bozo asking:

"Are all you guys town?"

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#434 Post by worcej » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:16 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:49 pm
worcej wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:47 pm
xorxes wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 11:05 am
Why do people keep perpetuating this silly notion that massclaims "ruin" a game? If the massclaim solves a game completely, then the game was broken to begin with, it started broken, it can't be ruined. Otherwise, a massclaim is just one more tool to help us solve the game, just like copscans, docsaves, GM reveals, etc.

We're not guaranteed to win with a massclaim, so the game is not broken. The only question here is whether a massclaim is beneficial to town or not at this stage, and my impression is that it is, so I will start it when I finish catching up, unless I read something in the meanwhile that makes me change my mind.
Highlighting that one sentence because we need to be better about ensuring these type of situations won't happen. As a community, we focus a lot more on mechanics than actually hunting and this won't be fixed until the mechanics elements of discussion during the game is eliminated
Not to go off on a game design tangent, but how is that possible, beyond always having closed setups?
You'll see in my next game.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14306
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#435 Post by Chaqa » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:20 pm

Massclaim is not typically an issue on Day 1 unless a game is Role Madness or extremely PR heavy. In the past (pre-M30 or so) we rarely had setups with more than 3 or 4 PRs, so it wasn't an issue.

The Role Madness game we had the Assassin as a counter to massclaim. In the next game I run, there won't be enough for it to matter.

It comes down to the number of PRs relative to the overall # of players.

Unrelated-

My massclaim analysis was going to be about how we could confirm everyone's claims and such once it was done. If we are doing just PR vs VT claims it doesn't make sense yet, so I'm not gonna do it.

@xorx - I think now (a few hours before the 24 hour mark) is a good time to confirm yourself.

I also think once we have a reasonable number of claims, the vigilante should shoot someone who has claimed VT (and yes, I'm aware this includes me, but a VT's job is to be cannon fodder).

teacon7
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:48 pm
Location: Midwestern USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#436 Post by teacon7 » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:22 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:33 pm
Well, okay two things:

- Do you agree that Chaqa's responses to Xorxes' call for a massclaim were very hedgy?

- Do you think it's weird that Xorxes called on me to claim, and then asked me explicitly if I was going to claim VT? If he wants a real massclaim, what is he doing trying to call out in advance what he thinks people will claim?

- Do you think Peterlund has genuinely dumbslipped about the Reaver QT or lack thereof?
1) I thought he was hedgy. I'm a bit more sympathetic now that I've tried to wrestle with the idea myself. Given what xorx is talking about, I'm inclined to think chaqa's response is NAI due to the nature of the idea. Is the massclaim a good idea or not? I'd almost be suspicious if someone had strong opinions right away without engaging the idea.

2) idk why xorx asked if you were going to claim vt. maybe he scumread you and thought you were therefore going to claim vt. is he calling out "what people will claim" as a general rule, or specific to jamiet?

3) I don't think peter is dumb. Nor do I think he's the reaver. if anything, he missed when I asked about a reaver QT in the signup thread.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#437 Post by xorxes » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:23 pm

peterlund wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:27 pm
xorxes wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 2:40 pm
- It reduces considerably the lynchpool for us to find scum.
- It eliminates the possibility that our PRs waste their powers or even harm the town with them.
Miscalculation, since I and probably some more people will not take part the mass-claim so the lynch pool will be considerably larger than 10 even if we believe all claimants claims...
Your non-participation is irrelevant to the massclaim's numbers unless you're a PR, so I take this as you implying you're a PR.

I would not recommend that the Vig shoots you today. However, if you do end up claiming VT at some point, you should be lynched immediately.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#438 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:25 pm

xorxes wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:06 pm

I assumed you were VT because: you asked Chaqa what his role was after I claimed, thus you were seemingly in favor of the massclaim. You did not claim anything yourself, which suggested you had nothing to claim.
Ah, I see.

I called on Chaqa to claim because he had been the other person advocating (in his own hedgy way) for a massclaim. So I wanted him to put his money where his mouth was, so to speak. I was waiting to see if he suddenly used his hedging to fall back and refuse to claim.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14306
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#439 Post by Chaqa » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:25 pm

Let's be real, the vig should just shoot Vecna before he gets to say anything so he gets frustrated ;)

(this is a bad idea, please do not do this)

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#440 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:27 pm

@Xorxes: Now you have hardclaimed the Captain, and only Chaqa has followed you in massclaiming.

What do you think of this development?

Did you claim too early? Why did you not wait for more support?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat