Why?
M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
I just realized I'm watching Hell's Kitchen and I'm literally turning British
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
The only way to fake friendly neighbour is to implicate two scum in the process. Once one of them is caught, so is the other. Inno child was unclaimable. Anti-encryptor would probably be one of the first lynch coices, and if someone refused to claim on the grounds that they were the lover, they would also be lynched, so I don't see how you all were comfortable with that. Who would have confirmed the FN?TrPrado wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:30 pmOh, didn't realize they weren't posted. We had anti-encryptor (non-confirmable), friendly neighbor (fakeable), lover (confirming would be against town win condition), and innocent child.
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
If the scum claims a verifiable role, we would make them confirm it. If the scum claims a non-verifiable role, we would not necessarily avoid lynching them. It is the same thing that would happen at EOD, but it gives us more time to react.worcej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:32 pmI think the only benefit with this claiming plan is to catch a 3P. Scum can hide (until if/when their fake role can be claimed) if they are leading and thus we move to a mislynch.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:26 pmWhat do you think of trying some variant of Kalel's idea? I suggest we agree that the vote leader after 24 hours should claim his role or get lynched for refusing to do so.
I think it risks exposure for a non-game advancing catch.
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
Because I want to pressurise him because of his 'that's my two' post [paraphrasing]
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
Far, but that requires a 3P to be in the crosshairs, which is unlikely.Kitsune wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:37 pmIt's not as good as lynching mafia-scum, but I don't see a downside on lynching 3P and keeping town alive.worcej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:32 pmI think the only benefit with this claiming plan is to catch a 3P. Scum can hide (until if/when their fake role can be claimed) if they are leading and thus we move to a mislynch.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:26 pmWhat do you think of trying some variant of Kalel's idea? I suggest we agree that the vote leader after 24 hours should claim his role or get lynched for refusing to do so.
I think it risks exposure for a non-game advancing catch.
Lynching NK Tanner is neutral. Lynching Arsonist before they can douse half the town in petrol is a remarkably good idea. Ditto the infector, although infection is less immediately lethal.
The most likely outcome is you'll just expose a town player to the scum team to narrow down the pool of candidates for the 'important' roles, thus making their job easier.
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
There is a lot of shit that can happen on D1 without any claims being issued. Why not start there instead of pushing for claims?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:41 pmIf the scum claims a verifiable role, we would make them confirm it. If the scum claims a non-verifiable role, we would not necessarily avoid lynching them. It is the same thing that would happen at EOD, but it gives us more time to react.worcej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:32 pmI think the only benefit with this claiming plan is to catch a 3P. Scum can hide (until if/when their fake role can be claimed) if they are leading and thus we move to a mislynch.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:26 pmWhat do you think of trying some variant of Kalel's idea? I suggest we agree that the vote leader after 24 hours should claim his role or get lynched for refusing to do so.
I think it risks exposure for a non-game advancing catch.
IMO, the mass claim helps the scum the most, then town, followed by 3P players.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 4:00 am
- Contact:
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
Damo, just on attitude? Not that I'm completely against that, but what else you got?
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
I am suggesting we accelerate the day, if we don't, the town player would still have to claim his role at EOD, giving that information to the mafia, and most likely another town player would get lynched.worcej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:41 pmFar, but that requires a 3P to be in the crosshairs, which is unlikely.Kitsune wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:37 pmIt's not as good as lynching mafia-scum, but I don't see a downside on lynching 3P and keeping town alive.
Lynching NK Tanner is neutral. Lynching Arsonist before they can douse half the town in petrol is a remarkably good idea. Ditto the infector, although infection is less immediately lethal.
The most likely outcome is you'll just expose a town player to the scum team to narrow down the pool of candidates for the 'important' roles, thus making their job easier.
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
Mass claiming is being discussed, Kalel suggested another idea, and I suggested a modification of Kalel' s idea. Instead of participating in any of these discussions, you implied that you were not going to contribute to day 1.
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
How would you accelerate the day? Hammer it?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:46 pmI am suggesting we accelerate the day, if we don't, the town player would still have to claim his role at EOD, giving that information to the mafia, and most likely another town player would get lynched.
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
Now just work on the word count/post and we'll be getting to some awesome participation!
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
No, I reaction tested and damo waltzed right in.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:49 pmMass claiming is being discussed, Kalel suggested another idea, and I suggested a modification of Kalel' s idea. Instead of participating in any of these discussions, you implied that you were not going to contribute to day 1.
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
To your point, though, I have no interest in a massclaim discussion. You can find a quote from past games if you want to know why it's a stupid idea that I will never participate in on day 1.bo_sox48 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:51 pmNo, I reaction tested and damo waltzed right in.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:49 pmMass claiming is being discussed, Kalel suggested another idea, and I suggested a modification of Kalel' s idea. Instead of participating in any of these discussions, you implied that you were not going to contribute to day 1.
Re: M50 Apocalypse Meme Redux
To be even more vague, I don't really care about the mechanics of this game at all. Thinking in mathematical and strictly logical terms is not the best way for me to gather reads and draw conclusions. If it's best for you, wonderful. Have at it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Ernst_Brenner, Google [Bot], Spartaculous