M50: Madness in Memetown [HIDDEN]

[xorxes]

D1 mass claim: yes or no? Discuss.

[Jamiet99uk]

"I haven't read my role PM"

"That's nothing bro, I haven't looked at the setup"

"You think you're ignorant? Ha! I can't actually read or write"

"That's nothing, I'm not even toilet trained!"


Can we please get away from this D1 competition to be the most stupid and disengaged player whilst simultaneously being present and polluting the thread?

Jesus, it's fucking tiresome.

[Jamiet99uk]

D1 mass claim: yes or no? Discuss.

A mass claim in a semi-open setup?

Hmm.

I'm not a big fan of massclaims in general, to be
honest.

[xorxes]

D1 mass claim: yes or no? Discuss.

A mass claim in a semi-open setup?

Hmm.

I'm not a big fan of massclaims in general, to be
honest.

A lot (most? all? I haven't tallied) of the town roles can prove themselves.

[Jamiet99uk]

D1 mass claim: yes or no? Discuss.

A mass claim in a semi-open setup?

Hmm.

I'm not a big fan of massclaims in general, to be
honest.

A lot (most? all? I haven't tallied) of the town roles can prove themselves.

You seem to think a massclaim would be good.

Tell us why you think so?

[xorxes]

A mass claim in a semi-open setup?

Hmm.

I'm not a big fan of massclaims in general, to be
honest.

A lot (most? all? I haven't tallied) of the town roles can prove themselves.

You seem to think a massclaim would be good.

Tell us why you think so?

I just did in the post you're responding to.

[Jamiet99uk]

A lot (most? all? I haven't tallied) of the town roles can prove themselves.

You seem to think a massclaim would be good.

Tell us why you think so?

I just did in the post you're responding to.

No, articulate your theory in full.

[Jamiet99uk]

It seems Xorxes is insinuating that the setup is easily breakable by a massclaim. It would be a shame if that were the case. Aren't the Council supposed to check for such weaknesses?

[xorxes]

It seems Xorxes is insinuating that the setup is easily breakable by a massclaim. It would be a shame if that were the case. Aren't the Council supposed to check for such weaknesses?

You seem nervous at the idea of a massclaim.

[Jamiet99uk]

It seems Xorxes is insinuating that the setup is easily breakable by a massclaim. It would be a shame if that were the case. Aren't the Council supposed to check for such weaknesses?

You seem nervous at the idea of a massclaim.

I think it's a bad idea.

[Vaporwave]

Game has just started and not many people have arrived, why are you in such a rush, Jamie ? Let people pull down their pants before peeing, let them enter the building at least

oof

[xorxes]

It seems Xorxes is insinuating that the setup is easily breakable by a massclaim. It would be a shame if that were the case. Aren't the Council supposed to check for such weaknesses?

You seem nervous at the idea of a massclaim.

I think it's a bad idea.

Yes, you already said that, but you also seem nervous about it.

[Vaporwave]

I did not see any provision in the rules stating I have to read my role pm.

So im not gonna do that

Look at this, Vecna not touching his pm and me being late with setup familiarity. Somebody please connect the dots!

I've done my homework, so Vecna I hope you've also done yours

[Jamiet99uk]

You seem nervous at the idea of a massclaim.

I think it's a bad idea.

Yes, you already said that, but you also seem nervous about it.

You seem excited about it.

[xorxes]

##CALL GM:

Guaranteed one of: {Gunsmith, Cop}
Guaranteed one of: {Doctor, Bodyguard}
Guaranteed one of: {Item Smith, JOAT}
Guaranteed one of: {Vigilante, Gladiator, Vengeful}

Does this mean "exactly one of" or "at least one of"?

[Jamiet99uk]

^ That is a worthwhile question.

[xorxes]

I think it's a bad idea.

Yes, you already said that, but you also seem nervous about it.

You seem excited about it.

I don't know if I'd go as far as excited, but I am at least interested, yes. Would you say that's alignment indicative?

[Jamiet99uk]

I'm not sure, Xorxes.

[Chaqa]

##CALL GM:

Guaranteed one of: {Gunsmith, Cop}
Guaranteed one of: {Doctor, Bodyguard}
Guaranteed one of: {Item Smith, JOAT}
Guaranteed one of: {Vigilante, Gladiator, Vengeful}

Does this mean "exactly one of" or "at least one of"?

##GM Note

At least one of.

Also - this was something I forgot to put in the initial post as I copied it from last game, but the mafia were provided a list of fake claim roles similar to other role madness games. Sorry, we had a bit of an incident and had to rewrite our game start post because I forgot to save it and left this out :p

[FlaviusAetius]

Where's Flav? I want to go all Squigs Dude on him

right here <3