MAFIA 49 -Avengers "Re-release"- GAME THREAD [HIDDEN]

[BunnyGo]

My apologies for the assumption. My 'calculator' called you out, and you've been acting a bit erratic lately (which I consider a new trait for you). So you're not as town in my gut as I previously thought... Regardless I'm reading through and will likely reassess.

Tell me more of this calculator!

Fox,

Just a spreadsheet with multiple tabs. One is showing me the Signal to Noise - Number of analysis posts vs. number of posts. Another is a list of +1/0/-1 incidents... I.e. +1 for challenging lazy assertions, -1 for calling out PR, etc. I am giving

Essentially what you've seen in my two ISO posts. #3417 (where you looked good) and #3737 right above this exchange.

+a bunch of town points for keeping a spreadsheet and investigating.

[KalelChase]

@Kalel

I truly do understand the bias of people who work in business (I've worked there too). They don't understand art, or genius. There's a reason my peers and I command half a million a year when hedge funds come calling to hire us for short periods of time. We're that good. To give a comparison: about 1000 people will apply to 1 job in academia. About 250 of those people are "good", and work their fucking asses off like you wouldn't believe to be that good.

Bunny, me and my peers command a half a million a year just a short time after failing out of college. I appreciate the answer but I was puffing up to you... I don't have an academic bias. I come from a long line of teachers and principals and think most of you should be paid more. After a few short days of posting back and forth I have no doubts that you are "good" and that you earned it.

And you're good at distracting me and adding more noise to the thread.

[KalelChase]

Tell me more of this calculator!

Fox,

Just a spreadsheet with multiple tabs. One is showing me the Signal to Noise - Number of analysis posts vs. number of posts. Another is a list of +1/0/-1 incidents... I.e. +1 for challenging lazy assertions, -1 for calling out PR, etc. I am giving

Essentially what you've seen in my two ISO posts. #3417 (where you looked good) and #3737 right above this exchange.

+a bunch of town points for keeping a spreadsheet and investigating.

Yeah, just wish I had known enough to start it on day one.

[BunnyGo]

Well Kalel...how about we sound each other out. Pick a third target and try a public litigation? One of us defense and one prosecution?

I don't even care who it is or which side I take.

[Foxcastle]

Well Kalel...how about we sound each other out. Pick a third target and try a public litigation? One of us defense and one prosecution?

I don't even care who it is or which side I take.

You should have a third party pick so there's less likelihood of scum-on-scum kangaroo kourt...

[BunnyGo]

Well Kalel...how about we sound each other out. Pick a third target and try a public litigation? One of us defense and one prosecution?

I don't even care who it is or which side I take.

You should have a third party pick so there's less likelihood of scum-on-scum kangaroo kourt...

Fine with me...you nominating the defendant, and appointing solicitors?

[Foxcastle]

Well Kalel...how about we sound each other out. Pick a third target and try a public litigation? One of us defense and one prosecution?

I don't even care who it is or which side I take.

You should have a third party pick so there's less likelihood of scum-on-scum kangaroo kourt...

Fine with me...you nominating the defendant, and appointing solicitors?

Probably don't want my suggestion: Sulit would make short trial.

[KalelChase]

Fox,

Just a spreadsheet with multiple tabs. One is showing me the Signal to Noise - Number of analysis posts vs. number of posts. Another is a list of +1/0/-1 incidents... I.e. +1 for challenging lazy assertions, -1 for calling out PR, etc. I am giving

Essentially what you've seen in my two ISO posts. #3417 (where you looked good) and #3737 right above this exchange.

+a bunch of town points for keeping a spreadsheet and investigating.

Yeah, just wish I had known enough to start it on day one.

I'm good at the objective analytics, I'm even plugging in variables that will change all the weights as roles are revealed. What I'm bad at is the subjective, what is a +1 and what is a -1. Do I retroactively ding someone for a well reasoned and sourced vote, even if it turns out to be town? Do I take into consideration peoples scum list (and how often would I update that)? If my measurements trend correctly I should be able to filter out anomalies of any scum who is not pretending 'all the time' and provide a % chance for scumlean.

Likely I'm just confusing myself, but it sure is a way to learn the game.

And now I'm over-posting noise.... damn you Bunny!

[KalelChase]

You should have a third party pick so there's less likelihood of scum-on-scum kangaroo kourt...

Fine with me...you nominating the defendant, and appointing solicitors?

Probably don't want my suggestion: Sulit would make short trial.

Sulit it is... Who's defending and who's prosecuting?

[BunnyGo]

Fine with me...you nominating the defendant, and appointing solicitors?

Probably don't want my suggestion: Sulit would make short trial.

Sulit it is... Who's defending and who's prosecuting?

Don't care

[damo666]

Bunny defends

[Chaqa]

Maybe this is scum theater putting on a show, I'm not sure, but this is entertaining.

[BunnyGo]

Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I come here today to show to you not only that Sulit is a townie. We must remember in all this:

1) ND gave us clues as to Sulit's alignment
2) Absence and lack of posting does not alone indicate scum (see: Yuuki)
3) Sulit's comments have been on point when they have come.

I'll present this to you with clear sources, links, and context. You will never doubt Sulit's alignment again.

[damo666]

sdrawkcab

[rdrivera2005]

Maybe this is scum theater putting on a show, I'm not sure, but this is entertaining.

Taking my popcorn

[BunnyGo]

There is actually almost no posting from ND to cite. He posted flavor text for the first couple pages. Then called Chaqa "a retard or straight up scum" for putting a holding vote on him because of the flavor text. Then left the game.

[rdrivera2005]

My four: Temasek, Dargo, Vapor, Foodcoats

[BunnyGo]

Sulit came in aggressive and questioning. His most common post has been:

"Explain why I'm getting voted" or
"Explain why you're voting on me immediately"

Granted, she joined the game on page 60 and had a lot of catching up to do. But she also was interested in doing deep dives:

This is one of her first posts:

Couple questions:

Is there a way to like quickly navigate back to the thread without have to go to forums then forum games etc.?

How do you ISO?

Any way to make it so all the posts are on one page, or can it only be in pages?

Showing she was already thinking about investigating, deep reads, and interacting with the thread and characters.

DESPITE THIS FOCUS ON DETAIL, she made the following slip just a few posts later:

Wait what the heck that was night

Would a scum really think to fake not knowing that it was night?

[RagingIke297]

So the stone says it starts on cooldown, and requires a day end and a night end before being usable. This means Day 1, Night 1. Stone was used on Day 2. Day 2, Night 2, stone *should* be usable on Day 3, right now, or does it not count Day 2...?

##CallGM - the Mind Stone was used on Day 2. Is it usable again on Day 3 (Day2/Night2 as the recharge) or does it not work until Night 3 (Night2/Day3 recharge?)

##Call GM
##GM Call
##YoIke

GM NOTE:

Sorry it took so long!

So it doesn't count the phase its used in as part of the cooldown, mind stone will be off cool down on N3!

[RagingIke297]

##Call GM, at what stage will Vapor be subbed?

When they request one or don't meet post / vote requirements