Again it is a cost benefit. We have to weigh the costs of not intervening vs. the costs of intervention. I am 100% not ignoring that there will be massive costs to climate change...but I also recognize the massive costs of making dramatic changes to our carbon usage when the tech and infrastructure isn't there to replace the fossil fuels. You seem to be only seeing one side of the equation.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 12:51 amFailing to tackle the climate crisis will render large parts of the world uninhabitable and will cause extreme poverty, starvation, and death for more people than you seem willing to realise.
If the models are right, unfortunately a lot of this climate change is already baked in. We aren't going to be able to change it a lot, especially in the near term. We will just need to deal with it. This is just reality.