Again, you're using circular terms here, and still haven't given a logical or evidential basis for them. Until you do, they're meaningless.Esquire Bertissimmo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:27 pmThis is what I mean about being too open minded.
You're missusing the vaccine injury data. It's as simple as that. And no wonder, since you came to it once it had been knowingly mispurposed by an organization with absolutely no stake in truth telling.
What would be a proper use of the reports? And no, I'm not talking about injury data. I'm talking about deaths. Thirty thousand of them in the US and fifty thousand total worldwide.
I could accuse you of the same fault. You disregard evidence on a whim, without any actual reason for doing so. Why is it that fifty thousand reports of death were not enough to even cause a tinge of hesitation for mandating these vaccines?