"Mistake" in the rules?
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:36 pm
Dear all,
I'm fairly new to the forum, so forgive me when this topic has been brought up before.
However, I have been playing the game for quite a while, and I think there is an issue with how the rules are implemented when support is cut. Let me give an example:
GERMANY
Munich MOVE Silesia -> Bounced
Berlin SUPPORT Munich to Silesia -> Support cut by 'f bal - ber'
Kiel SUPPORT Berlin to HOLD -> resolved
RUSSIA
Silesia HOLD -> resolved
Baltic Sea MOVE Berlin -> Bounced
The rules say that support is cut when another unit moves to the area of the supporting unit, no matter whether or not the supporting unit receives support itself. I think that in the example above the support of Berlin shouldn't have been cut, because Kiel supported Berlin to hold.
What do you think of this? Is there an explanation of why the rules are as they are? I'm very curious to hear your opinion!
I'm fairly new to the forum, so forgive me when this topic has been brought up before.
However, I have been playing the game for quite a while, and I think there is an issue with how the rules are implemented when support is cut. Let me give an example:
GERMANY
Munich MOVE Silesia -> Bounced
Berlin SUPPORT Munich to Silesia -> Support cut by 'f bal - ber'
Kiel SUPPORT Berlin to HOLD -> resolved
RUSSIA
Silesia HOLD -> resolved
Baltic Sea MOVE Berlin -> Bounced
The rules say that support is cut when another unit moves to the area of the supporting unit, no matter whether or not the supporting unit receives support itself. I think that in the example above the support of Berlin shouldn't have been cut, because Kiel supported Berlin to hold.
What do you think of this? Is there an explanation of why the rules are as they are? I'm very curious to hear your opinion!