webdiplomacy.net

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

As the GM, I am sorry that this setup turned out to be somewhat town-sided. Of course that was not the intention. I will comment on the assumed balance of the game, and how that did not hold up in the face of real gameplay, in due course.

In the meantime, I hope some of you had fun, and I am sorry that some of you may not have done. Please remember that I am a human being, and bear that in mind in your comments.

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:18 am

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

As the GM, I am sorry that this setup turned out to be somewhat town-sided. Of course that was not the intention. I will comment on the assumed balance of the game, and how that did not hold up in the face of real gameplay, in due course.

In the meantime, I hope some of you had fun, and I am sorry that some of you may not have done. Please remember that I am a human being, and bear that in mind in your comments.

You're good Jamiet. Link to the God QT please

Chaqa wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:18 am

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:16 am

Chaqa wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:14 am

It was not exactly the most balanced setup, but I think the angels literally never doing anything helped town a lot.

It was unclear exactly when action could be taken

I thought perhaps that you would ignite on N4, so it was my thought that we should sneak in a kill power at EoD4 so we can kill off as many town as possible

But you popped it early and then, well, see my earlier post

We had the ability to ignite multiple times. We planned to do a second one tonight.

I feel like the big mistake was killing Vecna. Brain talked me into it

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

As the GM, I am sorry that this setup turned out to be somewhat town-sided. Of course that was not the intention. I will comment on the assumed balance of the game, and how that did not hold up in the face of real gameplay, in due course.

In the meantime, I hope some of you had fun, and I am sorry that some of you may not have done. Please remember that I am a human being, and bear that in mind in your comments.

Chaqa wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:15 am

I was convinced ghug was scum because of how he was simping for DrFidelis.

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:14 am

Chaqa wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:14 am

It was not exactly the most balanced setup, but I think the angels literally never doing anything helped town a lot.

Yes. Blame each other. Feel the power of your hatred. Let the dark side consume you.

To be clear, the angels don't blame the judges for any failing

I made an executive decision to not drag this game into day phases where the vote is tied until fire kills someone, then we play kingmaker between 3 parties. They can hardly be blamed for how they played

Kakarroto wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:20 am

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:14 am

Yes. Blame each other. Feel the power of your hatred. Let the dark side consume you.

To be clear, the angels don't blame the judges for any failing

I made an executive decision to not drag this game into day phases where the vote is tied until fire kills someone, then we play kingmaker between 3 parties. They can hardly be blamed for how they played

even IF judges and angels worked together to vote out town, the game wouldn't necessarily end in any of their favour, since the town can just vote 'no-kill' and not break the balance between the maf-teams

ghug wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:18 am

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

As the GM, I am sorry that this setup turned out to be somewhat town-sided. Of course that was not the intention. I will comment on the assumed balance of the game, and how that did not hold up in the face of real gameplay, in due course.

In the meantime, I hope some of you had fun, and I am sorry that some of you may not have done. Please remember that I am a human being, and bear that in mind in your comments.

I thought it was pretty fun, Jamie. Thank you for running it.

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

As the GM, I am sorry that this setup turned out to be somewhat town-sided. Of course that was not the intention. I will comment on the assumed balance of the game, and how that did not hold up in the face of real gameplay, in due course.

In the meantime, I hope some of you had fun, and I am sorry that some of you may not have done. Please remember that I am a human being, and bear that in mind in your comments.

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:22 am

Kakarroto wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:20 am

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

To be clear, the angels don't blame the judges for any failing

I made an executive decision to not drag this game into day phases where the vote is tied until fire kills someone, then we play kingmaker between 3 parties. They can hardly be blamed for how they played

even IF judges and angels worked together to vote out town, the game wouldn't necessarily end in any of their favour, since the town can just vote 'no-kill' and not break the balance between the maf-teams

Judge fire would kill a bitch

brainbomb wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:23 am

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

As the GM, I am sorry that this setup turned out to be somewhat town-sided. Of course that was not the intention. I will comment on the assumed balance of the game, and how that did not hold up in the face of real gameplay, in due course.

In the meantime, I hope some of you had fun, and I am sorry that some of you may not have done. Please remember that I am a human being, and bear that in mind in your comments.

Dude you are fine
Im not mad

Kakarroto wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:24 am

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:22 am

Kakarroto wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:20 am

even IF judges and angels worked together to vote out town, the game wouldn't necessarily end in any of their favour, since the town can just vote 'no-kill' and not break the balance between the maf-teams

Judge fire would kill a bitch

judge fire had only one left, so could only decide to either go for one townie, or for an angel.

Thus could not break the balance in their favour. If town just doesn't take sides in the maf war, the game never ends.

brainbomb wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:23 am

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:17 am

As the GM, I am sorry that this setup turned out to be somewhat town-sided. Of course that was not the intention. I will comment on the assumed balance of the game, and how that did not hold up in the face of real gameplay, in due course.

In the meantime, I hope some of you had fun, and I am sorry that some of you may not have done. Please remember that I am a human being, and bear that in mind in your comments.

Dude you are fine
Im not mad

brainbomb wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:28 am

I ruined the game for my team.

I claimed a guilty when I didnt need too
I also retracted into a lost position
I then claimed scum openly

And in none of these things did I ever manage to open a lane of opportunity for either scumteam.

I ruined the game and blew it all for everyone involved. Entirely on me

brainbomb wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:28 am

I ruined the game for my team.

I claimed a guilty when I didnt need too
I also retracted into a lost position
I then claimed scum openly

And in none of these things did I ever manage to open a lane of opportunity for either scumteam.

I ruined the game and blew it all for everyone involved. Entirely on me