Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
damo666
Posts: 16597
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5524
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#81 Post by damo666 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:25 am

I agree that it was a bit unsportsmanlike but

A) the no more than 2 consecutive questions rule that I suggested was not formally adopted
B)Standard Rule 2 made no sense in conjunction with the zeroth rule as no answers were discounted
C) The answer was the second guess anyway.

Given the above let it stand but going forward

1) we formally adopt the no more than 2 consecutive questions rule
2) we don't play this format again
2

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29456
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18259
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#82 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:44 am

damo666 wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:25 am
1) we formally adopt the no more than 2 consecutive questions rule
I strongly support this.

JECE please would you add a rule, to the standard set of rules that you post at the start of your round, that says:

"No player shall ask more than two consecutive questions (including making guesses) before another player has asked a question or made a guess."
There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen. - Lenin.

damo666
Posts: 16597
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5524
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#83 Post by damo666 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 12:30 pm

damo666 wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:25 am
I agree that it was a bit unsportsmanlike but

A) the no more than 2 consecutive questions rule that I suggested was not formally adopted
B)Standard Rule 2 made no sense in conjunction with the zeroth rule as no answers were discounted
C) The answer was the second guess anyway.

Given the above let it stand but going forward

1) we formally adopt the no more than 2 consecutive questions rule
2) we don't play this format again
2
Actually B was wrong as it was yes answers that were discounted but hey ho

damo666
Posts: 16597
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5524
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#84 Post by damo666 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 12:30 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:44 am
damo666 wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:25 am
1) we formally adopt the no more than 2 consecutive questions rule
I strongly support this.

JECE please would you add a rule, to the standard set of rules that you post at the start of your round, that says:

"No player shall ask more than two consecutive questions (including making guesses) before another player has asked a question or made a guess."
Bump

User avatar
JECE
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 4:35 pm
Karma: 393
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#85 Post by JECE » Thu Mar 02, 2023 12:41 pm

I'll do that, and otherwise revert to the old 'normal' rules.

I made multiple guesses to get this round over with (as noted, it had been dragging on) and because I had checked and there were still a ton of questions left to ask (so I wasn't sabotaging the 'team's' chances).

To be fair, I had forgotten about the new 2-consecutive-question rule and if I had recalled that rule I would have thought that it was in force. However, as already noted, I still would have won by guessing correctly on the second try. I asked the questions/made the guesses in order, not randomly.
See my full Profile:
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/profile.php?userID=17421

User avatar
JECE
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 4:35 pm
Karma: 393
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#86 Post by JECE » Thu Mar 02, 2023 12:49 pm

han-shahanshah wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:21 am
Kakarroto wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:49 am
However, there is one possibility we aren't sure about so I'm asking it right now: "Does the person we're searching have an english wikipedia page?"
Yes. I kind of gave it away here:
han-shahanshah wrote:
Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:35 pm
Haha, you can now brute force the Wikipedia category.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... th_century
Ah, for some reason I completely skipped over the "brute force" paragraph! I found the subcategory all on my own, ha ha.
See my full Profile:
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/profile.php?userID=17421

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 6121
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Karma: 6252
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#87 Post by dargorygel » Thu Mar 02, 2023 1:21 pm

Personally, regardless of any unofficial official policy, if I ever win again I will be counting the 'if-then' questions as questions.
1

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 6121
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Karma: 6252
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#88 Post by dargorygel » Thu Mar 02, 2023 1:22 pm

I understand JECE's explanation. At this point in this particular game, he was trying to finish, NOT trying to win.

damo666
Posts: 16597
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5524
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#89 Post by damo666 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 3:55 pm

dargorygel wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 1:21 pm
Personally, regardless of any unofficial official policy, if I ever win again I will be counting the 'if-then' questions as questions.
You'll never win again now!
1

User avatar
Kakarroto
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:01 pm
Location: Vienna (hold)
Karma: 1186
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#90 Post by Kakarroto » Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:27 pm

I don't think allowing someone to go through with a situation without consequences and then trying to implement a rule against this situation is a good thing. Politicians try to do that all the way and we are better than them, right?

Personally, I would not respect such a rule, period.

The argument 'but it was the second guess anyway' also doesn't matter in that regard. It was a pure guessing streak. If there was a sign to outwit others by putting in conditional questions (like "is this character described as to be be "truly christian" in the wikipedia page' and then putting "if yes, then is it prince myshkin, if no, is it Rodion Raskolnikov?"), that would've been ok in my mind since that's what the game is about. But that didn't happen, it was a pure guessing streak.

The argument 'people wanted it to end' might be true, but there were also people who wanted to play it out. Sure, it might've dragged a bit, but other games did so in the past too, a hint by the GM is the much better solution. But still, just because some want to end it sooner is not a good argument for ruining the game for others who want to still play it. Or do you all think I'm wrong with this stance/idea?

Anyway, if we implement a rule that states firmly that we aren't allowed to guess more than twice in a row (in addition to asking a question twice in a row), we have to do something about the result of the game. Maybe my 'voiding the game' was too strict, so how about this: the game itself does count, JECE is declared winner and creates the next question, but he doesn't receive a full point for the overall score, only half a point (0.5). This would reflect that we still honour his guess (he was faster than others, after all), but we condemn the method (even if it might've been accidentally from JECE). Half a point is also a tie breaker if JECE is tied with someone in the overall score, so it will still help him out in this regard.

Maybe there is another, better solution, but if we do nothing but implement the rule, we lose the moral ground for the implementation in the future. Is this acceptable for you all?

Octavious
Posts: 3844
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:16 pm
Location: The Five Valleys, Gloucestershire
Karma: 2605
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#91 Post by Octavious » Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:49 pm

Heaven forfend that the winner of the controversial game 96 is remembered years from now with the same reverence as the winners of 17 and 43
I eat cookies to improve my snacking experience

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29456
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18259
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#92 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:14 pm

Kakarroto wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:27 pm
I don't think allowing someone to go through with a situation without consequences and then trying to implement a rule against this situation is a good thing. Politicians try to do that all the way and we are better than them, right?

Personally, I would not respect such a rule, period.

The argument 'but it was the second guess anyway' also doesn't matter in that regard. It was a pure guessing streak. If there was a sign to outwit others by putting in conditional questions (like "is this character described as to be be "truly christian" in the wikipedia page' and then putting "if yes, then is it prince myshkin, if no, is it Rodion Raskolnikov?"), that would've been ok in my mind since that's what the game is about. But that didn't happen, it was a pure guessing streak.

The argument 'people wanted it to end' might be true, but there were also people who wanted to play it out. Sure, it might've dragged a bit, but other games did so in the past too, a hint by the GM is the much better solution. But still, just because some want to end it sooner is not a good argument for ruining the game for others who want to still play it. Or do you all think I'm wrong with this stance/idea?

Anyway, if we implement a rule that states firmly that we aren't allowed to guess more than twice in a row (in addition to asking a question twice in a row), we have to do something about the result of the game. Maybe my 'voiding the game' was too strict, so how about this: the game itself does count, JECE is declared winner and creates the next question, but he doesn't receive a full point for the overall score, only half a point (0.5). This would reflect that we still honour his guess (he was faster than others, after all), but we condemn the method (even if it might've been accidentally from JECE). Half a point is also a tie breaker if JECE is tied with someone in the overall score, so it will still help him out in this regard.

Maybe there is another, better solution, but if we do nothing but implement the rule, we lose the moral ground for the implementation in the future. Is this acceptable for you all?
What are you even talking about?

What do you want us to do?

Ban JECE from playing?

Fine him $200?

Throw him in jail?

Throw his cats in cat jail?

Get a grip. It's a fun little game. Have some sense of perspective.
There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen. - Lenin.

Octavious
Posts: 3844
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:16 pm
Location: The Five Valleys, Gloucestershire
Karma: 2605
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#93 Post by Octavious » Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:32 pm

As amusingly OTT as it is, there's something appealing about Kakarroto's enthusiasm. I don't mind it at all.

Don't mind the idea of gaoling JECE either, come to think of it... Bit harsh on the cats, though
I eat cookies to improve my snacking experience

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 6121
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Karma: 6252
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#94 Post by dargorygel » Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:36 pm

Any rule changes do not effect past games. Any cat jail does not effect future dinners.
1

damo666
Posts: 16597
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5524
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#95 Post by damo666 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:20 pm

dargorygel wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:36 pm
Any rule changes do not effect past games. Any cat jail does not effect future dinners.
affect

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29456
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18259
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#96 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Mar 03, 2023 1:33 am

I suggest that JECE incorporate a new rule, and that's all.
There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen. - Lenin.

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 6121
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Karma: 6252
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#97 Post by dargorygel » Fri Mar 03, 2023 2:33 am

damo666 wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:20 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:36 pm
Any rule changes do not effect past games. Any cat jail does not effect future dinners.
affect
Oops

User avatar
JECE
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 4:35 pm
Karma: 393
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#98 Post by JECE » Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:10 am

dargorygel wrote:
Fri Mar 03, 2023 2:33 am
damo666 wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:20 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:36 pm
Any rule changes do not effect past games. Any cat jail does not effect future dinners.
affect
Oops
A cat jail does in fact effect future dinners if the captivity facilitates eating cats.
See my full Profile:
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/profile.php?userID=17421

User avatar
JECE
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 4:35 pm
Karma: 393
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#99 Post by JECE » Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:44 am

Kakarroto wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:27 pm
The argument 'but it was the second guess anyway' also doesn't matter in that regard. It was a pure guessing streak. If there was a sign to outwit others by putting in conditional questions (like "is this character described as to be be "truly christian" in the wikipedia page' and then putting "if yes, then is it prince myshkin, if no, is it Rodion Raskolnikov?"), that would've been ok in my mind since that's what the game is about. But that didn't happen, it was a pure guessing streak.
Sheesh, why are you so sure that you know what is in my head? As I wrote above, I did not ask the questions in random order. I did my research. I used process of elimination (after reading through all the questions that had been asked and skimming through the five articles) to rule out Nastasya Filippovna (woman) and Fyodor Karamazov (died). I then basically ranked the questions based on how long the articles for the remaining characters were and guessed Prince Myshkin since his article is much longer than the other two. That Fyodor Karamazov, a fellow character from The Brothers Karamazov, had already been guessed seemed to suggest that Alyosha Karamazov was not as important a character in his book as Prince Myshkin and Rodion Raskolnikov might be in their own books. So I went with Rodion Raskolnikov for my second guess less than a minute later. If you check the timestamps you can see that it took me another seven minutes before I decided that I might as well guess Alyosha Karamazov too, even if he was unlikely to be the answer.
Kakarroto wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:27 pm
The argument 'people wanted it to end' might be true, but there were also people who wanted to play it out. Sure, it might've dragged a bit, but other games did so in the past too, a hint by the GM is the much better solution. But still, just because some want to end it sooner is not a good argument for ruining the game for others who want to still play it. Or do you all think I'm wrong with this stance/idea?
The GM hinted that the game was as good as over, which I interpreted as the GM wanting the game to end:
han-shahanshah wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 3:52 am
That makes it go to the next player on here I guess, as there are only so many Dostoyevsky characters on Wikipedia.
Also keep in mind, Kakarroto (just realizing now how funny that name sounds in Spanish), that your legalistic argument falls flat when you consider I still had a free guess available to me.
See my full Profile:
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/profile.php?userID=17421

User avatar
Kakarroto
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:01 pm
Location: Vienna (hold)
Karma: 1186
Contact:

Re: Twenty Questions Game the Ninety-Sixth

#100 Post by Kakarroto » Fri Mar 03, 2023 1:07 pm

JECE wrote:
Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:44 am
Sheesh, why are you so sure that you know what is in my head? As I wrote above, I did not ask the questions in random order. I did my research. I used process of elimination (after reading through all the questions that had been asked and skimming through the five articles) to rule out Nastasya Filippovna (woman) and Fyodor Karamazov (died). I then basically ranked the questions based on how long the articles for the remaining characters were and guessed Prince Myshkin since his article is much longer than the other two. That Fyodor Karamazov, a fellow character from The Brothers Karamazov, had already been guessed seemed to suggest that Alyosha Karamazov was not as important a character in his book as Prince Myshkin and Rodion Raskolnikov might be in their own books. So I went with Rodion Raskolnikov for my second guess less than a minute later. If you check the timestamps you can see that it took me another seven minutes before I decided that I might as well guess Alyosha Karamazov too, even if he was unlikely to be the answer.
I had the same thought progress about elimination, could instantly take out Nastasya, had the same four out there and read careful their pages and could also reduce Fyodor because of the speech on his grave. I did practically the same steps in research as you, was just a few minutes short to post since I also thought about how to best reduce that pool by a question and not just guess it. I've never even considered the idea to just post these three guesses because that would just be ... unthinkable.

You just confirm it yourself, you didn't think about it as questions, only as guesses and ranking the options. This is the point I criticise! At this point, at least for english wikipedia pages, those three options were the only possible guesses. In a few seconds you grabbed 66.6 (periodically) percent of possible guesses, seven minutes later you took the full 100 percent. Without trying to outwit your opponents with a question. You didn't care about the game or others, you just cared about the result and kicked everyone else playing somewhere it hurts.

Your actions don't lie, or did I misinterpret them because you were totally thinking something else?
The GM hinted that the game was as good as over, which I interpreted as the GM wanting the game to end:
han-shahanshah wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 3:52 am
That makes it go to the next player on here I guess, as there are only so many Dostoyevsky characters on Wikipedia.
That doesn't mean you are the only one left playing and trying. We had longer games and games where people wanted to end sooner, but to my memory we didn't have a situation like this. I'm not even sure how you could've come to the idea that nobody would play on with that answer from the GM only 45 minutes before you posted your guess streak in a Forum that spans world wide with different time zones.
Also keep in mind, Kakarroto (just realizing now how funny that name sounds in Spanish), that your legalistic argument falls flat when you consider I still had a free guess available to me.
(my name also sounds funny in german and other languages)

Just because something is 'free' doesn't mean it isn't additional. It means that you don't have to pay for it.

But if you want to bring free guesses in, you robbed every other player their free guesses by grabbing all the valid options for yourself with your actions.

===

Look, I don't do this here because I feel robbed of a win or something. I'm pretty sure I would've lost any pure guess battle because my prefered list was 1) Alyosha 2) Prince Myshkin and 3) Rodion; but I totally feel that this game was ruined by that 100% triple guess streak.

There was nothing left over for others that played and invested the same (if not more) time in sorting the works and characters out. There was no intent to play the game with sorting the three characters with questions. It was at a time where Europe was deep in the night and most players couldn't react to anything. (ok that last point is only partly relevant because there will always be times where there is a breakthrough and multiple players work it out in short notice, but this is not a situation with multiple players) (also personally, I stayed up to try to not miss a hint because I was invested in this and I noticed han posts more often at such times)

I wouldn't have said anything if you had stayed with your two initial guesses. (I might not like it but I'd still consider that in the regions of fairness.) I wouldn't have said anything if you thought about an elaborate plan to ask two questions with "if yes/no clauses" to sort through the characters on basis of their characteristics even if in that process you'd kinda guess all three, but that would show a respect to the game even when fairness wasn't included in that, but I could begrudgingly accept that action.

But, as I said, you neither had respect nor fairness in mind with that triple guess streak, but only the result. You might say we can't see into your head, but your actions are there to speak for you. I also can't read any hint of regret or any form of excuse in that answer. Only arguments and justifications. It reads as if JECE thinks he is absolutely in the right and has done nothing wrong and will do it again in the future. If we let this go through without consequences, future games will be less fun and we likely experience a downward spiral from here on out. At least, this is what I believe.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fatmo and 250 guests