M1020 — Speed Run Mafia GAME THREAD [HIDDEN]

[damo666]

I wanna hear your reasons for this specific pairing

pairing?

grouping or whatever

Sabi as per previous, you and DL for defending him. Added Snowy for Jamie.

[Bonatogether]

pairing?

grouping or whatever

Sabi as per previous, you and DL for defending them. Added Snowy for Jamie.

I didn't defend them?

[President Eden]

for the bot (fuck you):

dargorygel has replaced worcej

[damo666]

grouping or whatever

Sabi as per previous, you and DL for defending them. Added Snowy for Jamie.

I didn't defend them?

Apols re pronoun. I'll find it.

[Chaqa]

PLEASE HOLD, BREAKING THE BOT TO FIX THE BOT

GAME HAS ENDED

[damo666]

@worcej and @ Bona join me on Sabi. Let's stir it up.

i'll pass

they'll self resolve in a few days

I was thinking of this. No, it wasn't a defend but was an unwillingness to vote them after doubting them. Anyway not as bad as I thought.

[Chaqa]

didn't work

GAME HAS UNENDED

bot may be broke tho

[Bonatogether]

Game Status
Game is missing some parameters to be displayed:
Users: dargorygel exist(s) more than once in the group of GMs and players

[ghug]

pairing?

grouping or whatever

Sabi as per previous, you and DL for defending them. Added Snowy for Jamie.

[foodcoats]

GG bo, sorry for voting you out.

Why did you pick Bo over Snowy or Bona?

Least bad choice.

[ghug]

GG bo, sorry for voting you out.

Why did you pick Bo over Snowy or Bona?

Least bad choice.

Why?

[dargorygel]

Bot is fixed.
Yay darg.

Ok, I have read through once (I had been vaguely watching till last night, so it wasn't too much)
It seems the only controversial thing is sabi's questions.

I think sabi’s questions are fine. It does not taste like tryharding to me. Seems very responsive to answers and disagreements.

I also would have voted for bo.

[dargorygel]

@bona
Do you still think celaph was defending you? He denied it, and I didn't notice a further discussion from you.

[dargorygel]

Hiya
I'm reading. I'm sure I'll be up by eon. Summaries appreciated.

Sabi been very vocal, either tryharding or pretending. Bozo absentish. Everyone else more or less as per usual. Lots of vote swapping near EOD probably the most interesting aspect thus far.

I see what looks like some tie preventions... strange that it ended up SO overkill on bo. Later unnecessary votes are unlikely to be scum, right?

[Bonatogether]

@bona
Do you still think celaph was defending you? He denied it, and I didn't notice a further discussion from you.

It wasn't defending per se, but it was definitely something that would have pushed people away from my wagon.

[Bonatogether]

Hiya
I'm reading. I'm sure I'll be up by eon. Summaries appreciated.

Sabi been very vocal, either tryharding or pretending. Bozo absentish. Everyone else more or less as per usual. Lots of vote swapping near EOD probably the most interesting aspect thus far.

I see what looks like some tie preventions... strange that it ended up SO overkill on bo. Later unnecessary votes are unlikely to be scum, right?

I agree

[ghug]

Hiya
I'm reading. I'm sure I'll be up by eon. Summaries appreciated.

Sabi been very vocal, either tryharding or pretending. Bozo absentish. Everyone else more or less as per usual. Lots of vote swapping near EOD probably the most interesting aspect thus far.

I see what looks like some tie preventions... strange that it ended up SO overkill on bo. Later unnecessary votes are unlikely to be scum, right?

Pile on votes are not very alignment indicative.

[ghug]

Bona, when you do your VCA, can you consider the case where you're scum so I don't have to do the work myself?

[Bonatogether]

Bona, when you do your VCA, can you consider the case where you're scum so I don't have to do the work myself?

yeah, i can give you it rn

[dargorygel]

Sabi been very vocal, either tryharding or pretending. Bozo absentish. Everyone else more or less as per usual. Lots of vote swapping near EOD probably the most interesting aspect thus far.

I see what looks like some tie preventions... strange that it ended up SO overkill on bo. Later unnecessary votes are unlikely to be scum, right?

Pile on votes are not very alignment indicative.

probs... but i am not sure they were pile on. They might have been tie prevention, yes?