M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
I have a theory.
(hit post too soon lol)
Also, I’m pretty sure aaro is on board with shooting down the line. It’s just Bona who’s not. (And the mafia lol)
(hit post too soon lol)
Also, I’m pretty sure aaro is on board with shooting down the line. It’s just Bona who’s not. (And the mafia lol)
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Uh... No? I do not remember that.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:13 pmDo you remember when food outed as Cleric?Ezio wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:06 pmI'm scared of these comments from Aaro and Bona scumreading each other and shit.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:01 pm
that’s exactly why I want to kill him while I’m still alive to ensure it happens lol.
I don’t know if I trust y’all not to blow this :/
I'm worried Food is gonna convince them to flip.
FWIW, I'd vote we flip food tomorrow for exactly this reason...
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
I broke my sacred promise and read posts from before I subbed in.
It looks like foodcoats started “softing” Cleric N2. N2 and N3, he relayed ghost chat messages in the form of our somewhat typical “tales from the god chat” parody style. I’d consider this “softing” because it’s still got plausible deniability as a joke.
He hardclaims by N4, relaying ghost messages point blank without any plausible deniability.
ghug died D3. Could ghug have been the final PR, giving foodcoats cover to claim?
It looks like foodcoats started “softing” Cleric N2. N2 and N3, he relayed ghost chat messages in the form of our somewhat typical “tales from the god chat” parody style. I’d consider this “softing” because it’s still got plausible deniability as a joke.
He hardclaims by N4, relaying ghost messages point blank without any plausible deniability.
ghug died D3. Could ghug have been the final PR, giving foodcoats cover to claim?
-
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2020 1:23 am
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
This is true. I don’t think bona is scum. If he were, I see no reason to try to set me up to be a miskill instead of whoever would have to be town in the food/will/worcej grouping.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:15 pmI have a theory.
(hit post too soon lol)
Also, I’m pretty sure aaro is on board with shooting down the line. It’s just Bona who’s not. (And the mafia lol)
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
I suppose it's possible ghug was the final PR. I remember there was a bit about squiggs I think posting a reference to a game with Sweet or something to Sweet specifically and Sweet confirmed it, which makes me think Food is probably actually that role.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:34 pmI broke my sacred promise and read posts from before I subbed in.
It looks like foodcoats started “softing” Cleric N2. N2 and N3, he relayed ghost chat messages in the form of our somewhat typical “tales from the god chat” parody style. I’d consider this “softing” because it’s still got plausible deniability as a joke.
He hardclaims by N4, relaying ghost messages point blank without any plausible deniability.
ghug died D3. Could ghug have been the final PR, giving foodcoats cover to claim?
-
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2020 1:23 am
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
I’m reading Eden’s theory as saying food is actually cleric and the cover is a reference to the number of town PR.Ezio wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:42 pmI suppose it's possible ghug was the final PR. I remember there was a bit about squiggs I think posting a reference to a game with Sweet or something to Sweet specifically and Sweet confirmed it, which makes me think Food is probably actually that role.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:34 pmI broke my sacred promise and read posts from before I subbed in.
It looks like foodcoats started “softing” Cleric N2. N2 and N3, he relayed ghost chat messages in the form of our somewhat typical “tales from the god chat” parody style. I’d consider this “softing” because it’s still got plausible deniability as a joke.
He hardclaims by N4, relaying ghost messages point blank without any plausible deniability.
ghug died D3. Could ghug have been the final PR, giving foodcoats cover to claim?
-
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2020 1:23 am
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
I find it basically impossible to believe that food was doing that all as a non-cleric. I also asked ghug a baseball question through him and got what I think is actual ghug answer.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
aarodactyl wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:44 pmI’m reading Eden’s theory as saying food is actually cleric and the cover is a reference to the number of town PR.Ezio wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:42 pmI suppose it's possible ghug was the final PR. I remember there was a bit about squiggs I think posting a reference to a game with Sweet or something to Sweet specifically and Sweet confirmed it, which makes me think Food is probably actually that role.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:34 pmI broke my sacred promise and read posts from before I subbed in.
It looks like foodcoats started “softing” Cleric N2. N2 and N3, he relayed ghost chat messages in the form of our somewhat typical “tales from the god chat” parody style. I’d consider this “softing” because it’s still got plausible deniability as a joke.
He hardclaims by N4, relaying ghost messages point blank without any plausible deniability.
ghug died D3. Could ghug have been the final PR, giving foodcoats cover to claim?
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Was this before or after food reported that ghug claimed to be VT?aarodactyl wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:48 pmI find it basically impossible to believe that food was doing that all as a non-cleric. I also asked ghug a baseball question through him and got what I think is actual ghug answer.
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak
Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik
Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik
-
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2020 1:23 am
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
I think would have had to be after but I haven’t checked to be sure. I see what you’re getting at though. Seems unlikely ghug would be anything other than VT.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:59 pmWas this before or after food reported that ghug claimed to be VT?aarodactyl wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:48 pmI find it basically impossible to believe that food was doing that all as a non-cleric. I also asked ghug a baseball question through him and got what I think is actual ghug answer.
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
unlikely but we can't assume. if scum believed that ghug was pr, shooting him when they did makes senseaarodactyl wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:20 pmI think would have had to be after but I haven’t checked to be sure. I see what you’re getting at though. Seems unlikely ghug would be anything other than VT.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:59 pmWas this before or after food reported that ghug claimed to be VT?aarodactyl wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:48 pmI find it basically impossible to believe that food was doing that all as a non-cleric. I also asked ghug a baseball question through him and got what I think is actual ghug answer.
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Hmm
@kaka: how am I an Austrian?
@ghug: what’s your take on all the new MLB rules?
@sweet: what’s the difference between analysis, algebra, and logic?
@kaka: how am I an Austrian?
@ghug: what’s your take on all the new MLB rules?
@sweet: what’s the difference between analysis, algebra, and logic?
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak
Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik
Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Not to belabour the point, but at this stage, the best I can do is try to illuminate my own alignment so I am not a miskill.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:35 pmunlikely but we can't assume. if scum believed that ghug was pr, shooting him when they did makes senseaarodactyl wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:20 pmI think would have had to be after but I haven’t checked to be sure. I see what you’re getting at though. Seems unlikely ghug would be anything other than VT.
For me to be scum, I had to make a claim about ghug’s alignment and role EON3 after conferring with the scum team and MM, who had janitored him. Even if I was tadpoled, I would still have been able to discuss it with them. I would therefore be part of a decision to complicate any possible future claim by my teammate MM, as part of the story would be “locked in” in advance - which is clearly suboptimal.
I also, if NOT tadpoled but original scum, would have been claiming my role when I could have just told the dead, or later rather legitimately claimed, that I would not reveal unless I had mechanical information.
Surely scum can play suboptimally. However, I have recently pontificated (outside of the actual game) that the more mechanical information there is in the game, the easier it is for town to solve. Would I really want to so easily give up two points of mechanical reference to town if I was scum?
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
I will ask these questions but only Kak and yoyo are active in the gravechat now. I believe sweet at least passed onto GT.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
You’ll note that we’ve already explored these arguments throughout the game and found they weighed in your favor. We question your alignment right now not because your play makes sense as a mafia PR but because it sure does look like you were one of four players who voted for mafia to win the game in a 5-4 LYLO situation, and that evidence, if true, vastly outweighs any “why would scum PR play like this” speculation.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:56 pmNot to belabour the point, but at this stage, the best I can do is try to illuminate my own alignment so I am not a miskill.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:35 pmunlikely but we can't assume. if scum believed that ghug was pr, shooting him when they did makes senseaarodactyl wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:20 pm
I think would have had to be after but I haven’t checked to be sure. I see what you’re getting at though. Seems unlikely ghug would be anything other than VT.
For me to be scum, I had to make a claim about ghug’s alignment and role EON3 after conferring with the scum team and MM, who had janitored him. Even if I was tadpoled, I would still have been able to discuss it with them. I would therefore be part of a decision to complicate any possible future claim by my teammate MM, as part of the story would be “locked in” in advance - which is clearly suboptimal.
I also, if NOT tadpoled but original scum, would have been claiming my role when I could have just told the dead, or later rather legitimately claimed, that I would not reveal unless I had mechanical information.
Surely scum can play suboptimally. However, I have recently pontificated (outside of the actual game) that the more mechanical information there is in the game, the easier it is for town to solve. Would I really want to so easily give up two points of mechanical reference to town if I was scum?
You’d be better off telling us who the other mafia is besides you, and why they chose not to win the game when you offered them the chance.
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
I addressed this as well. If I was scum, then I was not truly apathetic and detached but waiting, lurking, and plotting. If so, why did I return to place my vote on Bunny when I did? It is not difficult to mask my online presence, have a vote ready, have time.is open, and cast the deciding vote with a few seconds left. Why would I play my cards 10 minutes before EOD? If there was an exodus off Bunny’s wagon I could simply wait until the following day to continue the ruse and not expose myself.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:04 pmYou’ll note that we’ve already explored these arguments throughout the game and found they weighed in your favor. We question your alignment right now not because your play makes sense as a mafia PR but because it sure does look like you were one of four players who voted for mafia to win the game in a 5-4 LYLO situation, and that evidence, if true, vastly outweighs any “why would scum PR play like this” speculation.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:56 pmNot to belabour the point, but at this stage, the best I can do is try to illuminate my own alignment so I am not a miskill.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:35 pm
unlikely but we can't assume. if scum believed that ghug was pr, shooting him when they did makes sense
For me to be scum, I had to make a claim about ghug’s alignment and role EON3 after conferring with the scum team and MM, who had janitored him. Even if I was tadpoled, I would still have been able to discuss it with them. I would therefore be part of a decision to complicate any possible future claim by my teammate MM, as part of the story would be “locked in” in advance - which is clearly suboptimal.
I also, if NOT tadpoled but original scum, would have been claiming my role when I could have just told the dead, or later rather legitimately claimed, that I would not reveal unless I had mechanical information.
Surely scum can play suboptimally. However, I have recently pontificated (outside of the actual game) that the more mechanical information there is in the game, the easier it is for town to solve. Would I really want to so easily give up two points of mechanical reference to town if I was scum?
You’d be better off telling us who the other mafia is besides you, and why they chose not to win the game when you offered them the chance.
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Easy: you were lurking. You saw Eden came back and switched correctly. You realized the game wasn't over and panicked, hoping to survive the inevitable grind.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:20 pmI addressed this as well. If I was scum, then I was not truly apathetic and detached but waiting, lurking, and plotting. If so, why did I return to place my vote on Bunny when I did? It is not difficult to mask my online presence, have a vote ready, have time.is open, and cast the deciding vote with a few seconds left. Why would I play my cards 10 minutes before EOD? If there was an exodus off Bunny’s wagon I could simply wait until the following day to continue the ruse and not expose myself.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:04 pmYou’ll note that we’ve already explored these arguments throughout the game and found they weighed in your favor. We question your alignment right now not because your play makes sense as a mafia PR but because it sure does look like you were one of four players who voted for mafia to win the game in a 5-4 LYLO situation, and that evidence, if true, vastly outweighs any “why would scum PR play like this” speculation.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:56 pm
Not to belabour the point, but at this stage, the best I can do is try to illuminate my own alignment so I am not a miskill.
For me to be scum, I had to make a claim about ghug’s alignment and role EON3 after conferring with the scum team and MM, who had janitored him. Even if I was tadpoled, I would still have been able to discuss it with them. I would therefore be part of a decision to complicate any possible future claim by my teammate MM, as part of the story would be “locked in” in advance - which is clearly suboptimal.
I also, if NOT tadpoled but original scum, would have been claiming my role when I could have just told the dead, or later rather legitimately claimed, that I would not reveal unless I had mechanical information.
Surely scum can play suboptimally. However, I have recently pontificated (outside of the actual game) that the more mechanical information there is in the game, the easier it is for town to solve. Would I really want to so easily give up two points of mechanical reference to town if I was scum?
You’d be better off telling us who the other mafia is besides you, and why they chose not to win the game when you offered them the chance.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Again, that’s all fair. If we just set aside the end result of last phase, you seemed pretty townie to me by the total body of work. I agree with your argument here.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:20 pmI addressed this as well. If I was scum, then I was not truly apathetic and detached but waiting, lurking, and plotting. If so, why did I return to place my vote on Bunny when I did? It is not difficult to mask my online presence, have a vote ready, have time.is open, and cast the deciding vote with a few seconds left. Why would I play my cards 10 minutes before EOD? If there was an exodus off Bunny’s wagon I could simply wait until the following day to continue the ruse and not expose myself.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:04 pmYou’ll note that we’ve already explored these arguments throughout the game and found they weighed in your favor. We question your alignment right now not because your play makes sense as a mafia PR but because it sure does look like you were one of four players who voted for mafia to win the game in a 5-4 LYLO situation, and that evidence, if true, vastly outweighs any “why would scum PR play like this” speculation.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:56 pm
Not to belabour the point, but at this stage, the best I can do is try to illuminate my own alignment so I am not a miskill.
For me to be scum, I had to make a claim about ghug’s alignment and role EON3 after conferring with the scum team and MM, who had janitored him. Even if I was tadpoled, I would still have been able to discuss it with them. I would therefore be part of a decision to complicate any possible future claim by my teammate MM, as part of the story would be “locked in” in advance - which is clearly suboptimal.
I also, if NOT tadpoled but original scum, would have been claiming my role when I could have just told the dead, or later rather legitimately claimed, that I would not reveal unless I had mechanical information.
Surely scum can play suboptimally. However, I have recently pontificated (outside of the actual game) that the more mechanical information there is in the game, the easier it is for town to solve. Would I really want to so easily give up two points of mechanical reference to town if I was scum?
You’d be better off telling us who the other mafia is besides you, and why they chose not to win the game when you offered them the chance.
But it doesn’t remotely stack up to “Ezio, aaro, Bona, and Eden could have flipped their votes at EOD and won the game for scum.”
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Yesterday was like the clearest cut LYLO ever. We had town PR claim, and it was counterclaimed by a scum PR. Classic.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:30 pmAgain, that’s all fair. If we just set aside the end result of last phase, you seemed pretty townie to me by the total body of work. I agree with your argument here.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:20 pmI addressed this as well. If I was scum, then I was not truly apathetic and detached but waiting, lurking, and plotting. If so, why did I return to place my vote on Bunny when I did? It is not difficult to mask my online presence, have a vote ready, have time.is open, and cast the deciding vote with a few seconds left. Why would I play my cards 10 minutes before EOD? If there was an exodus off Bunny’s wagon I could simply wait until the following day to continue the ruse and not expose myself.President Eden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 7:04 pm
You’ll note that we’ve already explored these arguments throughout the game and found they weighed in your favor. We question your alignment right now not because your play makes sense as a mafia PR but because it sure does look like you were one of four players who voted for mafia to win the game in a 5-4 LYLO situation, and that evidence, if true, vastly outweighs any “why would scum PR play like this” speculation.
You’d be better off telling us who the other mafia is besides you, and why they chose not to win the game when you offered them the chance.
But it doesn’t remotely stack up to “Ezio, aaro, Bona, and Eden could have flipped their votes at EOD and won the game for scum.”
Scum could very easily have won the game there. I think they expected to, after how shitty my "towncore" was. Eden and I both had food and Worcej as towncore. It makes *perfect* sense why the Mafia would go all in on this play. It didn't work this time, but it usually will.
Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread
Ezio, Eden:
I think you should think more deeply. You are just as convinced I am scum as I was convinced sweet was. You believe the game is in a neat little bow and that there is a single interpretation of the game that "must" be correct. You apparently see no world where scum would hedge until the final second - just as I could not believe sweet would claim Iatrophobe as town. In particular, your belief that scum would all transparently sit on Bunny at 10 minutes out, despite the evidence presented in the thread which made for a mechanically correct Monarch elimination, suggests you have not played Mafia before, which I know is not the case, so I encourage you to remember past games where this has happened against you (I know I have seen the final votes come in from the people I most townread just before the "Hold" message and felt my stomach drop out).
I apologize for the bad play on my part. But if you are town, you are also playing badly by not learning from the last miskill that appearances can be deceiving.
I think you should think more deeply. You are just as convinced I am scum as I was convinced sweet was. You believe the game is in a neat little bow and that there is a single interpretation of the game that "must" be correct. You apparently see no world where scum would hedge until the final second - just as I could not believe sweet would claim Iatrophobe as town. In particular, your belief that scum would all transparently sit on Bunny at 10 minutes out, despite the evidence presented in the thread which made for a mechanically correct Monarch elimination, suggests you have not played Mafia before, which I know is not the case, so I encourage you to remember past games where this has happened against you (I know I have seen the final votes come in from the people I most townread just before the "Hold" message and felt my stomach drop out).
I apologize for the bad play on my part. But if you are town, you are also playing badly by not learning from the last miskill that appearances can be deceiving.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hominidae