M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7961 Post by Vecna » Mon May 11, 2020 6:01 pm

Hey bozo, do you have an overview with all the visits done on every night by every claimed role?

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7962 Post by bozotheclown » Mon May 11, 2020 6:04 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 5:58 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 5:51 pm
Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 5:48 pm
So youre using logic that relies on 3 people being scum together?
Why not, we are probably looking for 3 scum.
I think this depends.

If foodcoats is town, it can easily be 4 remaining, seeing how scum and 3p are effectively denied an entire night of kills when the LR is activated.

Regardless, if I was going to bus, why not just squigs? Was a pretty perfect target to bus
Do you now think Squigs is scum?

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7963 Post by bozotheclown » Mon May 11, 2020 6:04 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:01 pm
Hey bozo, do you have an overview with all the visits done on every night by every claimed role?
no

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7964 Post by Vecna » Mon May 11, 2020 6:10 pm

Im sort of in a 50/50 situation now

Either we have max 1 scum in the QT and most of the obvious slots are scum

Or we have some sneaky conspiracy going on.

I dont think Fox or squigs have done anything in particular that has given me a strong read there. I suck at reading fox in general, and he had some scummy and some ok things going on. Squigs got thrown into a game with like 250 pages, so I dont really think its a smart move to try to read scum intention into him just chilling. Especially since its understandable he'd be "ok" getting lynched and just blowing up the most likely other scum.

I think the play from the slot couldve come from either alignment.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 34480
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7965 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon May 11, 2020 6:15 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:08 pm
Also jamiet, I mightve been very vocal - but why did you not do the deductions yourself?

Town tracker + town watcher + town lie detector + town motion detector + town? xorxes + 3-4 town protectives?

I promised to stop the mechanical stuff, but this is so overwhelmingly crazy. Why do I need to do the yelling and why is not anyone else noticing that something just does not add up?
When were there four protective claims?

I know there were two town protectives because one of them is me, and one of them was Brainbomb.

We know there was a town tracker and a town watcher and a town lie detector and a town motion detector. If you are town, your continued disbelief that town would have so many kewl roles has led you to several totally wrong conclusions so far, I'm afraid.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14307
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7966 Post by Chaqa » Mon May 11, 2020 6:16 pm

Neph has repeatedly said his role is not Protective but Roleblocking as well.

As has Foodcoats.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7967 Post by bozotheclown » Mon May 11, 2020 6:17 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:10 pm
Im sort of in a 50/50 situation now

Either we have max 1 scum in the QT and most of the obvious slots are scum

Or we have some sneaky conspiracy going on.

I dont think Fox or squigs have done anything in particular that has given me a strong read there. I suck at reading fox in general, and he had some scummy and some ok things going on. Squigs got thrown into a game with like 250 pages, so I dont really think its a smart move to try to read scum intention into him just chilling. Especially since its understandable he'd be "ok" getting lynched and just blowing up the most likely other scum.

I think the play from the slot couldve come from either alignment.
What about so many players following your switch from Squigs to Temasek? If Squigs was town, the mafia could have taken out both by lynching Squigs, rather than let Squigs be lynched D6 when his target could be scum.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 34480
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7968 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon May 11, 2020 6:18 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:12 pm
Both Fox and Neph so far have done weird reaction tests, making a big show of asking people for input and never doing anything relevant with it afterwards
Good point.

@NEPH: Could you explain your survey / test yesterday please?

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7969 Post by bozotheclown » Mon May 11, 2020 6:19 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:15 pm
Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:08 pm
Also jamiet, I mightve been very vocal - but why did you not do the deductions yourself?

Town tracker + town watcher + town lie detector + town motion detector + town? xorxes + 3-4 town protectives?

I promised to stop the mechanical stuff, but this is so overwhelmingly crazy. Why do I need to do the yelling and why is not anyone else noticing that something just does not add up?
When were there four protective claims?

I know there were two town protectives because one of them is me, and one of them was Brainbomb.

We know there was a town tracker and a town watcher and a town lie detector and a town motion detector. If you are town, your continued disbelief that town would have so many kewl roles has led you to several totally wrong conclusions so far, I'm afraid.
The driver was protective, and the JOAT was partially protective.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 34480
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7970 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon May 11, 2020 6:20 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:28 pm
Remind me, does a strongman generally kill JAILKEPT targets?
Yes. Strongman can usually get past Jailor.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 34480
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7971 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon May 11, 2020 6:22 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 4:30 pm
I cannot continue being wrong.
Unless
you
are
doing
it
on
purpose

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7972 Post by Vecna » Mon May 11, 2020 6:31 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:16 pm
Neph has repeatedly said his role is not Protective but Roleblocking as well.

As has Foodcoats.
I meant protective as in a "they can save important PRs from death"

Not in an adjudication and how it interacts with the inquisitor sort of way.

@jamiet: busdriver, Jailkeeper, doc, whatever you are, and even the JOAT had 2 protective actions.

That makes 4-5 even if you and Neph are town.

Anyways, im guessing the way the game was intended to be balanced by the GM was that town was going to lose a bunch of those roles to the inquisitor, so who knows.

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7973 Post by Vecna » Mon May 11, 2020 6:32 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:20 pm
Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:28 pm
Remind me, does a strongman generally kill JAILKEPT targets?
Yes. Strongman can usually get past Jailor.
You certain about this?

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7974 Post by Vecna » Mon May 11, 2020 6:39 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:17 pm
Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:10 pm
Im sort of in a 50/50 situation now

Either we have max 1 scum in the QT and most of the obvious slots are scum

Or we have some sneaky conspiracy going on.

I dont think Fox or squigs have done anything in particular that has given me a strong read there. I suck at reading fox in general, and he had some scummy and some ok things going on. Squigs got thrown into a game with like 250 pages, so I dont really think its a smart move to try to read scum intention into him just chilling. Especially since its understandable he'd be "ok" getting lynched and just blowing up the most likely other scum.

I think the play from the slot couldve come from either alignment.
What about so many players following your switch from Squigs to Temasek? If Squigs was town, the mafia could have taken out both by lynching Squigs, rather than let Squigs be lynched D6 when his target could be scum.
That is unpredictable though. I was telling squigs to directly take out Xorxes. Town temasek couldve moved off the wagon as well if he came back last minute. Maybe a bunch of the townies sheeped me, and there were more scum than town remaining on the squigs wagon?

Switching to Tem was the guaranteed good outcome for scum. They could simply blame it on me. Squigs flipping town and taking someone out would look bad on other people.

Anyways im not saying that you are wrong for thinking that the simple solution might very well be the correct one. You could be absolutely correct.

Trying to predict what scum would and wouldnt do remains dangerous here in my eyes.

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7975 Post by Vecna » Mon May 11, 2020 6:41 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:22 pm
Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 4:30 pm
I cannot continue being wrong.
Unless
you
are
doing
it
on
purpose
I mean, this goes without saying right? Youre just going to have to try and get an accurate read on me

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 34480
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7976 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon May 11, 2020 6:49 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:32 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 6:20 pm
Vecna wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:28 pm
Remind me, does a strongman generally kill JAILKEPT targets?
Yes. Strongman can usually get past Jailor.
You certain about this?
I am certain that it is the normal adjudication for the role, yes. I cannot be certain that Worcej is applying it normally, if indeed a Strongman exists at all, because this is a closed setup and Worcej has clearly been fiddling with the roles - for example Brainbomb being a doctor that could repeatedly protect the same person.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14307
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7977 Post by Chaqa » Mon May 11, 2020 7:15 pm

I would strongly recommend everyone crumb all their information at EoN.

I would note I plan on doing this, and some of my QT members are being strongly opposed to it, which I find extremely anti-town and suspicious. The Tem flip has made me realize I need to stick to my guns and stop being influenced by others so much.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 34480
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7978 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon May 11, 2020 7:16 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 7:15 pm
I would strongly recommend everyone crumb all their information at EoN.

I would note I plan on doing this, and some of my QT members are being strongly opposed to it, which I find extremely anti-town and suspicious. The Tem flip has made me realize I need to stick to my guns and stop being influenced by others so much.
"Crumb" or "blurt out"?

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14307
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7979 Post by Chaqa » Mon May 11, 2020 7:17 pm

Crumb is the wrong word here I suppose. Reveal is what I mean.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14307
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: M55: The Last Party - Game Thread

#7980 Post by Chaqa » Mon May 11, 2020 7:17 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 7:16 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 7:15 pm
I would strongly recommend everyone crumb all their information at EoN.

I would note I plan on doing this, and some of my QT members are being strongly opposed to it, which I find extremely anti-town and suspicious. The Tem flip has made me realize I need to stick to my guns and stop being influenced by others so much.
"Crumb" or "blurt out"?
I'm planning on outing every single piece of information I know.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat