JF1981
Macca573
TheFlyingBoat
TheRealCottonmouth
Or at least their first game here.
#681 Post by xorxes » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:18 pm
JF1981
#682 Post by damo666 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:19 pm
I thnk he was just seeking some ratinale behind the massclaim concept and he found this convincing.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:11 pmIt's weird that macca was hooked by this, because his mantra has been being paranoid of people with "knowledge".
#683 Post by xorxes » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:21 pm
Still contradictory. If the massclaim benefits scum, then it clearly does not break the game.worcej wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:03 pmHow is it contradictory?xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 2:57 pmNot sure if you think being obnoxious makes you look more towny.
I'm still not sure if you think the massclaim is bad because it "breaks the game" (makes the game too easy for town), or whether it is bad because it makes the game easier for scum. You have argued both sides of that, which is contradictory.
It breaks the game because we start just picking people out of piles. The game is deduction and investigation. You may think that continues, but just looking at one group at a time and swapping back and forth is dumb.
It helps the scum because it highlights a perfect group for them to kill in and allows the scum to make themselves look better by focusing on specific players and not have to focus on others.
#684 Post by damo666 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:21 pm
Well, I think Bozo is town. Take a look at the voters on the Bozo wagon and the VT claimants. I think we are gonna whittle this down very quickly.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:03 pmHe has certainly pushed for the massclaim, which gives him townie points in my eyes. There was one game in which a massclaim was the obvious thing to do, he didn't push for it, I did not make the effort for some reason either but I later repented not doing it, and he turned out to be scum. Not conclusive, but leaning town.
#685 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:23 pm
Maybe N1 depending on how many scum claim PRs, before any PRs are NKed, but at EOD so the PRs can get their actions in. It does not look like this will be necessary, though, despite your efforts to get scum to claim PR.worcej wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 2:59 pmWhy would you want to allow the scum to coordinate their PR claims?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:39 amI believe the mass claim benefits town if the scum choose to do that. However, we do not need to do the full mass claim immediately, certainly not D1. Maybe N1 if more than 1 scum claim PR.BobMcBob wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:05 amIn terms of horrible numbers, what really stuck out to me was bozo saying that if we had more than 8 PR claims we should get all the PRs to claim roles so that we can root out mafia. I cannot see any way that getting 1 or 2 mafia into a group of three to lynch from while simultaneously revealing exactly where to hit to nullify our best PR actions is a good thing. Not only that, he thought that (assuming one scum claimed Medic and one claimed cool guy) that a 1/3 chance of lynching correctly out of a pool of 2 PRs and one scum was a good deal. I can see no way town benefits from that. And I don't think bozo is stupid enough to mess up the numbers that badly.
If you don't want them to coordinate the piles on D1, you would need them to not coordinate the claims for roles.
You are so obviously scum.
#686 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:26 pm
I mean, say someone is scum and Squigs is assigning pairs by randomization - the options for pairs are the following:
#687 Post by Vecna » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:26 pm
Because scum can pool their knowledge together during the night from what they learned in all buddy chats and come up with a coordinated plan on what to claim?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:17 pmWhy?Vecna wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 9:29 amThis is a horrible statementbozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:39 am
I believe the mass claim benefits town if the scum choose to do that. However, we do not need to do the full mass claim immediately, certainly not D1. Maybe N1 if more than 1 scum claim PR.
#688 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:26 pm
#689 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:27 pm
Your opinion on contradiction is noted and received.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:21 pmStill contradictory. If the massclaim benefits scum, then it clearly does not break the game.worcej wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:03 pmHow is it contradictory?xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 2:57 pm
Not sure if you think being obnoxious makes you look more towny.
I'm still not sure if you think the massclaim is bad because it "breaks the game" (makes the game too easy for town), or whether it is bad because it makes the game easier for scum. You have argued both sides of that, which is contradictory.
It breaks the game because we start just picking people out of piles. The game is deduction and investigation. You may think that continues, but just looking at one group at a time and swapping back and forth is dumb.
It helps the scum because it highlights a perfect group for them to kill in and allows the scum to make themselves look better by focusing on specific players and not have to focus on others.
#690 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:27 pm
It looks like they are going to have 0 or 1 PR claims to coordinate, though.Vecna wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:26 pmBecause scum can pool their knowledge together during the night from what they learned in all buddy chats and come up with a coordinated plan on what to claim?
duh?
#691 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:28 pm
So why did you use meaningless math to try to convince someone?
#692 Post by Chaqa » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:29 pm
Another fucking massclaim game?summit_fever wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:07 pm3 more players to complete the VT/PR massclaim. Worcej refusing until all others have claimed. Thereal is MIA. You're the third.
#693 Post by Vecna » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:30 pm
The math is slightly more complicated because one scum could also be left out of buddy chats entirely. If you assume all scum got into buddychats, the order is irrelevant, and the odds of at least one s-s pairing is 68%worcej wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:26 pmI mean, say someone is scum and Squigs is assigning pairs by randomization - the options for pairs are the following:
S-S: 4/17 - 23.5%
S-T: 13/17 - 76.5%
As pairs "pair up", the odds get better for S-S get better because a T-T pair reduces the pool by 2 for either side, but scum still stay available.
Lets say the first pair was a T-T, then the options for a scum player's pair are now:
S-S: 4/15 - 26.7%
S-T: 11/15 - 73.3%
Say they draw a S-T, then another T-T is drawn. Next scum's pair chances are:
S-S: 3/11 - 27.3%
S-T: 8/11 - 72.7%
I could keep going but I think you see my point.
#694 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:34 pm
If only you were here early enough to try to speak out against it.Chaqa wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:29 pmAnother fucking massclaim game?summit_fever wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:07 pm3 more players to complete the VT/PR massclaim. Worcej refusing until all others have claimed. Thereal is MIA. You're the third.
Why do we even bother playing mafia if we’re gonna do this every time
#695 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:35 pm
I should've taken statistics in college instead of advanced calculus honestly. I use simple stats a lot in work, but thank god for Minitab!Vecna wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:30 pmThe math is slightly more complicated because one scum could also be left out of buddy chats entirely. If you assume all scum got into buddychats, the order is irrelevant, and the odds of at least one s-s pairing is 68%worcej wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:26 pmI mean, say someone is scum and Squigs is assigning pairs by randomization - the options for pairs are the following:
S-S: 4/17 - 23.5%
S-T: 13/17 - 76.5%
As pairs "pair up", the odds get better for S-S get better because a T-T pair reduces the pool by 2 for either side, but scum still stay available.
Lets say the first pair was a T-T, then the options for a scum player's pair are now:
S-S: 4/15 - 26.7%
S-T: 11/15 - 73.3%
Say they draw a S-T, then another T-T is drawn. Next scum's pair chances are:
S-S: 3/11 - 27.3%
S-T: 8/11 - 72.7%
I could keep going but I think you see my point.
#696 Post by xorxes » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:35 pm
You think they're trying to save worcej?damo666 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:21 pmWell, I think Bozo is town. Take a look at the voters on the Bozo wagon and the VT claimants. I think we are gonna whittle this down very quickly.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:03 pmHe has certainly pushed for the massclaim, which gives him townie points in my eyes. There was one game in which a massclaim was the obvious thing to do, he didn't push for it, I did not make the effort for some reason either but I later repented not doing it, and he turned out to be scum. Not conclusive, but leaning town.
#699 Post by Durga » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:39 pm
Is worcej's scum game so aggressive?xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:35 pmYou think they're trying to save worcej?damo666 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:21 pmWell, I think Bozo is town. Take a look at the voters on the Bozo wagon and the VT claimants. I think we are gonna whittle this down very quickly.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:03 pm
He has certainly pushed for the massclaim, which gives him townie points in my eyes. There was one game in which a massclaim was the obvious thing to do, he didn't push for it, I did not make the effort for some reason either but I later repented not doing it, and he turned out to be scum. Not conclusive, but leaning town.
#700 Post by damo666 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:39 pm
The probability of at least one scum pair is 56.6% and 43.4% no scum pairs. I have allowed for the possibility that a scum may be unbuddied.Vecna wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:30 pmThe math is slightly more complicated because one scum could also be left out of buddy chats entirely. If you assume all scum got into buddychats, the order is irrelevant, and the odds of at least one s-s pairing is 68%worcej wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 4:26 pmI mean, say someone is scum and Squigs is assigning pairs by randomization - the options for pairs are the following:
S-S: 4/17 - 23.5%
S-T: 13/17 - 76.5%
As pairs "pair up", the odds get better for S-S get better because a T-T pair reduces the pool by 2 for either side, but scum still stay available.
Lets say the first pair was a T-T, then the options for a scum player's pair are now:
S-S: 4/15 - 26.7%
S-T: 11/15 - 73.3%
Say they draw a S-T, then another T-T is drawn. Next scum's pair chances are:
S-S: 3/11 - 27.3%
S-T: 8/11 - 72.7%
I could keep going but I think you see my point.
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], han-shahanshah