when you say this, what are you looking for
M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:41 am
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
I do find it substantially weird that Blamp (who has towned me) used my wagon as an apparent way to save his own skin.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 8:38 pmCan we please not vote for someone that BusinessLamp and Fluminator want to DK and hammer BusinessLamp or Fluminator today?
Isn't it obvious why BusinessLamp and Fluminator were the last 2 to vote?
Fluminator at least has provided an analysis to justify having his vote.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Honestly, and I know we've hashed this out, I think ghug was legit mad/angry and subbed out because of that. It's entirely NAI and should be viewed that way.Chaqa wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 8:52 pmI’m unsure about Flum.
I don’t think ghug would sub out as scum.
But I also don’t feel he ever adequately responded to PE’s case on him.
Flum has been back and forth in head.
I’m basically at a point where I can see any of the ones I listed as scum, but I don’t feel strongly enough bout it to have a strong preference. My townreads are mostly more certain
It doesn't change the fact ghug's play was boarderline scummy to begin with and is worth flipping now. I commented early on that he normally picked at people's takes and reads and was noticeably doing that less this time around IMHO.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
How did your read evolve though? I see no evolution of thought from you before voting me.BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 8:59 pmIt’s almost like reads can evolve and change as new information is presented
-
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:41 am
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
not what I was referring to. I was responding to bozo talking about flum being on my scum listworcej wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 11:42 pmHow did your read evolve though? I see no evolution of thought from you before voting me.BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 8:59 pmIt’s almost like reads can evolve and change as new information is presented
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
First - I would never follow anyone's instructions, especially celaph or TFB's since I consider myself better than them (and yes, this me being an egotistical person here)BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:03 pmAnyway, if worcej does turn out to be mafia, I’m ascribing my initial misread of him to the fact that during the night one scum meeting, they would’ve taken advantage of the fact that worcej was completely separate from everything due to not posting night one. So when he comes into day two, he’s under instruction to do everything he can to not be dragged into the mess of TFB/celaph. so it kinda makes sense why I’d see him as reasonable townie— he doesn’t really have to use any sense of artiface. So when looking at his iso we should look for unreasonable confidence on celaph, and lack of interactions with them in general.
Second - There was no unreasonable confidence in my read, it was entirely based on finding information to move forward and that's presented here:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Yes, due to VCA you were in the top of my scum possibility because your vote for Kak on D1 was a deciding vote in the final moments. You were also equally tied with Jamie and Sabi.BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:31 pmthis post is interesting. right before this post, worcej says he likes two of my takes, but then still has me as highest scum possibility. he only ever pushes celaph as an "info flip," something which isn't likely to rally people, but still allows him to be on the wagon and look good if celaph is voted. In both this post and his long post (which Flum quoted earlier today) where he analyzes the end of day, it's implied that he's going to push for bozo/me/Jamie as the next votes for "trying to save celaph."worcej wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 5:04 pma) Jamie/Blamp/Sabi > Maniac > TFB >>>> bozo in likelihood to be scum.
b) Chaqa/Demon become hard-lock town for me. BB gets a stronge town read.
I assume you mean flip for c and d? I'll proceed with that:
c) Sabi looks the worst and comes off as trying to save teammate. Maniac/Demon/Chaqa look bad, but there is easier town logic to justify their moves.
d) I don't see anything gained by a town flip of TFB.
Anyways, ##vote celaph
i'm definitely like, going into this iso seeing if the worcej scum narrative makes sense, so take it with a grain of salt, but it does make sense to me as a story.
Remember I had an exchange with Jamie?
This also applied to you because you said this with 02:10 left on D1:worcej wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 5:07 pmThat you potentially saved him D1. I don't easily see why you would've picked Kak over him when untieing the vote.
It doesn't auto-lock you as scum, but it makes the potential much higher.
Yet you voted him right at end of day under the guise of stopping a tie. What makes this worse is you had this post less than 2 hours before EOD:BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:50 pmim hesitant to vote kak because i remember his scum behavior last game seemed really off to me, at least from the omniscient view of the god thread.
his day one has been lazy for sure but other than that his one post of substance wasnt scummy
So why did you not go to celaph when you could prevent a tie by voting him?BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 8:11 pmi think im
chaqa>celaph>demon
at this point. debating first two
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
That's your opinion - literally I've stated my reasoning already that isn't this but if you don't believe me then wtf can I do?BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:33 pmi also do think worcej's reaction to pressure today was more of being upset for being voted for for reasons he shouldn't be caught for, rather than being upset for being incorrectly voted for.
idk how to better articulate that or substantiate that
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Interesting take that Blamp voted me, got asked to explain why, and then finally does.
Yeah - let's keep the guy who cares more about living around. That's always in the best interest of town right?
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
To clear the air here - Bob addressed it publicly already:Fluminator wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:43 pmOk my first post into the worcej reread and I'm already suspicious.
But since this goes against the rules to discuss GM communication I can't say anything. So I'll just make this awkward post instead.
He subbed me in without confirming with me if I was available and didn't reach out to me via Discord until N1 had begun. It was in the middle of the weekend and I am not in any Diplomacy games currently so I wasn't actively checking Webdip for any reason.
Scout's honor.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
I mean, yeah that's why the phase is 48 hours long.
But if you all keep wanting to hammer phases and expect people to play this game on your time table, you're going to be disappointed sometimes...
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
This is why I never say never.Chaqa wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:48 pmI know no such thing.BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:46 pmim p sure flum is town
these people will prob kill me anyway. you know i'm town. it really doesnt matter much unless you think people will keep letting worcej slip by after you're killed
I'm exhausted by every person on the block making emotional appeals and pointing the finger at others, but never the one we want to vote out instead.
You won't vote Flum.
Flum won't vote you.
x won't vote Y
It's all perfectly constructed to ensure we never get a consensus.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
My version:Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:49 pmHere's where I'm at:
TOWN
--------------
Jamiet99uk
bozotheclown
Chaqa
brainbomb
pyxxy
BusinessLamp
Bonatogether
rdrivera2005
worcej
DemonRHK
Fluminator
--------------
SCUM
TOWN
--------------
worcej
bozotheclown
Chaqa
Jamiet99uk
pyxxy
rdrivera2005
Bonatogether
brainbomb
DemonRHK
BusinessLamp
Fluminator
--------------
SCUM
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Been over this already...Fluminator wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:50 pmI'm surprised by how active Worcej was during day 2. I could see him being scum and claiming to get busy during the POE phase when it looked like there were originally many other priority targets.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Fucking +1000Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:52 pmLike Chaqa you literally gave Worcej a super hard time over his participation levels, yet Bona gets to drop out of the game for long periods because "he's at school" and that's absolutely fine for you.
I think you're town but your ability to apply double standards is maddening.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
I said I wouldn't make it in time to hammer the phase.BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:59 pmi dont really see the benefit of end-voting. i think discussion is happening still, and i want worcej to respond to stuff. i guess he said he wouldn't though. lame.
but it doesn't seem like momentum is dead or dying to me?
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Chaqa your problem here is that you want people to do what you want and think we're losing momentum because we won't follow your exact drum beat.Chaqa wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 10:00 pmIt will. It's like atrophy, it sets in slowly.BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:59 pmi dont really see the benefit of end-voting. i think discussion is happening still, and i want worcej to respond to stuff. i guess he said he wouldn't though. lame.
but it doesn't seem like momentum is dead or dying to me?
Every two days spent debating the order of X, Y, and Z when we all acknowledge they need to happen is going to make this game stall to a standstill.
You're new so you haven't seen it happen, but it will.
Universally the game atm is in resolving POE and the 3 people up for it are in POE, so wtf is your problem with people discussing about it?
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Considering no one has even done this yet, this comes off like my 2.5 year old crying that she has to have her dinner in the blue plate instead of the purple plate.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
The joke was because sabi voted me and it was an OMGUS from timing, but I had constantly been saying sabi was in my POE and needed to be resolved.Fluminator wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 10:02 pmThis is a bit of a weird vote to make. Hedging it as a semi-joke but sticking with it to the end when it was looking like it would work?
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
I'm going to slightly divert this point to focus on the middle part of that sentence.worcej wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 12:13 amChaqa your problem here is that you want people to do what you want and think we're losing momentum because we won't follow your exact drum beat.
Universally the game atm is in resolving POE and the 3 people up for it are in POE, so wtf is your problem with people discussing about it?
It does seem like we've at least managed to stay fairly consistent to the results of bozo's survey.
One of Businesslamp, Fluminator, and worcej will die today. That is a goal that I think we all agree on?
When I say we, I mean we. Everyone. Speak up if you would not kill any of these three today.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hominidae