webdiplomacy.net

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:19 am**

Is she listed here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor ... lian_women

?

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:44 am**

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:19 am
Is she listed here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor ... lian_women

?

No

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 1:42 pm**

"I think this is the usual but not only way to answer this question"

i. e., she isn't real.

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 2:17 pm**

On any of these pages or on any of the subcategories of these pages?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... ian_people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... ian_people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... m_Wallonia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... iss_people

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 2:48 pm**

JECE wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 2:17 pm
On any of these pages or on any of the subcategories of these pages?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... ian_people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... ian_people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... m_Wallonia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: ... iss_people

No— surprisingly

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 5:11 pm**

So we are on Question 20.

Team - do you think it's worth asking whether real? It's heavily hinted as fictional but we don't actually know that.

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 5:20 pm**

damo666 wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 5:11 pm
So we are on Question 20.

Team - do you think it's worth asking whether real? It's heavily hinted as fictional but we don't actually know that.

I think we know that. Otherwise why claim (in a peculiar way) that there might be some uncertainty about the DOB?

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 5:44 pm**

JECE wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 5:20 pm

damo666 wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 5:11 pm
So we are on Question 20.

Team - do you think it's worth asking whether real? It's heavily hinted as fictional but we don't actually know that.
I think we know that. Otherwise why claim (in a peculiar way) that there might be some uncertainty about the DOB?

OK so assuming a fictional character written or set {1731-18111} who dies what's a good question?

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:26 pm**

Why didn't you tell us she wasn't real in question one?

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:01 pm**

JECE wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:26 pm
Why didn't you tell us she wasn't real in question one?

Because they didn't understand the question. But honestly the question wasn't clear anyways.

Do you answer yes, because the story of the fictional character exists in our space-time continuum?

Or do you answer no, because they are a fictional character, and if they were to even be considered existing, then by force they would have to occupy a different space-time continuum?

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:11 pm**

sweetandcool wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:01 pm

JECE wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:26 pm
Why didn't you tell us she wasn't real in question one?
Because they didn't understand the question. But honestly the question wasn't clear anyways.

Do you answer yes, because the story of the fictional character exists in our space-time continuum?

Or do you answer no, because they are a fictional character, and if they were to even be considered existing, then by force they would have to occupy a different space-time continuum?

We had an argument there and I admit I might have applied a too broad definition at first, but I thought Jamiet‘s not fantastic definition settled that.

Posted: **Fri Jul 14, 2023 11:31 pm**

Hanging Rook wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:11 pm

sweetandcool wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:01 pm

JECE wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:26 pm
Why didn't you tell us she wasn't real in question one?
Because they didn't understand the question. But honestly the question wasn't clear anyways.

Do you answer yes, because the story of the fictional character exists in our space-time continuum?

Or do you answer no, because they are a fictional character, and if they were to even be considered existing, then by force they would have to occupy a different space-time continuum?
We had an argument there and I admit I might have applied a too broad definition at first, but I thought Jamiet‘s not fantastic definition settled that.

Yeah, just replying to JECE. But I'll take this opportunity to explain it clearer:

Asking if someone exists in our space-time continuum is just a fancy way of asking if they were ever part of our dimension's timeline.

Real people occupy our space-time continuum because they were alive and existed at some point.

No matter the setting of the fiction, a fictional character would not exist in our space-time continuum, except as a story/action figure/etc.

The moral here is to just ask questions in an easy to understand manner. But we can definitively say that fictional characters are not part of our space-time continuum

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2023 7:39 am**

Is it a fictional character that first appeared in the period {1731-1811}?

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2023 7:52 am**

damo666 wrote: ↑
Sat Jul 15, 2023 7:39 am
Is it a fictional character that first appeared in the period {1731-1811}?

No

Missquoting Churchill: Ladies and Gentlemen you have run out of questions. No you have to think.

Five total guesses left.

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2023 7:57 am**

sweetandcool wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 11:31 pm

Hanging Rook wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:11 pm

sweetandcool wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:01 pm

Because they didn't understand the question. But honestly the question wasn't clear anyways.

Do you answer yes, because the story of the fictional character exists in our space-time continuum?

Or do you answer no, because they are a fictional character, and if they were to even be considered existing, then by force they would have to occupy a different space-time continuum?
We had an argument there and I admit I might have applied a too broad definition at first, but I thought Jamiet‘s not fantastic definition settled that.
Yeah, just replying to JECE. But I'll take this opportunity to explain it clearer:

Asking if someone exists in our space-time continuum is just a fancy way of asking if they were ever part of our dimension's timeline.

Real people occupy our space-time continuum because they were alive and existed at some point.

No matter the setting of the fiction, a fictional character would not exist in our space-time continuum, except as a story/action figure/etc.

The moral here is to just ask questions in an easy to understand manner. But we can definitively say that fictional characters are not part of our space-time continuum

I saw it more as an mathematical representation irrespective of the actual physics taking place in it.

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:11 pm**

So presumably it is a fictional character that regarless of when written/made was born {1731-1811} and dies and whose first language is romance but not Spanish or Portuguese.

Guess wisely. I haven't a clue.

Or it's a real and there will be a row.

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:21 pm**

Guess: Alcina.

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:36 pm**

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑
Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:21 pm
Guess: Alcina.

No

Posted: **Sun Jul 16, 2023 12:42 am**

It’s likely from an opera, but many Italian operas were set in France/Spain.

Posted: **Sun Jul 16, 2023 12:44 am**

Uh, Floria Tosca?

webdiplomacy.net

XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124

Re: XX Questions -Game 124