WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

[Jamiet99uk]

Can anyone else validate my thinking here?

Will has outright said that he tried to set a reaction test trap for me, based on knowing that the Gambler's Role PM was different to the Gambler rules described in the Setup Document.

How can anyone know there would be a difference between those two things UNLESS THEY ARE SCUM?

Agreed. My vote stays on Will unless he comes up with an explanation. Makes no sense to me.

Its.not.about.if.its.different

If jamie was the gambler and got his role pm, he probably wouldnt check the setup for details on his role

So i tried to say that there was nothing in the setup about what he was talking about just to see if he sort of believed it

You obviously don't know me because I'm not the sort of person that would "just sort of believe you" if the claim you were making (as in this case) could be quickly and easily verified or falsified.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Can anyone else validate my thinking here?

Will has outright said that he tried to set a reaction test trap for me, based on knowing that the Gambler's Role PM was different to the Gambler rules described in the Setup Document.

How can anyone know there would be a difference between those two things UNLESS THEY ARE SCUM?

Agreed. My vote stays on Will unless he comes up with an explanation. Makes no sense to me.

It just seems SO brazen of a thing for Will to do I dont think it makes sense to vote for him for this. I doubt there even IS a difference TBH

Ha lol you dont know me

And if u dont then why offer this

Sus

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Situation:

The Gambler gets a N0 action and not all players have noticed that this is the case.

This information is contained in (a) the Setup Document, and (b) the Gambler's Role PM.

In both (a) and (b) the information is assumed to be word-for-word identical.


The 'Test':

Will noticed that I was aware of the fact that the Gambler gets a N0 action.

Will claims he set up a reaction test, to try to discover whether I read this information in (a) the Setup Document, or (b) the Gambler's Role PM. (Since if the answer is (b), then I am scum).


The flaw in this 'Test':

If the information is EXACTLY THE SAME in both sources, then why would I respond differently to the test in case (b), compared to case (a)??

Will, please explain why Scum!Jamie, who is in possession of the Gambler Role PM, would react totally differently, in your test, to Town!Jamie who has read the EXACT SAME WORDS in the Setup Document.

What was the scum reaction that you were looking for, in the even that your test would have caught me as scum?

Somebody as scum would probably not read the setup for role details when they have a role pm. So i was trying to see if i could trick scum jamie into thinking the thing we were talking about was not in the setup which would get scum panicked. But you responded quickly and accurately so rip.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

I mean like, what, did he expect scum!Jamie to say "No, that's wrong, because I'm scum and my role PM proves that you're mistaken, Will!"..??

Jfc im not gonna explain a 5th time

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Im just gonna forget about it. Jamie can tunnel me all he wants for it but im not explaining it a 5th time

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

ghug and damo are voting out of pure annoyance.

Jamie is voting because he thinks Just is dumb.

Haze is voting because of Just's opening and he's seen no reason to change it?

kotp is voting chaqa because of chaqa's NAI sheeping post

Everyone else is voting Haze for vibes.

Nobody is voting Yoyo despite the weird few posts.

I'm not sure what I make of this.

You describe your own reason for voting as "vibes" ?

(You are one of the Haze voters).

Ooh bunnyyyyyy

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

I was busy yesterday but it appears we have some interesting developments. I’ll catch up during my lunch break

Why do you think there's interesting developments?

Bunnys like

Giving off nervous vibes with these past few posts

Idk how to explain it

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

How did you insert an "Action" into my post?

I used the keyboard on my computer.

OK but *why*?

Change topic from syntax shenanigans to why jamie is lockscum pls

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Can anyone else validate my thinking here?

Will has outright said that he tried to set a reaction test trap for me, based on knowing that the Gambler's Role PM was different to the Gambler rules described in the Setup Document.

How can anyone know there would be a difference between those two things UNLESS THEY ARE SCUM?

...Wow
this is actually very good evidence against will.

Bruh

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Can anyone else validate my thinking here?

Will has outright said that he tried to set a reaction test trap for me, based on knowing that the Gambler's Role PM was different to the Gambler rules described in the Setup Document.

How can anyone know there would be a difference between those two things UNLESS THEY ARE SCUM?

...Wow
this is actually very good evidence against will.

Not necessarily. It's probably enough to make him a wagon, but Jamie is putting a lot of words in Will's mouth here that Will didn't explicitly say.

Literally this

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Agreed. My vote stays on Will unless he comes up with an explanation. Makes no sense to me.

Its.not.about.if.its.different

If jamie was the gambler and got his role pm, he probably wouldnt check the setup for details on his role

So i tried to say that there was nothing in the setup about what he was talking about just to see if he sort of believed it

You obviously don't know me because I'm not the sort of person that would "just sort of believe you" if the claim you were making (as in this case) could be quickly and easily verified or falsified.

Well i didnt know that and might as well give it a try

[Hamilton Brian]

Here's what's interesting to me.

Jamie obviously felt strongly about what Will did to really dig deep into it. Almost to the point where I think Jamie would actually scumread Will for it and vote Will.

Which Jamie did.

However, Jamie thinks that the suspicion around Bunny is stronger than Will issue.

Has Bunny actively contradicted themselves to warrant the scumread? I know what it's like to play this game with a fleeting memory so I can commiserate on that note.

And Bunny will now be lowkey-to-not involved for a good chunk of the weekend.

How often has that come up in Bunny's scum games?

[FlaviusAetius]

Also TWICE now Chaqa has said he is going to catch up on the game and has yet to do so

That isn't true on either count. I got caught up both times.

Im fairly certain I responded to this but I cant find it, you MIGHT have caught up but all you did was come up with sheeping responses

[damo666]

Ok can we retire this reaction test bollocks now please

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Ok can we retire this reaction test bollocks now please

Yes please

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Here's what's interesting to me.

Jamie obviously felt strongly about what Will did to really dig deep into it. Almost to the point where I think Jamie would actually scumread Will for it and vote Will.

Which Jamie did.

However, Jamie thinks that the suspicion around Bunny is stronger than Will issue.

Has Bunny actively contradicted themselves to warrant the scumread? I know what it's like to play this game with a fleeting memory so I can commiserate on that note.

And Bunny will now be lowkey-to-not involved for a good chunk of the weekend.

How often has that come up in Bunny's scum games?

Ah shit yeah this is actually a great point

Jamie usually is the kind of player to latch onto something and some discrepancy in an argument or a strange move

But idk why he voted bunny

Lemme reread

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Here's what's interesting to me.

Jamie obviously felt strongly about what Will did to really dig deep into it. Almost to the point where I think Jamie would actually scumread Will for it and vote Will.

Which Jamie did.

However, Jamie thinks that the suspicion around Bunny is stronger than Will issue.

Has Bunny actively contradicted themselves to warrant the scumread? I know what it's like to play this game with a fleeting memory so I can commiserate on that note.

And Bunny will now be lowkey-to-not involved for a good chunk of the weekend.

How often has that come up in Bunny's scum games?

Ah shit yeah this is actually a great point

Jamie usually is the kind of player to latch onto something and some discrepancy in an argument or a strange move

But idk why he voted bunny

Lemme reread

Actually nevermind his reasoning for voting bunny is pretty valid plus he is awaiting my response on the topic so i dont hold it against him

[Jamiet99uk]

Here's what's interesting to me.

Jamie obviously felt strongly about what Will did to really dig deep into it. Almost to the point where I think Jamie would actually scumread Will for it and vote Will.

Which Jamie did.

However, Jamie thinks that the suspicion around Bunny is stronger than Will issue.

Has Bunny actively contradicted themselves to warrant the scumread? I know what it's like to play this game with a fleeting memory so I can commiserate on that note.

And Bunny will now be lowkey-to-not involved for a good chunk of the weekend.

How often has that come up in Bunny's scum games?

I did vote for Will, but Ghug persuaded me to reconsider.

[ghug]

my flag? This is the flag of the State of Maine! (well...we're voting on changing it officially in a few months)

That's what I meant by the one I saw.

saw where? This is the first ever graphic I put on webdip

Or you mean online or something?

Yes, I saw an article about the vote earlier and thought "whoa, that's Bunny's pictures". But it's not quite.

[ghug]

Bunny says that all the votes on Haze (including his own, apparently) are for "vibes". Yet clearly D&W is not pushing Haze for "vibes", but has been trying to make an actual case (it's a poor case, but it exists).

Earlier, BunnyGo joined the Haze wagon and specifically said that it was because he agreed with D&W's posts about Haze.

But now it's just "vibes".

That seems off to me.

Added to Ghug's earlier point, I am thinking ##Vote Bunny

Mhm and just look at the other posts Bunny has made its been mostly noncontributions this far in and its not like Bunny has been AFK y'know?

Nobody chooses far to emphasize there. Why are you trolling?