webdiplomacy.net

sorry pyxxy

Oh well.

Sorry Pyxxy. Totally wrong.

To paraphrase Bo, I'm not very good at this game.

pyxxy wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 10:58 pm

This is pretty clearly TvT wagons.

bozo admitting that a tie benefits himself?

My gut read remains that BunnyGo is using the D1 DK from last game as an excuse to openly shade me and push my wagon all day. He'll flip scum tomorrow, I guarantee it.

Posts like these always make me more committed to seeing the kill occur than regret it, though at least it's more information than what was presented before.

Sorry pyxxy.

That was a pretty calm EOD, nobody seemed to fussed.

BunnyGo wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:09 pm

Sorry pyxxy.

That was a pretty calm EOD, nobody seemed to fussed.

Quantity and quality of players in the game imho

Can I make the jump in logic that...all participants on the pyxxy wagon were town? Without going back over the vote movement, pyxxy wagon formed rather earlyish(?) and others developed around it.

There wasn't really another wagon that was in danger, making it easier for mafia to just hang out and watch it all happen?

Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:16 pm

Can I make the jump in logic that...all participants on the pyxxy wagon were town? Without going back over the vote movement, pyxxy wagon formed rather earlyish(?) and others developed around it.

There wasn't really another wagon that was in danger, making it easier for mafia to just hang out and watch it all happen?

I don't follow your logic. Can you explain more?

Are you arguing that you think it is likely that everyone on the pyxxy wagon is Town? Or are you arguing that a person being on the pyxxy wagon makes it more likely that they are Town.

I disagree with both, but I don't follow your argument.

Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:16 pm

Can I make the jump in logic that...all participants on the pyxxy wagon were town? Without going back over the vote movement, pyxxy wagon formed rather earlyish(?) and others developed around it.

There wasn't really another wagon that was in danger, making it easier for mafia to just hang out and watch it all happen?

I don't follow the logic you're employing here to reach this conclusion.

Balki Bartokomous wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:21 pm

Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:16 pm

Can I make the jump in logic that...all participants on the pyxxy wagon were town? Without going back over the vote movement, pyxxy wagon formed rather earlyish(?) and others developed around it.

There wasn't really another wagon that was in danger, making it easier for mafia to just hang out and watch it all happen?

I don't follow your logic. Can you explain more?

Are you arguing that you think it is likely that everyone on the pyxxy wagon is Town? Or are you arguing that a person being on the pyxxy wagon makes it more likely that they are Town. Kind of one and the same, no? Anyway my thought process was your first question, and I've tried explaining below

I disagree with both, but I don't follow your argument.

No, I need to recant that because I've changed my mind upon a closer look from around the 5 hour mark. I originally thought, and see if you can follow this:
a) there weren't really any competitive wagons (mafia wagon wasn't in danger)
b) as a result, there was little need for mafia to move off of any wagons they were on looking at the number of town on the wagon.

But that's a bad assumption. Looking at how the votes moved make me take that comment back. Of the five that are on there, there is only ONE confirmed town that I know completely for a fact. The other 4? :shrug: I want to take a look at how things moved over the last one to two hours.

worcej wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:32 pm

I don't follow the logic you're employing here to reach this conclusion.
[/quote]

Never mind; explained in the reply to Balki.

Balki, sorry...I messed up the reply function and tried replying directly in bold within your qupte.

I feel like we should revisit worcej in the future

Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:37 pm

Balki, sorry...I messed up the reply function and tried replying directly in bold within your qupte.

Thanks for your response.

Chaqa wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:43 pm

I feel like we should revisit worcej in the future

I think you're 100% correct.

I still think ghug's assessment on pyxxy was flawed but more about that later.

I just now caught the "Chaqa J has been consistently..."

In the forum, with my failing eyes it really looked like the letter I. And someone else used one of those letters. Just caught it on the bot.

Chaqa wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:43 pm

I feel like we should revisit worcej in the future

Is this simply because I am making fun of you for last game? Because your participation in this game has almost exclusively been to just kill me.

Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:56 pm

I still think ghug's assessment on pyxxy was flawed but more about that later.

I just now caught the "Chaqa J has been consistently..."

In the forum, with my failing eyes it really looked like the letter I. And someone else used one of those letters. Just caught it on the bot.

He was making fun of the typo in Chaqa's post that he clearly must've edited or put more effort into than flying from the cuff or being natural.

And to be clear, I welcome scrutiny that has substance that I can discuss back against for votes on me - but none of the casters on me from D1 (Chaqa, ghug, or lfischl) have any meat to chew on or even taste.

ghug makes sense to be meatless.

Chaqa is clearly scum for forsaking meat.

and lfischl is just swimming along without a head like that one viral video of the headless pleco