MAFIA 49 -Avengers "Re-release"- GAME THREAD [HIDDEN]

[Jamiet99uk]

Maniac was browsing the thread here and there after EoN, he’s lurking because he’s caught and I am not voting for anyone else next phase.

Is this still your intention?

[Jamiet99uk]

I miscalculated... thinking (despite knowing better) that I could pass it off.

SO town needs to know that scum will have the mind stone.

I have wracked my brain to figure out how to get out of this ditch... but despite Kalel's plan (which I sorta spoke around days ago) I don't see how. That annoying "stone gift is at the end" thing.

I hoped that I could just hide in the corner, and people would not think of the stone passing rule... but I am sure scum have been aware of this even before others have brought it up in here.

So... they either will kill me (and the stone will go to the ninja) or they will thief it (and the stone goes to the IT.)

I don't understand this.

I thought the rule was that you were allowed to hand items off.

Why can't Darg gift the stone to someone else?

Darg have you explained why you used the stone on yourself? You were not at risk of being lynched.

[Jamiet99uk]

Okay I'm kinda caught up.

Answers to my queries would be appreciated.

[rdrivera2005]

Temasek has 8 votes for lurking?

Someone on Tem wagon make a scum case about how Tem's actions are scum motivated.

Temasek seems like a "just because" wagon, which are crap wagons.

Okay this fucking triggers me. I do not like these posts (both from D3) at all.

I am clear Town. When I voted for Temasek, I clearly explained why.

BunnyGo has flipped town. When BunnyGo voted Temasek, it was accompanied by a fully detailed case.

Yet we had both Foodcoats and Foxcastle making statements like the ones above, implying that no case or reasoning on Temasek had been presented. This appears a deliberate attempt to take pressure off Temasek by creating a false narrative.

I would like Foxcastle and Foodcoats to explain this crap.

Jamiet, could you take a look at Fox last day? I keep flip-flopping on my read of him.
He seems to be willing to vote for anyone but Vapor at day start and when Tem get traction he answered the way you quoted and when Nepthys built that convoluted case on Bunny with no questioning. And he started the day saying:

Day-3 34:00
page 168 / orig
↑damo666: "@Fox what scum groupings have you found that work?"
Part of my problem is that I keep/kept coming back to Sulit/Kitsune/Yuuki (RIP)/Kalel, and was a little worried that I was just tunneling on people I didn't know. Maniac, Neph, and Dargo also make me twitch.

Rdrivera is kinda a big question, but leaning town for now.

I'm pretty sure BunnyGo is town, I think Chaqa is probably town.

Bunny is sure town and no mention to Vapor.

[rdrivera2005]

I miscalculated... thinking (despite knowing better) that I could pass it off.

SO town needs to know that scum will have the mind stone.

I have wracked my brain to figure out how to get out of this ditch... but despite Kalel's plan (which I sorta spoke around days ago) I don't see how. That annoying "stone gift is at the end" thing.

I hoped that I could just hide in the corner, and people would not think of the stone passing rule... but I am sure scum have been aware of this even before others have brought it up in here.

So... they either will kill me (and the stone will go to the ninja) or they will thief it (and the stone goes to the IT.)

I don't understand this.

I thought the rule was that you were allowed to hand items off.

Why can't Darg gift the stone to someone else?

Darg have you explained why you used the stone on yourself? You were not at risk of being lynched.

He can gift the stone but it's processed as last action at EOD/EON which means that if he is killed or visited by thief he loses the stone before handing it.

[foodcoats]

Temasek has 8 votes for lurking?

Someone on Tem wagon make a scum case about how Tem's actions are scum motivated.

Temasek seems like a "just because" wagon, which are crap wagons.

Okay this fucking triggers me. I do not like these posts (both from D3) at all.

I am clear Town. When I voted for Temasek, I clearly explained why.

BunnyGo has flipped town. When BunnyGo voted Temasek, it was accompanied by a fully detailed case.

Yet we had both Foodcoats and Foxcastle making statements like the ones above, implying that no case or reasoning on Temasek had been presented. This appears a deliberate attempt to take pressure off Temasek by creating a false narrative.

I would like Foxcastle and Foodcoats to explain this crap.

Sometimes when i'm saucy i exaggerate but essentially i thought the case on tem was weak, tem was a better investigative target than lynch, and i had reread part of tem's D1 and did not believe scumtem would've played so.

[foodcoats]

And i had said those things in thread previously.

[foodcoats]

While i'm here

Look at vaporwave's voting yesterday

And tell me vape didn't know when to expect day end

[Jamiet99uk]

Temasek has 8 votes for lurking?

Someone on Tem wagon make a scum case about how Tem's actions are scum motivated.

Temasek seems like a "just because" wagon, which are crap wagons.

Okay this fucking triggers me. I do not like these posts (both from D3) at all.

I am clear Town. When I voted for Temasek, I clearly explained why.

BunnyGo has flipped town. When BunnyGo voted Temasek, it was accompanied by a fully detailed case.

Yet we had both Foodcoats and Foxcastle making statements like the ones above, implying that no case or reasoning on Temasek had been presented. This appears a deliberate attempt to take pressure off Temasek by creating a false narrative.

I would like Foxcastle and Foodcoats to explain this crap.

Sometimes when i'm saucy i exaggerate but essentially i thought the case on tem was weak, tem was a better investigative target than lynch, and i had reread part of tem's D1 and did not believe scumtem would've played so.

This is a piss poor response.

Nope. Not accepting this.

You didn't say the case was weak, you claimed the case was based on an accusation that Temasek was lurking.

Lurking was not the basis of the case against Temasek.

You are a bad liar.

[Jamiet99uk]

Silence descends.

My scumpool:

Foodcoats
Vapourwave
Nephthys
Foxcastle

I am sure there are at least two scum in this group.

Then:

Maybe KalelChase
Maybe Temasek
Maybe Maniac

[Chaqa]

So you agreed to this deal, and I will be HAPPY to lynch you when day dawns.

And then we've lost a third town at your hands... No way we lynch Neph tomorrow.

Tell me in less than 500 words how Neph is a townclear?

I never said he was a town clear, but he is much more likely to be town than other scum candidates, and he is 100% NOT the SK. Therefore, we should NOT vote for him yet.

[Jamiet99uk]

Maniac was browsing the thread here and there after EoN, he’s lurking because he’s caught and I am not voting for anyone else next phase.

Is this still your intention?

Is this still your intention?
Is this still your intention?
Is this still your intention?

[Vaporwave]

Not sure what to say anymore

[Vaporwave]

This is all too depressing

[Vaporwave]

Neph is a priority tomorrow

ahoy

[foodcoats]

Okay this fucking triggers me. I do not like these posts (both from D3) at all.

I am clear Town. When I voted for Temasek, I clearly explained why.

BunnyGo has flipped town. When BunnyGo voted Temasek, it was accompanied by a fully detailed case.

Yet we had both Foodcoats and Foxcastle making statements like the ones above, implying that no case or reasoning on Temasek had been presented. This appears a deliberate attempt to take pressure off Temasek by creating a false narrative.

I would like Foxcastle and Foodcoats to explain this crap.

Sometimes when i'm saucy i exaggerate but essentially i thought the case on tem was weak, tem was a better investigative target than lynch, and i had reread part of tem's D1 and did not believe scumtem would've played so.

This is a piss poor response.

Nope. Not accepting this.

You didn't say the case was weak, you claimed the case was based on an accusation that Temasek was lurking.

Lurking was not the basis of the case against Temasek.

You are a bad liar.

Heh. It's cause I'm town and I'm not revising all my posts three times.

[Jamiet99uk]

This is a piss poor response.

Nope. Not accepting this.

You didn't say the case was weak, you claimed the case was based on an accusation that Temasek was lurking.

Lurking was not the basis of the case against Temasek.

You are a bad liar.

Heh. It's cause I'm town and I'm not revising all my posts three times.

Revising your posts? I'm not sure what you mean by that.

The important takeaway here is that I have exposed a clear example of you lying, like a lying liar who tells lies.

[foodcoats]

This is a piss poor response.

Nope. Not accepting this.

You didn't say the case was weak, you claimed the case was based on an accusation that Temasek was lurking.

Lurking was not the basis of the case against Temasek.

You are a bad liar.

Heh. It's cause I'm town and I'm not revising all my posts three times.

Revising your posts? I'm not sure what you mean by that.

The important takeaway here is that I have exposed a clear example of you lying, like a lying liar who tells lies.

You explained your reason about the Temasek vote after I made that jab I believe, but not everyone did. And I would still argue that the Tem wagon largely existed as a consequence of Tem's lurking, and that it grew to - that it was possible to grow to - 8 votes because of that. I wasn't literally saying "All 8 players have claimed the only reason they are voting is due to Temasek's low contribution" and I don't know why you would think that. I was not convinced Temasek was scum and wanted to test the people on it.

[Jamiet99uk]

I suppose either me or Darg will be killed tonight.

I'm about to go to bed. EoN will occur while I sleep.

Make sure Foodcosts is a wagon tomorrow.

Foxcastle, Neph, and Vapor are also more likely to be scum than not.

Maniac and Temasek are not clear.

Good luck.

[foodcoats]

Neph is a priority tomorrow

ahoy

y tho