MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

[Chaqa]

Possible Reaver Press thing:

the @ symbol - Temasek has only used it once, and i was between pages 27 and 32. Possibly minimal, but he used it on average ~5 times per game previously according to my quick search

Still reading through Tem's posts.

[Chaqa]

So you say tem is RP, but are advocating to *not* lynch them straight away?

Again, BH can win with town. I'll tell you tem is not a bounty, so I won't go up to 2 collected. I'll still be safe.

Why would we lynch him?

If we roleblock him, he's shut down.

So you say tem is RP, but are advocating to *not* lynch them straight away?

Again, BH can win with town. I'll tell you tem is not a bounty, so I won't go up to 2 collected. I'll still be safe.

Why would we lynch him?

If we roleblock him, he's shut down.

Correct. We roleblock him and lynch in goldie/Fox/Chaqa.

... Why lynch me? Goldie I get.

I'm almost certain Tem would have been recruiting in the PRs, aren't you?

[damo666]

So you say tem is RP, but are advocating to *not* lynch them straight away?

Again, BH can win with town. I'll tell you tem is not a bounty, so I won't go up to 2 collected. I'll still be safe.

Why would we lynch him?

If we roleblock him, he's shut down.

So you say tem is RP, but are advocating to *not* lynch them straight away?

Again, BH can win with town. I'll tell you tem is not a bounty, so I won't go up to 2 collected. I'll still be safe.

Why would we lynch him?

If we roleblock him, he's shut down.

Correct. We roleblock him and lynch in goldie/Fox/Chaqa.

Agreed. However, lynching Fox or Chaqa before Goldie is an unnecessary risk.

[xorxes]

Why would we lynch him?

If we roleblock him, he's shut down.

Why would we lynch him?

If we roleblock him, he's shut down.

Correct. We roleblock him and lynch in goldie/Fox/Chaqa.

... Why lynch me? Goldie I get.

I'm almost certain Tem would have been recruiting in the PRs, aren't you?

You're still in the Assassin pool.

[Chaqa]

Oh, that's fair.

Damo can sort it out, though, can't he?

Goldie is our next lynch regardless I think.

[xorxes]

Why would we lynch him?

If we roleblock him, he's shut down.

Why would we lynch him?

If we roleblock him, he's shut down.

Correct. We roleblock him and lynch in goldie/Fox/Chaqa.

Agreed. However, lynching Fox or Chaqa before Goldie is an unnecessary risk.

Goldie is probably safest, but we may have more info after EON.

[Chaqa]

I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out what the press rule could be just now. I'm at a loss.

Things I don't think it is:
- mentioning a player's name every post
- using punctuation every post
- anything related to emojis
- related to post count
- related to posting every phase

Things it could be:
- not using the '@' symbol

Reasoning:
Temasek has only used it once:

Just woke up. I find myself siding with gold and ND on this.

@xorx

What's your rationale in not getting the GM to confirm your role if you're actually the captain, there's no Downside.

Will claim once xorx is confirmed.

For the p171 violation, unquoted goldie, teacon, myself, plus quoted Tom+dargo:

@rdrivera - I'm aware the phases are 48 hours long. Hence why its better to put pressure on the people that are here now, not the ones that will show up a few hours before phase end. We won't get any information from leaving our votes parked on them.

And again, we really need more people to speak up on the massclaim. Anything less than 10 PR claims is going to be next to worthless for us, yet invaluable for the scum. Getting a dozen people to claim PR or not PR helps scum because they can hide amongst the PR claims and not get caught. This is an everything or nothing push.

So I'm going to be scrutinizing the people who are currently pushing the mass claim who are *not* xorxes. I still do believe xorxes is town, and have good town reads on teacon and ND as well. emc is looking very suspect though. He has posted the third most out of anyone, but I just looked through each of those posts and the vast, vast majority of them are garbage. He has maybe 3 posts where he's actually considering something seriously, and just plugged a vote onto the silent Vecna. Moreover, he went from being skeptical about the massclaim to a full-blown supporter of it, and started organizing the chart to push people into thinking this was an already agreed-upon thing that we are doing.

And then there's this.

I gotta type up something useful, I feel very spammy lol

I don't like it. ##VOTE EMC

@darg - you're fine. Good reasoning. wtg.

@dr. jamie - wtg!

At what point does it become more valuable to re-scan PRs who are likely Reavers?

i.e. - teacon

Teacon could not have been reavered N1 (directed actions to twin).

If gold is RP, and was roleblocked, teacon could not have been reavered N2 either.

So teacon is one of the less likely to be a Reaver.

Only if Goldie is RP. I think any Reaver worth their salt would have gone after teacon last night -
1. confirmed PR
2. likely to survive long-term
3. unlikely to be doctor saved

If RP isn't goldie, I'm operating on the assumption teacon is a Reaver.

This is why I want to lynch goldie. Kalel's roleblock can help us,and he's spoken to willingness.

@xorx - what about lynching worcej? Dual purpose:
1. Lets Kalel work with us as an additional Roleblock against Reavers (who should also be Mafia 1's biggest threat)
2. Find out who in worcej/goldie is BH (if any)

For the 171-181, there's a few options. Non-quoted, we have goldie and ND:

@xorxes - please see what Bunny posted. He said what I did, just more eloquently. You can't have two level 1 violations with the same person. Their second mistake would be a level 2.

I also highly, highly suspect we're looking at some sort of 24 hr posting requirement. Not things that they cannot say.

Should of lynched Worcej days ago @Cappy Nitwit like I suggested

##VOTE WORCEJ

But tbh I am pretty tuned out atm in general. Not really feelign it. Will do my semi-best thu not 100% thu.

Quote includes Bunny and EMC, both have a few so I won't bother to copy/paste.

Could everyone please post the @ symbol?

Especially: Goldie, Teacon, ND, Temasek

[Chaqa]

To clarify: Temasek posted the @ symbol shortly before the first violation. He has not posted another since. It's not a super-solid hypothesis, but it's something to test while I search for more.

Let's keep adding to the list of ones it could/couldn't be

[damo666]

@ waste of time

[Jamiet99uk]

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

[Chaqa]

@ waste of time

Hey, look, it’s worth a shot

[Chaqa]

I see you lurking, EMC. Care to post it?

[Chaqa]

I see you lurking, EMC. Care to post it?

Teacon was also lurking earlier

[e.m.c^42]

oho

now we have a common thread to hunt down

time to peterbot then

but do suppose there's always tinfoil possibility rPrime is someone else - damo is one recruit, tem is another, actual one is not gf but someone like me or fox or chaq, and this is a beautiful plot to get people to rb someone else so nk's go off lmfao

but that would be an inane plan as I think lynches in order would take out all before NKs get there

[e.m.c^42]

@chaq, have I not posted it in past? don't recall lol

[BunnyGo]

Sorry all, I had a bad reaction to something and will be out of it for the next while. Good find on the RP, will make hypothesis hunting easier. Will be back whenever I feel better.

[damo666]

@ waste of time

Hey, look, it’s worth a shot

I know but I would be amazed. I grant you no harm in trying.

[Chaqa]

@chaq, have I not posted it in past? don't recall lol

Just checking.

[Chaqa]

Sorry all, I had a bad reaction to something and will be out of it for the next while. Good find on the RP, will make hypothesis hunting easier. Will be back whenever I feel better.

Can you post an '@' symbol?

I find this highly suspicious, tbh. Bunny has seemed off all game.

[Chaqa]

@ waste of time

Hey, look, it’s worth a shot

I know but I would be amazed. I grant you no harm in trying.

Fair.