Yes that makes sense.
##Vote No Lynch.
#3801 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:19 pm
Yes that makes sense.
#3802 Post by xorxes » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:19 pm
We can't all vote no-lynch though, we need at least two people voting dargo (or Espresso) and everyone else on singleton wagons.
#3803 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:20 pm
WAITxorxes wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:10 pmYep.
Admittedly, the risk of being nighgtkilled for both of them approached zero, but Espresso didn't even know that damo was the Doc so how would he know that he was under no risk? And dargo is clearly scum, possibly the cow.
I think the clears should nominate one person to vote for dargo and everyone else should vote no-lybch, but that's just my opinion. I don't want to get cow disease.
#3804 Post by Percy Williams » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:20 pm
Actually, the one use cop can't cop until night 5.
#3805 Post by xorxes » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:23 pm
True, so that was not the reason. They had to kill damo at some point though.Percy Williams wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:20 pmActually, the one use cop can't cop until night 5.
#3806 Post by Chaqa » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:24 pm
#3807 Post by bo_sox48 » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:25 pm
This is actually... not a terrible plan lmao
#3808 Post by Chaqa » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:27 pm
#3809 Post by xorxes » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:27 pm
We will have to choose the people most unlikely to be cowed by dargo and make it a reasonably large number so that any shenanigans will cost them more than it benefits them.
#3810 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:30 pm
As counterexamples, in recent games, unvotes were not considered valid to avoid modkill. However: I was having fun. I'm sure the GMs would much prefer we play the game rather than trying to break it.
#3811 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:38 pm
For at least the last 15 games it has been against the rules to end the phase on an "unvote".
#3813 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
That invokes multiple players breaking the "must vote" rule and would be very shitty. I refuse to engage in such nonsense.
#3814 Post by Percy Williams » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:40 pm
#3815 Post by Percy Williams » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:43 pm
He's gotta be scum! He doesn't want to go with a plan that makes Town win!Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pmThat invokes multiple players breaking the "must vote" rule and would be very shitty. I refuse to engage in such nonsense.
#3816 Post by dargorygel » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:52 pm
#3817 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:59 pm
#3818 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:03 pm
I think this is likely, actually. Town speculated (incorrectly) on a similar ploy in M46, and several players from that game are in this one...
#3819 Post by Chaqa » Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:16 pm
#3820 Post by xorxes » Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:25 pm
It's a definite possibility. Ezio effectively used this ploy in one game in which he counterclaimed teammate rivera.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]