M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

[Jamiet99uk]

Now that I've solved the game, it's time to put the kettle on.

[dargorygel]

Now that I've solved the game, it's time to put the kettle on.

Verrry interesting.

One slight correction, that does not change your ultimate conclusion. Apthough perhaps it weakens it a tick. Dip"s line of voting to SAVE is above his statement. He would vote to save himself and straight... not bona, me, damo, and food.

[dargorygel]

Enjoy your kettle of tea... or of moonshine.

[dargorygel]

@dip

Kindly explain your soft info. I got the first one. Tired of playing code games

[dargorygel]

Also, a reminder, the bot IS up

[dargorygel]

Some interesting people watching the thread. DM me if you would like to play some time.

[Jamiet99uk]

Now that I've solved the game, it's time to put the kettle on.

Verrry interesting.

One slight correction, that does not change your ultimate conclusion. Apthough perhaps it weakens it a tick. Dip"s line of voting to SAVE is above his statement. He would vote to save himself and straight... not bona, me, damo, and food.

Hmmm, ok, that wasn't how I read it, but it doesn't actually change things all that much.

He included Ghug in a list of three people that he said he wanted dead.
He did not include Foodcoats in that list. Foodcoats was on the other side of THAT line, I think we can all agree.

Then he had the chance to kill Ghug and instead he saved Ghug.

This is still very strong evidence.

[dargorygel]

Now that I've solved the game, it's time to put the kettle on.

Verrry interesting.

One slight correction, that does not change your ultimate conclusion. Apthough perhaps it weakens it a tick. Dip"s line of voting to SAVE is above his statement. He would vote to save himself and straight... not bona, me, damo, and food.

Hmmm, ok, that wasn't how I read it, but it doesn't actually change things all that much.

He included Ghug in a list of three people that he said he wanted dead.
He did not include Foodcoats in that list. Foodcoats was on the other side of THAT line, I think we can all agree.

Then he had the chance to kill Ghug and instead he saved Ghug.

This is still very strong evidence.

Ive been rethinking dip, too. You might be right, here.

[dargorygel]

Looking forward to his response.

[dargorygel]

Also, ben rethinking my stance on ghug.

His claim that I did not react enough to dip strikes me as odd.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

For the bot:

Foodcoats has died! He was an alliance member!

[StraightFlush]

scummy post

You're calling a flipped town's post scummy. Are you saying this to retroactively justify a scumread on Food, or defend a scummate on the Food wagon?

This post makes me more sus of Dip and especially Darg.

But not you, or ghug. Wadda you call it when you reinforce ideas by cherry picking evidence? There is a word for it.

Ah yes, because it makes plenty of sense to scumread myself after reading my role PM and seeing "alliance member" written plain as day. Also ghug voted for self pres which is entirely NAI.

[ghug]

@Damo:

From your Bozosurvey; which players voted *differently* to their survey response?

Three out of the 4 Food voters {darg, dip, sf} went against there previous declaration.

So did I (ghug=>red) and food (darg=> ghug).

Red (ghug) hadn't made a prior declaration.

Bona was locked in on ghug early.

Only two players stuck with their declaration; ghug on food and Jamie on Dip.

Observations anyone?

This is a bad way of looking at it. Votes change. It's day 1. I briefly went to having food in my bottom half of candidates before moving him back up, but because at two points in time I settled on the same person, I look better?

[damo666]

@Damo:

From your Bozosurvey; which players voted *differently* to their survey response?

Three out of the 4 Food voters {darg, dip, sf} went against there previous declaration.

So did I (ghug=>red) and food (darg=> ghug).

Red (ghug) hadn't made a prior declaration.

Bona was locked in on ghug early.

Only two players stuck with their declaration; ghug on food and Jamie on Dip.

Observations anyone?

This is a bad way of looking at it. Votes change. It's day 1. I briefly went to having food in my bottom half of candidates before moving him back up, but because at two points in time I settled on the same person, I look better?

I didn't make any observations myself. I was merely providing the information Jamie requested.

[dargorygel]

You're calling a flipped town's post scummy. Are you saying this to retroactively justify a scumread on Food, or defend a scummate on the Food wagon?

This post makes me more sus of Dip and especially Darg.

But not you, or ghug. Wadda you call it when you reinforce ideas by cherry picking evidence? There is a word for it.

Ah yes, because it makes plenty of sense to scumread myself after reading my role PM and seeing "alliance member" written plain as day. Also ghug voted for self pres which is entirely NAI.

Fair enough

[dargorygel]

@Damo:

From your Bozosurvey; which players voted *differently* to their survey response?

Three out of the 4 Food voters {darg, dip, sf} went against there previous declaration.

So did I (ghug=>red) and food (darg=> ghug).

Red (ghug) hadn't made a prior declaration.

Bona was locked in on ghug early.

Only two players stuck with their declaration; ghug on food and Jamie on Dip.

Observations anyone?

This is a bad way of looking at it. Votes change. It's day 1. I briefly went to having food in my bottom half of candidates before moving him back up, but because at two points in time I settled on the same person, I look better?

Dis you answer this before or after you read Jamie's case?

[Jamiet99uk]

Looks like Ghug saw my detective work and sneaked away to talk on Discord instead.

[ghug]

Dip&War: "I want Ghug to die today, and Foodcoats must be protected!"

The Vote Count: Ghug (3) vs Foodcoats (3)

Dip&War: "Yikes! Better kill Foodcoats!"

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

He did explain it at the time, didn't he? Or was that damo?

[ghug]

Three out of the 4 Food voters {darg, dip, sf} went against there previous declaration.

So did I (ghug=>red) and food (darg=> ghug).

Red (ghug) hadn't made a prior declaration.

Bona was locked in on ghug early.

Only two players stuck with their declaration; ghug on food and Jamie on Dip.

Observations anyone?

This is a bad way of looking at it. Votes change. It's day 1. I briefly went to having food in my bottom half of candidates before moving him back up, but because at two points in time I settled on the same person, I look better?

Dis you answer this before or after you read Jamie's case?

Before

[ghug]

Looks like Ghug saw my detective work and sneaked away to talk on Discord instead.

Jamie, we've played like a thousands games together. You of all people should be able to tell that my activity levels indicate that I am busy.