WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]

[worcej]

##vote damo

The time has passed and nothing came. I get being busy, but now let’s put some pressure on him to perform when he gets here.

Or - he just OMGUS’s me and votes me for voting him, thus continuing to underperform our expectations

You already voted THRICE you cant vote again

You can vote unlimited times fool

[worcej]

Go read the front page again Flav.

I look forward to your “omg I am a fool for not understanding the game” post

[worcej]

Man, I am cranky this morning lol

[FlaviusAetius]

Well done Mrs Bomb. You tell him.

PS don't worry about the bot, it's irrelevant this game.

Thanks! I’m not gonna just sit back and take it, wasn’t a strategy on my part…. Just a crappy day.

So now when it comes to what we are supposed to be doing…. Is it basically just throw out accusations and see how people behave and then based on history of how they’ve been in previous games, making conclusions accordingly? If so, then I’m suspicious of Flavius just throwing out voting early for no other reason than less than adequate posting (according to him) on Day 1. With that logic, are we just throwing crap at the wall and seeing what sticks? I asked questions, I engaged about the shorthand…. And for someone who doesn’t really know what the heck I’m doing, I don’t know what more can be expected of me?

You’re kinda on point here.

This is a game of deduction and reasoning.

That being said, how do you feel about the fact Flavius is proposing to vote for low content people while he admonished my votes early for will and eden as bad?

WRONG I actually advocated for a ONE early vote. Very specifically I did not advocate for three early votes, you are the one who did that and that is what made you scummy(not just this BTW!)

[worcej]

Thanks! I’m not gonna just sit back and take it, wasn’t a strategy on my part…. Just a crappy day.

So now when it comes to what we are supposed to be doing…. Is it basically just throw out accusations and see how people behave and then based on history of how they’ve been in previous games, making conclusions accordingly? If so, then I’m suspicious of Flavius just throwing out voting early for no other reason than less than adequate posting (according to him) on Day 1. With that logic, are we just throwing crap at the wall and seeing what sticks? I asked questions, I engaged about the shorthand…. And for someone who doesn’t really know what the heck I’m doing, I don’t know what more can be expected of me?

You’re kinda on point here.

This is a game of deduction and reasoning.

That being said, how do you feel about the fact Flavius is proposing to vote for low content people while he admonished my votes early for will and eden as bad?

WRONG I actually advocated for a ONE early vote. Very specifically I did not advocate for three early votes, you are the one who did that and that is what made you scummy(not just this BTW!)

How does voting early make someone more scummy?

Explain it for the class like we are dumb

[FlaviusAetius]

Go read the front page again Flav.

I look forward to your “omg I am a fool for not understanding the game” post

Im being gaslit
4. Persistent Votes:
Once you have voted for someone, your vote stays on them for the rest of the current Day phase, but as per (3) you can add your vote to other wagons too. Voting "unvote" is not allowed.

You are wrong here worcej

[worcej]

Go read the front page again Flav.

I look forward to your “omg I am a fool for not understanding the game” post

Im being gaslit
4. Persistent Votes:
Once you have voted for someone, your vote stays on them for the rest of the current Day phase, but as per (3) you can add your vote to other wagons too. Voting "unvote" is not allowed.

You are wrong here worcej

LOLOLOLOL

That (3) is referring to rule 3 dude.

[FlaviusAetius]

You’re kinda on point here.

This is a game of deduction and reasoning.

That being said, how do you feel about the fact Flavius is proposing to vote for low content people while he admonished my votes early for will and eden as bad?

WRONG I actually advocated for a ONE early vote. Very specifically I did not advocate for three early votes, you are the one who did that and that is what made you scummy(not just this BTW!)

How does voting early make someone more scummy?

Explain it for the class like we are dumb

Because it LOCKS in, you can now sit back and harp on three very specific people and not have to shut your blinders off. You are coasting now and this is like the fourth time I alone have explaiend why

[worcej]

3. Unlimited Votes:
Each player may vote for as many players they wish (up to one vote per suspect), and for "No Kill". These votes count simultaneously.

[worcej]

Flavius,

Seriously your thoughts that I am coasting and that I am no longer able to vote are a hilariously bad misunderstanding and indicative of fundamentally not understanding the setup.

You owe me an apology for saying I am playing bad now

[worcej]

##call GM

Can you give us a vote count to confirm the game for Flavius?

[FlaviusAetius]

Go read the front page again Flav.

I look forward to your “omg I am a fool for not understanding the game” post

Im being gaslit
4. Persistent Votes:
Once you have voted for someone, your vote stays on them for the rest of the current Day phase, but as per (3) you can add your vote to other wagons too. Voting "unvote" is not allowed.

You are wrong here worcej

LOLOLOLOL

That (3) is referring to rule 3 dude.

Ok well I guess we are both wrong. Early voting still means you cant undo your vote and it parks it, making you have to advocate for that person. HOWEVER, its true you dont just have three votes TOTAL

[FlaviusAetius]

Flavius,

Seriously your thoughts that I am coasting and that I am no longer able to vote are a hilariously bad misunderstanding and indicative of fundamentally not understanding the setup.

You owe me an apology for saying I am playing bad now

Ok but like its still a pretty bad move to vote early like that, ok its not AS BAD as I thought but still not GREAT

[worcej]

Im being gaslit
4. Persistent Votes:
Once you have voted for someone, your vote stays on them for the rest of the current Day phase, but as per (3) you can add your vote to other wagons too. Voting "unvote" is not allowed.

You are wrong here worcej

LOLOLOLOL

That (3) is referring to rule 3 dude.

Ok well I guess we are both wrong. Early voting still means you cant undo your vote and it parks it, making you have to advocate for that person. HOWEVER, its true you dont just have three votes TOTAL

I am not wrong - I knew my votes stuck after placing them.

I don’t feel bad about voting anyone here as every vote changes the “puzzle” for scum and forces action. Sitting around and just saying you think people are scummy and not exercising your power plays into the scum’s game here.

Also - YOU HAVE YET TO EXPLAIN WHY ME VOTING EARLY IS SCUMMY!!!!

[worcej]

Flavius,

Seriously your thoughts that I am coasting and that I am no longer able to vote are a hilariously bad misunderstanding and indicative of fundamentally not understanding the setup.

You owe me an apology for saying I am playing bad now

Ok but like its still a pretty bad move to vote early like that, ok its not AS BAD as I thought but still not GREAT

Bad does not equal scummy.

And, take this from me (who you think is smart): You have done nothing but laser focus on me, so if the slim chance you actually are town, you are playing far more badly than me, who has 4 actual scum reads and votes in place.

[FlaviusAetius]

Talking about meta reasons why worcej is acting sus here, I generally think worcej is a smart fellow, in fact when I was scum in my last mafia game I took him out for that reason, he isn't acting very smart here, not good

Not only did he not read the setup correctly regarding MK's he ALSO parked two votes early on little evidence

I can’t stop reading this in Trump’s voice

TRUE
@worcej look at this its not just my misunderstanding of you only having max three votes, although the core of the argument is still true

[FlaviusAetius]

LOLOLOLOL

That (3) is referring to rule 3 dude.

Ok well I guess we are both wrong. Early voting still means you cant undo your vote and it parks it, making you have to advocate for that person. HOWEVER, its true you dont just have three votes TOTAL

I am not wrong - I knew my votes stuck after placing them.

I don’t feel bad about voting anyone here as every vote changes the “puzzle” for scum and forces action. Sitting around and just saying you think people are scummy and not exercising your power plays into the scum’s game here.

Also - YOU HAVE YET TO EXPLAIN WHY ME VOTING EARLY IS SCUMMY!!!!

IM not saying its SCUMMY, Im saying voting so many TIMES IS!

[worcej]

I think you implying I am coasting is what angered me to be a grump frump this morning because I have actually been the most engaged person here so far.

[FlaviusAetius]

Flavius,

Seriously your thoughts that I am coasting and that I am no longer able to vote are a hilariously bad misunderstanding and indicative of fundamentally not understanding the setup.

You owe me an apology for saying I am playing bad now

Ok but like its still a pretty bad move to vote early like that, ok its not AS BAD as I thought but still not GREAT

Bad does not equal scummy.

And, take this from me (who you think is smart): You have done nothing but laser focus on me, so if the slim chance you actually are town, you are playing far more badly than me, who has 4 actual scum reads and votes in place.

The only reason it SEEMS I am laser focusing in on you was because I ended the day voting you, I didnt mean to make my entire personality this game be anti-worcej I am only responding to you here because I like to respond to people live Im also catching up right now and I plan to vote others

[worcej]

Talking about meta reasons why worcej is acting sus here, I generally think worcej is a smart fellow, in fact when I was scum in my last mafia game I took him out for that reason, he isn't acting very smart here, not good

Not only did he not read the setup correctly regarding MK's he ALSO parked two votes early on little evidence

I can’t stop reading this in Trump’s voice

TRUE
@worcej look at this its not just my misunderstanding of you only having max three votes, although the core of the argument is still true

EXPLAIN WHY EARLY VOTES ARE SCUMMY!!!!