Is this the way you usually read the game? It seems to me that it would take less time to read through the thread instead of clicking on the bot person by person and tracking down 'why did she say THAT' to understand full context.Kitsune wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2019 8:24 pm@Dargdargorygel wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:58 pm@Kit
You mention on p 119 that you read the game while ‘busy’ by reading the bot. Why do you do that instead of scan the game?
If you must know, it’s a combination of two reasons and one more than the other.
1. I have scraps of time now and then to catch up on what I’ve missed but not to respond with properly thought out posts. I’ve seen enough people get tarred for showing up as actively viewing without posting (even though I feel this is a weak argument) that I’d prefer to avoid that for myself if possible.
2. I like the colours better and don’t get as confused about which person I don’t know except by reputation said what when everything they say is, for example, green.
I would be surprised if this is how you usually read the game. But I suppose it might be. It does not seem the most efficient, time friendly method.
More importantly, you would miss the train of thought. The magnificent progression of conversation.
I'm not just being concerned about you time management skills. But if you were me reading your statement about how you are reading this game, can you see how it would make me think you are not just busy... but busy AND coasting? It's the coasting that could indicate a scummy attitude... right?