MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Vaporwave
Posts: 2308
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:21 pm

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2141 Post by Vaporwave » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:40 pm

thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:35 pm
Vaporwave wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:23 pm
damo, agree that team might contain Ike, was looking back at bomb vs. Durga. vs Ike and it was a bit unusual

it might have been that he was more silent because bomb was a partner.

also, I know how bomb behaves as scum. He's smart enough not to spew 2 people town, only Durga comes out as town from this entire event

I'm entertaining the thought that Ike is indeed part of bomb's team.
What I found strange about that exchange is that brain chose to attack Durga in the first place. They have had issues in the past and from the last few times I've played with them, brain tends to be hyper-vigilant about not pissing off Durga (regardless of alignment) - though he's not very good at it. For scum brainbomb, what I find strange is that he chose to go after Durga. I could see him knowing Durga would look better from the exchange and he sacrificing himself. I could see it legitimately being a case of brain being defensive of his oog friend Ike and it being NAI. I have trouble seeing it being brain defending scummate Ike by attacking town Durga.
What your take on them? Do you think that Ike is rather town and Durga could be scum?

Her reaction made me feel she's in no way associated with bomb.

Why would she let bomb as partner do this charade where he pressed for her to apologize? Durga was patient enough but also firm in telling him he's milking the moment.

I feel like Ike was present,didn't interrupt the spat. He never called out bomb for buddying him even though during the argument bomb made an entire scene of Ike situation.

Vaporwave
Posts: 2308
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:21 pm

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2142 Post by Vaporwave » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:42 pm

Oh, not to mention that BOTH bomb and Ike started this game shading Durga, trying to get a reaction out of her since they've mentioned past animosities.

damo666
Posts: 20269
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2143 Post by damo666 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:44 pm

RagingIke297 wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:24 pm
Ezio wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:20 pm
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:11 pm


The only reason for me to suspect it's not auto-win is that scum have not conceded yet, but maybe it's just because they haven't had a chance to talk it among themselves.
We should absolutely execute the plan assuming it's auto win, but I don't want everyone to get complacent here.
Correct, if we get complacent we start thinking crazy things, like Xorxes is town
Is this serious?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2144 Post by worcej » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:44 pm

Nephthys wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:20 am
I just assumed we had a lot of 20-30 year olds, with the odd outside.
Guess I am one of the odd... only just barely though lol

damo666
Posts: 20269
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2145 Post by damo666 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:46 pm

worcej wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:44 pm
Nephthys wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:20 am
I just assumed we had a lot of 20-30 year olds, with the odd outside.
Guess I am one of the odd... only just barely though lol
Yep. You are odd.

(Joking worcej, joking)

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2146 Post by worcej » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:50 pm

Durga wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:02 am
You're married at 22? Wow. Now I'm feeling old and forever alone.
Oh god, I didn't get married until I was 27 so calm down :P

damo666
Posts: 20269
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2147 Post by damo666 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:50 pm

RagingIke297 wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 5:59 pm
Oooohhhhhhhhh boys, I'm fishing up a whopper of a whale of a tale, I just need to make sure the codes and usernames check out and I'll be back.... We're talking Tom Bombadil isn't the cop level tin foil here
What's this about?

damo666
Posts: 20269
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2148 Post by damo666 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:54 pm

RagingIke297 wrote:
Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:54 pm
Not going to be around at EON, will be sporadic, so reads now (no reasoning attached in post, just from what I remember because I'm lazy):

Strong Town: xorxes, worcej, Vecna
Weak Town: Durga, thamrick, Vaporwave, damo666, e.m.c^42, rdrivera2005
Null: Percy Williams, Tom Bombadil, Attorney, bozotheclown
Weak Scum: Nephthys, ND
Strong Scum: Ezio, flash2015, Foxcastle, Squigs44
This is looking poor

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2149 Post by worcej » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:56 pm

Vaporwave wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:42 pm
Oh, not to mention that BOTH bomb and Ike started this game shading Durga, trying to get a reaction out of her since they've mentioned past animosities.
This is fairly common - no offense to her, but she is easy to get roused up for reads.

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2150 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:56 pm

Vaporwave wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:40 pm
What your take on them? Do you think that Ike is rather town and Durga could be scum?

Her reaction made me feel she's in no way associated with bomb.

Why would she let bomb as partner do this charade where he pressed for her to apologize? Durga was patient enough but also firm in telling him he's milking the moment.

I feel like Ike was present,didn't interrupt the spat. He never called out bomb for buddying him even though during the argument bomb made an entire scene of Ike situation.
Right now I'm reading them both as mildly town. They're in my POE (mainly due to claiming con), but further down my POE than a few others. I'd probably say Durga is slightly more likely to be scum than Ike, but it's negligible.

I agree that Durga's reaction to BB in that exchange was very genuine. However, I think that her reaction would be genuine as either alignment. Durga is a good enough player to not be rattled by BB. The thing that gives me pause about Durga's interactions with BB is actually this post:
Durga wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:36 am
xorxes wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:35 am
She only has three votes with hardly any push so far, I don't see her in any danger of being lynched, why would that give you anxiety?
he's trying to buddy me because he's anxious i'll get him lynched
It was early D1 (p.33 if you want it in context). I agreed with it at the time because I was scumreading BB. However, it just seems a little too incisive to me on re-read.

I'll (begrudgingly) re-read the BB/Durga/Ike exchange again to see what you're saying about Ike. My gut during the exchange was that BB was just over being scum and that he was legitimately upset that Durga called Ike that.

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2151 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:58 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:54 pm
RagingIke297 wrote:
Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:54 pm
Not going to be around at EON, will be sporadic, so reads now (no reasoning attached in post, just from what I remember because I'm lazy):

Strong Town: xorxes, worcej, Vecna
Weak Town: Durga, thamrick, Vaporwave, damo666, e.m.c^42, rdrivera2005
Null: Percy Williams, Tom Bombadil, Attorney, bozotheclown
Weak Scum: Nephthys, ND
Strong Scum: Ezio, flash2015, Foxcastle, Squigs44
This is looking poor
Please explain what looks poor about it.

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2152 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:00 pm

Vaporwave wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:42 pm
Oh, not to mention that BOTH bomb and Ike started this game shading Durga, trying to get a reaction out of her since they've mentioned past animosities.
I don't remember bb shading Durga at the beginning. I actually remember him being mildly favorable towards Durga. Can you point to what you're remembering/reading?

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2153 Post by Squigs44 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:01 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 12:01 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:44 am
Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:39 am


If Attorney is conservative, and none of the town conservative lied about their party, then this game is autowin for us since we can lynch all of the conservatives before mafia can kill off the non-cons. So yes, we lynch Attorney, and it doesn't even matter if he lied or not.
The only downside to this plan is if Party cop is killed or RB'd tonight. But then we can always decide what to do with Attorney later.
Well, no. The downside of this plan is that Attorney is probably a non-conservative who lied. We mislynch him, he flips non-con and we are back to square one.

I do understand the math of it, but I think its unwise to let that dictate the day when there is a very good chance he is a non-con.
We only lynch him IF the party cop comes out with a Con or DUP scan on him. We don't ever lynch a non-con Attorney unless somehow the party cop can't scan him. If that's the case, we will cross that bridge when we get there.

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2154 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:02 pm

Someone else shaded Durga (worcej maybe? - the "I couldn't vote for her last game" line) early on. Is that what you're remembering?

damo666
Posts: 20269
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2155 Post by damo666 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:04 pm

thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:58 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:54 pm
RagingIke297 wrote:
Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:54 pm
Not going to be around at EON, will be sporadic, so reads now (no reasoning attached in post, just from what I remember because I'm lazy):

Strong Town: xorxes, worcej, Vecna
Weak Town: Durga, thamrick, Vaporwave, damo666, e.m.c^42, rdrivera2005
Null: Percy Williams, Tom Bombadil, Attorney, bozotheclown
Weak Scum: Nephthys, ND
Strong Scum: Ezio, flash2015, Foxcastle, Squigs44
This is looking poor
Please explain what looks poor about it.
the number of non-cons in his scum

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2156 Post by Squigs44 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:08 pm

Anyone scumreading Ike/Durga needs to provide a case that includes points outside of the brain exchange. Brain is a crafty guy who can smear people just how he wants, and so it becomes WIFOM.

damo666
Posts: 20269
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2157 Post by damo666 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:08 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:04 pm
thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:58 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:54 pm


This is looking poor
Please explain what looks poor about it.
the number of non-cons in his scum
and as it turns out having Ezio in there but Ezio hadn't PM claimed then so I forgive that one.

Actually would a scum Ike list like this? Perhaps not. I'll move him from scumlean to Null.

damo666
Posts: 20269
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2158 Post by damo666 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:09 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:08 pm
Anyone scumreading Ike/Durga needs to provide a case that includes points outside of the brain exchange. Brain is a crafty guy who can smear people just how he wants, and so it becomes WIFOM.
@Squigs who are your current scumpile?

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2159 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:11 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:04 pm
thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:58 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:54 pm


This is looking poor
Please explain what looks poor about it.
the number of non-cons in his scum
Why is that so terrible though? Between his slight scum and strong scum, he had 3 cons and 3 non-cons. There are 3 con mafia nd 1 non-con mafia.

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2160 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:12 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:08 pm
Anyone scumreading Ike/Durga needs to provide a case that includes points outside of the brain exchange. Brain is a crafty guy who can smear people just how he wants, and so it becomes WIFOM.
^this :clap:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], nx21