Hard disagree here. Pyxxy isn't right about shit here.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 1:41 ampyxxy was making the same basic argument before the end of day. curious how that works.worcej wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 1:37 amI'm sorry, but Pyxxy is the one that is throwing me shade DURING THE NIGHT PHASE, AFTER THE FACT, as if I did something wrong or bad.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 1:36 am
it means that you're using a post-facto knowledge base to argue against a course of action available in the moment before that knowledge was gained
So far, with known facts, he's fucked up more than I have.
i dispute that he fucked up because i firmly believe dousing was one of the worst possible votes there. bozo was a better vote given the information we had. was it the wrong call? yes. could you have reasonably done better with the information we had? not with rigor and with confidence. pyxxy was right
In the moment, bozo contributed far more than dousing had and dousing's contributions when I made that post were pathetic. I am much more inclined to scum read a relatively newish player doing fuck all on D1 because they could be floundering and waiting for coaching/counseling from scumchat.
Then to come at me for my vote now on N1 in the same manner, without consideration that I was ACTUALLY RIGHT ABOUT MY OPINION, as he did for voters on D1 shows a pathetic ability to adapt to new information. It feels like he's stuck on utilizing emotion-based posts that are hella easy to fake.