M1010 Mini-Mafia

[Jamiet99uk]

Hello, Bozotheclown.

Is it my turn to be tunnelled? Whoopee.

We have participated in one mislynch each.

I wrongly suspected BunnyGo. You were the principal driver of the Bo_Sox mislynch, it just took you two days.

Do you have any questions for me, regarding the lynch of BunnyGo, on D1? I will be happy to answer them.

I am not tunneling you yet, but you are in pool of players that I think could be scum.

Why did you unvote between changing your vote from bo_sox to BunnyGo?

You literally quoted me saying why I was unvoting.

But sure, I can expand.

I was on Bo_Sox. I really didn't like his earlier post where he said the GM could replace him. It was disrespectful to the entire spirit of the game. Really shitty. But then he stiffened up and started to care. Then I saw his earnest, detailed, forthright defence of himself and my spider-senses said "shit, I am on the wrong guy, here". So, the first thing I resolved to do was remove my vote. To make it clear, "I am not lynching this guy today".

Then, having made it clear I was removing my vote, I took some time to reconsider. On reconsidering, BunnyGo seemed very scummy to me, again, for the reasons I stated back then, and so that's where my vote went.

Does that answer your question?

[brainbomb]

its obvious to me rivera, bozo and fox are all town. ill follow whoever they wanna lynch

[Jamiet99uk]

@Bozo: And as for causing a tie, yes, I was aware I caused a tie by unvoting, but it wasn't going to remain a tie for long, because I wasn't going to waste my vote.

[xorxes]

DAY1

BunnyGo (5) kgray Foxcastle Jamiet99uk xorxes bo_sox48
bo_sox48 (2) rdrivera2005 bozotheclown
bozotheclown (2) BunnyGo worcej
worcej (2) brainbomb e.m.c^42
brainbomb (1) damo666
Foxcastle (1) SarahK24

DAY2

bo_sox48 (7) damo666* bozotheclown xorxes rdrivera2005 brainbomb* SarahK24 e.m.c^42
damo666 (4) Jamiet99uk Foxcastle bo_sox48 worcej

[brainbomb]

im not really bothered by jamie either

[bozotheclown]

Nonsense. Waiting for bo_sox to make it 4-3 instead of making it 4-2 myself is not better in any way. The final lynch is the same, and I have no certainty that bo_sox will move, whereas I have control of my move.

Did it concern you that BunnyGo was not online? What do you think of Jamie changing his vote to force the tie?

BunnyGo was my second choice and I had been scumreading him all day, so I was happy to lynch him. It did not concern me very much that he was (apparently) not there because when he last posted he was a strong lynch candidate and he did not say anything that made me think he could ba a worried PR. Also, I knew that he lurks as scum, so I was thinking he might be reading from the bot. So I would have preferred to lynch bo, but I was ok with Bunny.

Jamie's changing his vote did not strike me as terrible. All the people staying on side wagons was much worse.

When Jamie unvoted 7 minutes before EOD, the vote was bo_sox 3, BunnyGo 3, worcej 2, brainbomb 2, Foxcastle 1, so only SK24, who did not appear to be online, was on what I would call a side wagon. Who do you suspect for staying on a side wagon?

[brainbomb]

my scum reads are

damo
worcej
xorxes
emc
sarah

two in those are wrong obviously ^

[brainbomb]

jamie, bozo, rivera,fox help me here

[bozotheclown]

Hello, Bozotheclown.

Is it my turn to be tunnelled? Whoopee.

We have participated in one mislynch each.

I wrongly suspected BunnyGo. You were the principal driver of the Bo_Sox mislynch, it just took you two days.

Do you have any questions for me, regarding the lynch of BunnyGo, on D1? I will be happy to answer them.

I am not tunneling you yet, but you are in pool of players that I think could be scum.

Why did you unvote between changing your vote from bo_sox to BunnyGo?

You literally quoted me saying why I was unvoting.

But sure, I can expand.

I was on Bo_Sox. I really didn't like his earlier post where he said the GM could replace him. It was disrespectful to the entire spirit of the game. Really shitty. But then he stiffened up and started to care. Then I saw his earnest, detailed, forthright defence of himself and my spider-senses said "shit, I am on the wrong guy, here". So, the first thing I resolved to do was remove my vote. To make it clear, "I am not lynching this guy today".

Then, having made it clear I was removing my vote, I took some time to reconsider. On reconsidering, BunnyGo seemed very scummy to me, again, for the reasons I stated back then, and so that's where my vote went.

Does that answer your question?

Yes, but why did you need time to reconsider? Four minutes before you unvoted, you posted this:

Can we do people's vote preferences? Unless everyone not voting for bo actually wants bo lynched, we need to consolidate. Mine is:

Bunny > brain > worcej > bo > bozo

Bunny = Bo_Sox > Brainbomb > Foxcastle > Damo666

The = means I'd about equal on Bo and Bunny.

Who were you considering besides BunnyGo?

[Jamiet99uk]

Wait a minute, that's incorrect.

Bozo, you are remembering it wrong, and so am I, apparently. I had to double-check the bot.

It was not my *unvote* that caused a tie. It was my vote for BunnyGo that very briefly tied it.

Strange how I remembered it the other way round, just as you did. Huh.

[Jamiet99uk]

jamie, bozo, rivera,fox help me here

Hello.

How may I help?

[brainbomb]

jamie, bozo, rivera,fox help me here

Hello.

How may I help?

do you scumread xorx, damo, emc, sarah or worcej

do we have any common reads

[bozotheclown]

@Bozo: And as for causing a tie, yes, I was aware I caused a tie by unvoting, but it wasn't going to remain a tie for long, because I wasn't going to waste my vote.

The vote was not tied until you voted for BunnyGo.

[Jamiet99uk]

Who were you considering besides BunnyGo?

Primarily Brainbomb as I recall.

[bozotheclown]

Wait a minute, that's incorrect.

Bozo, you are remembering it wrong, and so am I, apparently. I had to double-check the bot.

It was not my *unvote* that caused a tie. It was my vote for BunnyGo that very briefly tied it.

Strange how I remembered it the other way round, just as you did. Huh.

I never said you caused a tie by unvoting.

[Jamiet99uk]

@Bozo: And as for causing a tie, yes, I was aware I caused a tie by unvoting, but it wasn't going to remain a tie for long, because I wasn't going to waste my vote.

The vote was not tied until you voted for BunnyGo.

I know I just corrected myself there. But I note that you got it wrong as well, so apparently an easy mistake to make.

[Jamiet99uk]

Wait a minute, that's incorrect.

Bozo, you are remembering it wrong, and so am I, apparently. I had to double-check the bot.

It was not my *unvote* that caused a tie. It was my vote for BunnyGo that very briefly tied it.

Strange how I remembered it the other way round, just as you did. Huh.

I never said you caused a tie by unvoting.

Yes you did, just now, look:

When Jamie unvoted 7 minutes before EOD, the vote was bo_sox 3, BunnyGo 3, worcej 2, brainbomb 2, Foxcastle 1, so only SK24, who did not appear to be online, was on what I would call a side wagon. Who do you suspect for staying on a side wagon?

It was only 3-3 after I put my vote on BunnyGo, not when I unvoted.

[bozotheclown]

@Bozo: And as for causing a tie, yes, I was aware I caused a tie by unvoting, but it wasn't going to remain a tie for long, because I wasn't going to waste my vote.

The vote was not tied until you voted for BunnyGo.

I know I just corrected myself there. But I note that you got it wrong as well, so apparently an easy mistake to make.

Where did I get that wrong? I said you caused a tie by changing your vote from bo_sox to BunnyGo. What I asked about was the unvote before voting for BunnyGo.

[xorxes]

DAY1

BunnyGo (5) kgray Foxcastle Jamiet99uk xorxes bo_sox48
bo_sox48 (2) rdrivera2005 bozotheclown
bozotheclown (2) BunnyGo worcej
worcej (2) brainbomb e.m.c^42
brainbomb (1) damo666
Foxcastle (1) SarahK24

DAY2

bo_sox48 (7) damo666* bozotheclown xorxes rdrivera2005 brainbomb* SarahK24 e.m.c^42
damo666 (4) Jamiet99uk Foxcastle bo_sox48 worcej

bozo and rivera were not there at EOD1 (they had anticipated they would not be). worcej and Sarah were not posting either. I don't think they announced they would not be there.

damo, brainbomb and emc stayed out of the main wagons.

Jamie and I were the only ones doing anything at EOD. Fox was on the lynching wagon but not so much by doing anything.

brainbomb is to me the most noticeable for being there but not really caring what happened.

[bozotheclown]

Wait a minute, that's incorrect.

Bozo, you are remembering it wrong, and so am I, apparently. I had to double-check the bot.

It was not my *unvote* that caused a tie. It was my vote for BunnyGo that very briefly tied it.

Strange how I remembered it the other way round, just as you did. Huh.

I never said you caused a tie by unvoting.

Yes you did, just now, look:

When Jamie unvoted 7 minutes before EOD, the vote was bo_sox 3, BunnyGo 3, worcej 2, brainbomb 2, Foxcastle 1, so only SK24, who did not appear to be online, was on what I would call a side wagon. Who do you suspect for staying on a side wagon?

It was only 3-3 after I put my vote on BunnyGo, not when I unvoted.

OK, thanks, that should have said after you voted for BunnyGo.