Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

[damo666]

1) I'm going from memory
2) I'm guessing there is at least one scum on the Chaqa wagon and I think the other voters more likely town. I only offered it uo because you asked me the question.

You think all other 4 scum are on Jamiet wagon? Or you think me and Foxcastle are scum?

My view of Damo is that he's being incredibly hedgy.

Examples please.

[ghug]

I'm getting strongly inclined to endhammer ghug tomorrow

Why?

[Bonatogether]

Nobody can tell the difference between a five-paragraph essay and a reads list, so that's not an excuse.

...? It's not an excuse cause it's a valid reason.

I am definitely advocating that anyone in school should drop out right now and only play WebDip mafia. That is my official position on the matter, yes.

What? I don't get what you've been saying

[Foxcastle]

You think all other 4 scum are on Jamiet wagon? Or you think me and Foxcastle are scum?

My view of Damo is that he's being incredibly hedgy.

Examples please.

I have no intention of checking, but when you're just going from memory and throwing names around without reason or explanation, you're not actually creating a record of thought, just the appearance of one.

[Jamiet99uk]

My view of Damo is that he's being incredibly hedgy.

Examples please.

I have no intention of checking, but when you're just going from memory and throwing names around without reason or explanation, you're not actually creating a record of thought, just the appearance of one.

That's not the same as being "hedgy".

[Foxcastle]

Examples please.

I have no intention of checking, but when you're just going from memory and throwing names around without reason or explanation, you're not actually creating a record of thought, just the appearance of one.

That's not the same as being "hedgy".

"Vague," "indecisive," "evasive," "elusive," etc etc etc in a way that is not helpful. Whatever you like.

[Jamiet99uk]

I have no intention of checking, but when you're just going from memory and throwing names around without reason or explanation, you're not actually creating a record of thought, just the appearance of one.

That's not the same as being "hedgy".

"Vague," "indecisive," "evasive," "elusive," etc etc etc in a way that is not helpful. Whatever you like.

Ok. "Hedgy" means something quite specific, involving making double-sided statements to give yourself an out later on.

Like "I think Foxcastle is probably scum but I've been wrong about him in the past so he might not be, but I'd still vote for him tomorrow". That's hedgy.

[damo666]

I have no intention of checking, but when you're just going from memory and throwing names around without reason or explanation, you're not actually creating a record of thought, just the appearance of one.

That's not the same as being "hedgy".

"Vague," "indecisive," "evasive," "elusive," etc etc etc in a way that is not helpful. Whatever you like.

Ok Ok No No

"Clueless" would be fair.

[Foxcastle]

That's not the same as being "hedgy".

"Vague," "indecisive," "evasive," "elusive," etc etc etc in a way that is not helpful. Whatever you like.

Ok. "Hedgy" means something quite specific, involving making double-sided statements to give yourself an out later on.

Like "I think Foxcastle is probably scum but I've been wrong about him in the past so he might not be, but I'd still vote for him tomorrow". That's hedgy.

Sure, whatever, I'm not interested in a semantics debate. The point is: Damo.

[jasnah]

@Bunny go

OK, I understand now. I'm glad you find assertion that this is a scum slip as unconvincing as it ought to be immediately dismissed to be. For those of Bona's disposition I'll be reminded in future to write out in full "if I were mafia with Bunny go et al, which of course I'm not but this is a hypothetical, then I and my totally hypothetical mafia partners would have to be terrible at the game to make the play that has been suggested I and my totally hypothetical mafia partners might make." A bit of a mouthful but I'm told that CYA is the name of the game.

@Ghug I'll respond shortly

[brainbomb]

Vecna feels like he just desperately wants to die

[brainbomb]

like oh ill push this person and hope they kill me
oh let me push this person and hope they kill me

It doesnt work that way nilsy

[brainbomb]

scum has to give a shit about you to kill you

[BunnyGo]

like oh ill push this person and hope they kill me
oh let me push this person and hope they kill me

It doesnt work that way nilsy

Why did you think to make this post?

[Jamiet99uk]

like oh ill push this person and hope they kill me
oh let me push this person and hope they kill me

It doesnt work that way nilsy

There's a conclusion you can draw there but I'm not going

[brainbomb]

my point was that what hes doing only works on a scumteam with a lack of courage. doesnt make him scum

[BunnyGo]

like oh ill push this person and hope they kill me
oh let me push this person and hope they kill me

It doesnt work that way nilsy

Why did you think to make this post?

OK...you're gone. It's a very very strange post. It says nothing about what you're concluding about Vecna and his reasons for posting it. It just says you feel something. And it's at best surface level. It's bad post.

[BunnyGo]

my point was that what hes doing only works on a scumteam with a lack of courage. doesnt make him scum

Then WHY SAY THAT?! Are *you* trying to get him NKed? What is the point?

[worcej]

If you think about mafia in hockey terms, scum always gets more shots on goal than town day 1. But as town you want to be on powerplays by day 3 or 4 and all shots on scum goal are devastating

What other ways can you compare mafia too?

[worcej]

As the GM have given me a second chance (thanks GM) I will post my read from the DK.

I suspect any vet player that pushed Chaqa's kill. Chaqa as scum lurks, buss all his team to win, use real life excuses and get caught, but don't do this kind of shenanigan. I can't believe players like Vecna, Jamiet and Brain really believe Chaqa was scum doing a weird play that will result in lot of pressure D2 just for the giggs. Ghug get a bit of a pass because he moved at the end when it was clearly between Chaqa and Jamiet.

That's were I would start tomorrow if I am alive.

I feel like there's a large contingent of us at this point who want to kill Chaqa for his bullshit in the hopes that he'll stop pulling his bullshit.

Yes, a game where town is probably the weakest faction seems a good moment to push a policy kill. I agree that it's a bullshit play (and told so), but there is no reason to push Chaqa's death on D1. Why aren't we policy lynching lurkers or people that didn't vote?

What faction are you most concerned with rdr?