Wow this came off really cocky. Sorry BK. Just madJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:16 amDon’t care. My plan is the most optimal until proven otherwise. Which it wont. So it doesn’t matter how long the night is.
M1027: Community - Game Thread
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
And I'm sorry for calling you a nitwit lolJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:17 amWow this came off really cocky. Sorry BK. Just madJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:16 amDon’t care. My plan is the most optimal until proven otherwise. Which it wont. So it doesn’t matter how long the night is.
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
I'm (supposed to be) prepping for an all day meeting tomorrow, and I'm out of commission for much of the next 21 hours. I really would have preferred the extra time. If it really is the best, it'll hold up after 2 days of analysis, just the same as 1 day. That's why I'm frustrated
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Do we have an established consensus for VT votes?
I didn’t see it yet. This needs to be established.
My 2cents here is it’s 6-2 and if we scan BK3K again and create 3 clears, because him and sweet are town, it’s pretty much auto.
If we scan BK3K and get a scan of someone and they are opposite, we flip BK3K and either know sweet is scum (and therefor win) or know he is town and the other person recently scanned is scum and it becomes a coin toss going into KiLo.
I think a different parity scan would not benefit us as much as going back to BK3K and possibly getting the 2-3 clears now.
I didn’t see it yet. This needs to be established.
My 2cents here is it’s 6-2 and if we scan BK3K again and create 3 clears, because him and sweet are town, it’s pretty much auto.
If we scan BK3K and get a scan of someone and they are opposite, we flip BK3K and either know sweet is scum (and therefor win) or know he is town and the other person recently scanned is scum and it becomes a coin toss going into KiLo.
I think a different parity scan would not benefit us as much as going back to BK3K and possibly getting the 2-3 clears now.
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Well the chance that the other person scanned is mafia is higher than the chance that sweet and BK are mafia, regardless of my intuition. So yes, we would scan BK and then kill the other if they are not all the same team.worcej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:24 amDo we have an established consensus for VT votes?
I didn’t see it yet. This needs to be established.
My 2cents here is it’s 6-2 and if we scan BK3K again and create 3 clears, because him and sweet are town, it’s pretty much auto.
If we scan BK3K and get a scan of someone and they are opposite, we flip BK3K and either know sweet is scum (and therefor win) or know he is town and the other person recently scanned is scum and it becomes a coin toss going into KiLo.
I think a different parity scan would not benefit us as much as going back to BK3K and possibly getting the 2-3 clears now.
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Meanwhile in the GT…
ghug: I cannot believe we approved this setup and turned the game into the most boring mechanics fest!
Darg: I trusted you ghug… you’re supposed to be the brains of this operation!
Eden: (continues to be absent and doing nothing)
ghug: I cannot believe we approved this setup and turned the game into the most boring mechanics fest!
Darg: I trusted you ghug… you’re supposed to be the brains of this operation!
Eden: (continues to be absent and doing nothing)
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
going to put my vote in for BK right now. I will be very active tmrw so I can change based on whatever.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:26 amWell the chance that the other person scanned is mafia is higher than the chance that sweet and BK are mafia, regardless of my intuition. So yes, we would scan BK and then kill the other if they are not all the same team.worcej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:24 amDo we have an established consensus for VT votes?
I didn’t see it yet. This needs to be established.
My 2cents here is it’s 6-2 and if we scan BK3K again and create 3 clears, because him and sweet are town, it’s pretty much auto.
If we scan BK3K and get a scan of someone and they are opposite, we flip BK3K and either know sweet is scum (and therefor win) or know he is town and the other person recently scanned is scum and it becomes a coin toss going into KiLo.
I think a different parity scan would not benefit us as much as going back to BK3K and possibly getting the 2-3 clears now.
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
This game is more interesting when it has baseless accusations and conspiracies.
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Yes, fair modification here. Kill the recent scan to confirm alignment of 2. If they are town, we win because they are scum and we have the votes to kill them.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:26 amWell the chance that the other person scanned is mafia is higher than the chance that sweet and BK are mafia, regardless of my intuition. So yes, we would scan BK and then kill the other if they are not all the same team.worcej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:24 amDo we have an established consensus for VT votes?
I didn’t see it yet. This needs to be established.
My 2cents here is it’s 6-2 and if we scan BK3K again and create 3 clears, because him and sweet are town, it’s pretty much auto.
If we scan BK3K and get a scan of someone and they are opposite, we flip BK3K and either know sweet is scum (and therefor win) or know he is town and the other person recently scanned is scum and it becomes a coin toss going into KiLo.
I think a different parity scan would not benefit us as much as going back to BK3K and possibly getting the 2-3 clears now.
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Thanks for coming to the party worcej. Now consider any edge cases before we blow ourselves up by accident. There is discussion on prior pages, if you ignore the yellingworcej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:28 amYes, fair modification here. Kill the recent scan to confirm alignment of 2. If they are town, we win because they are scum and we have the votes to kill them.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:26 amWell the chance that the other person scanned is mafia is higher than the chance that sweet and BK are mafia, regardless of my intuition. So yes, we would scan BK and then kill the other if they are not all the same team.worcej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:24 amDo we have an established consensus for VT votes?
I didn’t see it yet. This needs to be established.
My 2cents here is it’s 6-2 and if we scan BK3K again and create 3 clears, because him and sweet are town, it’s pretty much auto.
If we scan BK3K and get a scan of someone and they are opposite, we flip BK3K and either know sweet is scum (and therefor win) or know he is town and the other person recently scanned is scum and it becomes a coin toss going into KiLo.
I think a different parity scan would not benefit us as much as going back to BK3K and possibly getting the 2-3 clears now.
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
I now realize that the NK is probably going to be BK if he isn’t scum.BK3K wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:30 amThanks for coming to the party worcej. Now consider any edge cases before we blow ourselves up by accident. There is discussion on prior pages, if you ignore the yellingworcej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:28 amYes, fair modification here. Kill the recent scan to confirm alignment of 2. If they are town, we win because they are scum and we have the votes to kill them.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:26 am
Well the chance that the other person scanned is mafia is higher than the chance that sweet and BK are mafia, regardless of my intuition. So yes, we would scan BK and then kill the other if they are not all the same team.
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Oh you realize something after that fiasco?JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:31 amI now realize that the NK is probably going to be BK if he isn’t scum.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14307
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Will still has not explained his plan nor why he thinks I'm opposed to it.
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
I do.BK3K wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:33 amOh you realize something after that fiasco?JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:31 amI now realize that the NK is probably going to be BK if he isn’t scum.
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Plan is a few pages back.
I just assumed that calling me scummy in your head discredited my plan as something that mafia could get away with
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
I'm logging off for now. I cannot handle this lmaoJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:35 amI do.BK3K wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:33 amOh you realize something after that fiasco?JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:31 am
I now realize that the NK is probably going to be BK if he isn’t scum.
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
I think the vote for BK3K is the most optimum.
Let’s say we get another parity - use rdr and myself for an example. We learn that me and him are on a team while sweet and BK3K are on a team too. This doesn’t result in clear path forward, it just eliminates pairs and creates no clears. The best case is we get another pair of players that are opposite alignment - we’re more likely to get the rdr and me situation though…
We’re at a point where getting clears is immensely valuable and can auto this game.
Mathing again - next phase is 5-2…
If we “miss” and the scanned person is killed and then we know BK3K and sweet are scum - it’s 3-2 the next vote and we auto-win.
If we “hit” and the scanned person is scum, it comes down to 5-1 with 2 clears and possibly more scans to keep the chain going.
Let’s say we get another parity - use rdr and myself for an example. We learn that me and him are on a team while sweet and BK3K are on a team too. This doesn’t result in clear path forward, it just eliminates pairs and creates no clears. The best case is we get another pair of players that are opposite alignment - we’re more likely to get the rdr and me situation though…
We’re at a point where getting clears is immensely valuable and can auto this game.
Mathing again - next phase is 5-2…
If we “miss” and the scanned person is killed and then we know BK3K and sweet are scum - it’s 3-2 the next vote and we auto-win.
If we “hit” and the scanned person is scum, it comes down to 5-1 with 2 clears and possibly more scans to keep the chain going.
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
FWIW, it isn’t scummy to end the phase on a confirmed scum. Keep the momentum moving forward.heartthrob24909 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:54 amWorcej and Chaqa both cast end votes while implying that they had not read recent thread happenings. They set up an opportunity for ghug to seal the day.
^Would town still not know how to read the investigation results?
If the conversation you find important stops, that’s your fault not mine.
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Again. Welcome to the party. Where were you before the hammer?worcej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:38 amI think the vote for BK3K is the most optimum.
Let’s say we get another parity - use rdr and myself for an example. We learn that me and him are on a team while sweet and BK3K are on a team too. This doesn’t result in clear path forward, it just eliminates pairs and creates no clears. The best case is we get another pair of players that are opposite alignment - we’re more likely to get the rdr and me situation though…
We’re at a point where getting clears is immensely valuable and can auto this game.
Mathing again - next phase is 5-2…
If we “miss” and the scanned person is killed and then we know BK3K and sweet are scum - it’s 3-2 the next vote and we auto-win.
If we “hit” and the scanned person is scum, it comes down to 5-1 with 2 clears and possibly more scans to keep the chain going.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Jamiet99uk, Reaper Of The Dead, Spartaculous