Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

[ND]

-Snip-

CRUSADER
POSTED
BARELY
ANYTHING
HOW ARE YOU EVEN ON HIM?

Dude, if you cannot see why Cruaader's posts weren't scummy then I can't help you. Re-read him and my posts on him. What he did was very scum indicative. I have seen that stuff before in my time on this website. He was very clearly scum and when I see something like that I jump on it. His later posts simply confirmed my suspicions and I knew I had scum.

[ND]

Why do my posts keep getting stuck in quotes? fuck.

[Carl Tuckerson]

Like, literally the overview of his play has been scummy as hell. I've defended him on the "smart and experienced" and "list" points, and nobody else has looked at those in ages, certainly not the bulk of the wagon.

No it hasn't.

I'm starting to think you're mafia. You're just throwing shit out there now to see what sticks, and your brazen disregard for dargorygel's answer to your questions is striking.
Have you even followed up on the answers you've been given?

Didn't you just try to kill me?

Yeah and I backed off of that a bit because you were around for nightposting, which I consider slightly townie. But you're still not following up on the answers you got to your questions and your arguments for killing Flavius are bad.

[rdrivera2005]

Other than Neph, I'm thinking Chippe and Flav are good lynches.

I give up on MoscowFleet. If we lose bc he's scum I'm going to set someone on fire.

Damo needs to step up or die.

I need to reread peoples ISOs. Starting to lean scum on Foxy.

Why do you keep avoiding TrPrado, like your the only one who didnt park the vote on bozo that voted for me over TrPrado

Nope, I also voted you instead of Prado. I don't find both of you particularly scummy, but you are harder to read.

[TrPrado]

Jesus Christ that wasn't my point.
There is no meaningful distinction to me between the "Squigs's dude" bit and the "Balki is smart" bit. All of that shit was admittedly weird but not in the slightest bit alignment indicative and pales in comparison to the effort Flavius put together. Hanging on to that from the first hour of the game is suspicious to me when Flavius did so much more throughout the day and frankly put more effort into solving than most of the people voting for him.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Y'all are the experienced people right? How are you getting stuck on such inane bullshit?

I'd argue there's certainly some kind of decent distinction looking back on it. One is about how Flavius read the game, the other was about Flavius for some reason deciding he was going to stick to Squigs and follow him based on essentially nothing. He presumed Squigs to be truthful and took him at face value and defended him from every criticism.

[Carl Tuckerson]

Jesus Christ that wasn't my point.
There is no meaningful distinction to me between the "Squigs's dude" bit and the "Balki is smart" bit. All of that shit was admittedly weird but not in the slightest bit alignment indicative and pales in comparison to the effort Flavius put together. Hanging on to that from the first hour of the game is suspicious to me when Flavius did so much more throughout the day and frankly put more effort into solving than most of the people voting for him.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Y'all are the experienced people right? How are you getting stuck on such inane bullshit?

I'd argue there's certainly some kind of decent distinction looking back on it. One is about how Flavius read the game, the other was about Flavius for some reason deciding he was going to stick to Squigs and follow him based on essentially nothing. He presumed Squigs to be truthful and took him at face value and defended him from every criticism.

That's not mafia behavior.
Your continued pushing this terrible case on a clear townie is.

[TrPrado]

No it hasn't.

I'm starting to think you're mafia. You're just throwing shit out there now to see what sticks, and your brazen disregard for dargorygel's answer to your questions is striking.
Have you even followed up on the answers you've been given?

Didn't you just try to kill me?

Yeah and I backed off of that a bit because you were around for nightposting, which I consider slightly townie. But you're still not following up on the answers you got to your questions and your arguments for killing Flavius are bad.

I'm working on it. I asked a lot of questions and am putting my analysis in a single post.

[TrPrado]

Jesus Christ that wasn't my point.
There is no meaningful distinction to me between the "Squigs's dude" bit and the "Balki is smart" bit. All of that shit was admittedly weird but not in the slightest bit alignment indicative and pales in comparison to the effort Flavius put together. Hanging on to that from the first hour of the game is suspicious to me when Flavius did so much more throughout the day and frankly put more effort into solving than most of the people voting for him.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Y'all are the experienced people right? How are you getting stuck on such inane bullshit?

I'd argue there's certainly some kind of decent distinction looking back on it. One is about how Flavius read the game, the other was about Flavius for some reason deciding he was going to stick to Squigs and follow him based on essentially nothing. He presumed Squigs to be truthful and took him at face value and defended him from every criticism.

That's not mafia behavior.
Your continued pushing this terrible case on a clear townie is.

That's like, the opposite of true

[ChippeRock]

CRUSADER
POSTED
BARELY
ANYTHING
HOW ARE YOU EVEN ON HIM?

Dude, if you cannot see why Cruaader's posts weren't scummy then I can't help you. Re-read him and my posts on him. What he did was very scum indicative. I have seen that stuff before in my time on this website. He was very clearly scum and when I see something like that I jump on it. His later posts simply confirmed my suspicions and I knew I had scum.

It wasn't scum indicative until he revealed this was NOT his 1st game. You jumped the gun, and than used something revealed AFTER you made your read to back your read. While your read has a decent chance of being correct, that read was way too fucking early considering Cruaader was still known to us as a 1st time Mafia player. Very suspicious, and very scummy in my opinion.

[ChippeRock]

Dude, if you cannot see why Cruaader's posts weren't scummy then I can't help you. Re-read him and my posts on him. What he did was very scum indicative. I have seen that stuff before in my time on this website. He was very clearly scum and when I see something like that I jump on it. His later posts simply confirmed my suspicions and I knew I had scum.

It wasn't scum indicative until he revealed this was NOT his 1st game. You jumped the gun, and than used something revealed AFTER you made your read to back your read. While your read has a decent chance of being correct, that read was way too fucking early considering Cruaader was still known to us as a 1st time Mafia player. Very suspicious, and very scummy in my opinion.

Dude WTF did you do with these quotes?

[FlaviusAetius]

Point of fact: Teacon votes like a page after TrPrado. Chippie is trying to obscure this fact for some reason. It's weird. Also, no it was not evident where Cru was new or not on Page 49, just like it wasn't on Page 48.

Cruaader answers whether he is new or not on page 50 with: '"Im new in the sense that I haven't played mafia on this website at all, which means I don't know the context of 3/4 of the things you say. I'm not new in the sense that I know how to play mafia in general (the rules, how roles work, ect.)"

Then again confirms he isn't new with: "Let's just say I've had some realllly bad n1s recently" End of Page 50 and more later on next page.

HE ANSWERS THIS AFTER TEACON AND TRPRADO VOTE HIM IDIOT YOUR WHOLE PREMISE IS FAKE AF.

Yet, Chippie never questions Teacon, never focuses on him, doesn't care at all about Teacon.

WHY?

@Teacon: What do you think about this.

Probably because teacon became a non-point at this point
Why are you even bringing this up

[ND]

Carl:

“This is the exact post where I voted bozo and I explained why I did. Did you even read it?
I talked myself into thinking it was slightly better than a random shot in the dark which is how I usually view lurkers. I wanted to save Flavius who I was pretty sure was town.” (Carl)

Okay, yeah I saw that post. Yeah, I mean, I see where you voted Bozo on Page 66. You give a ‘reason’ but I don’t see how this somehow invalidates your previous list on Page 64?? Why wasn’t Bozo on that list? Just making a best guess based on the wagons? This is what I am confused about.


Chippie:

“If this quote (posted before teacon's vote) is not a clear fucking hint he's played Mafia before, than you're officially fucking dumb:”

Dude then you must be a straight up retard then because you say:

“How many Mafia games have you played than on other platforms?” (51)

“Until he states he has played other Mafia games, this doesn't disprove that he knows how to play Mafia based solely on the OP & the Internet.” (51)

“Cruaader, how many Mafia games have you played in your life (Face to Face or elsewhere on the Internet)??” (51)

Like it wasn’t clear to you as evident by 51. Stop being such a deceitful little shit Chippie. It’s so transparent.

Again, and fucking QUOTE ME people: WHY. DOES. CHIPPIE. NOT. FOCUS. ON. TEACON???

[ND]

Quote it again

“Until he states he has played other Mafia games, this doesn't disprove that he knows how to play Mafia based solely on the OP & the Internet.” (Chippie, 51)

AFTER TEACON's vote

AFTER

AFTER

CLEARLY something is wrong with Chippie here he is stuck in his own web of lies and obscuring the thread.

[FlaviusAetius]

Other than Neph, I'm thinking Chippe and Flav are good lynches.

I give up on MoscowFleet. If we lose bc he's scum I'm going to set someone on fire.

Damo needs to step up or die.

I need to reread peoples ISOs. Starting to lean scum on Foxy.

Why do you keep avoiding TrPrado, like your the only one who didnt park the vote on bozo that voted for me over TrPrado

Nope, I also voted you instead of Prado. I don't find both of you particularly scummy, but you are harder to read.

Ok so, in essence, you had no idea, thats great
At that point please put in a nonsense vote then, we could of killed TrPrado

[ND]

generally I hate using the word "clearly" I learned my lesson as an undergraduate with that word a long time ago, but I am throwing it that idiot's fucking face bcoz he loves to use it.

[FlaviusAetius]

Jesus Christ that wasn't my point.
There is no meaningful distinction to me between the "Squigs's dude" bit and the "Balki is smart" bit. All of that shit was admittedly weird but not in the slightest bit alignment indicative and pales in comparison to the effort Flavius put together. Hanging on to that from the first hour of the game is suspicious to me when Flavius did so much more throughout the day and frankly put more effort into solving than most of the people voting for him.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Y'all are the experienced people right? How are you getting stuck on such inane bullshit?

I'd argue there's certainly some kind of decent distinction looking back on it. One is about how Flavius read the game, the other was about Flavius for some reason deciding he was going to stick to Squigs and follow him based on essentially nothing. He presumed Squigs to be truthful and took him at face value and defended him from every criticism.

Thats it, when Squigs gets on Im asking him the link to the game the dude did this strategy to PROVE to you it was true
You are on this useless point and you really need to back off of it

[ChippeRock]

Quote it again

“Until he states he has played other Mafia games, this doesn't disprove that he knows how to play Mafia based solely on the OP & the Internet.” (Chippie, 51)

AFTER TEACON's vote

AFTER

AFTER

CLEARLY something is wrong with Chippie here he is stuck in his own web of lies and obscuring the thread.

Even though it was a clear hint, I wanted confirmation from the man himself. His statement could be interpreted vaguely and I wanted to know specifically how many games he played before. 2-3 is a big difference when reading someone than 39-40 games.

Don't be a damn hypocrite and call me deceitful.

[FlaviusAetius]

Carl:

“This is the exact post where I voted bozo and I explained why I did. Did you even read it?
I talked myself into thinking it was slightly better than a random shot in the dark which is how I usually view lurkers. I wanted to save Flavius who I was pretty sure was town.” (Carl)

Okay, yeah I saw that post. Yeah, I mean, I see where you voted Bozo on Page 66. You give a ‘reason’ but I don’t see how this somehow invalidates your previous list on Page 64?? Why wasn’t Bozo on that list? Just making a best guess based on the wagons? This is what I am confused about.


Chippie:

“If this quote (posted before teacon's vote) is not a clear fucking hint he's played Mafia before, than you're officially fucking dumb:”

Dude then you must be a straight up retard then because you say:

“How many Mafia games have you played than on other platforms?” (51)

“Until he states he has played other Mafia games, this doesn't disprove that he knows how to play Mafia based solely on the OP & the Internet.” (51)

“Cruaader, how many Mafia games have you played in your life (Face to Face or elsewhere on the Internet)??” (51)

Like it wasn’t clear to you as evident by 51. Stop being such a deceitful little shit Chippie. It’s so transparent.

Again, and fucking QUOTE ME people: WHY. DOES. CHIPPIE. NOT. FOCUS. ON. TEACON???

BECAUSE. TEACON. WAS. A. NON-POINT. EVENTUALLY, WHEN IT COMES TO THE END OF THE DAY YOU CANT JUST START ENTIRELY NEW WAGONS
WHY. ARE. YOU. STILL. ON. THIS.

[ND]

Quote it again

“Until he states he has played other Mafia games, this doesn't disprove that he knows how to play Mafia based solely on the OP & the Internet.” (Chippie, 51)

AFTER TEACON's vote

AFTER

AFTER

CLEARLY something is wrong with Chippie here he is stuck in his own web of lies and obscuring the thread.

Even though it was a clear hint, I wanted confirmation from the man himself. His statement could be interpreted vaguely and I wanted to know specifically how many games he played before. 2-3 is a big difference when reading someone than 39-40 games.

Don't be a damn hypocrite and call me deceitful.

Backpeddling now bitch hahahaha

Just stop being deceitful and obscuring the thread. You aren't fooling me or anyone else here. Your tactics are exposed and you have been called out.

Your probably scum, but also retarded. I intend to lead a lynch on you tomorrow or Cruaader's replacement. Imo Bozo's words are worth a lot.

[ND]

-snip-

BECAUSE. TEACON. WAS. A. NON-POINT. EVENTUALLY, WHEN IT COMES TO THE END OF THE DAY YOU CANT JUST START ENTIRELY NEW WAGONS
WHY. ARE. YOU. STILL. ON. THIS.

IDIOT! I never said Teacon should have been voted. I am asking CHIPPIE why HE NEVER FUCKING FOCUSED ON TEACON. HE SPENT ALL DAY FOCUSING ON ME AND TRPRADO FOR VOTING CRUAADER AND NEVER TEACON DESPITE

DESPITE

DESPITE

DESPITE

TEACON VOTING AT THE SAME TIME ME AND TRPRADO VOTED FOR CRUAADER

IS THAT CLEAR FOR YOU MORON?