Mafia 41 - Sid Meiers Civilizaton Mafia - Official Game Thread

[LordQuas]

Ok, why, in your PhD super expert lord of mafia opinion, was Squigs townreading you so hard then?

He was probably trying to pocket me, he seemed to have a penchant for townreading all the other high posting players you called town

btw do you have that quote where I parked a vote and anchored yet? Still waiting

[CrimsonFox]

Demon do you actually have an opinion about anyone

[DemonRHK]

And I did quote where you parked your vote on Squigs. You were present the whole time, and made sure to move it to damo before you left (when you were 'showing' Crimson how to vote), which is quite similar to what to did today when you went from me to unvote to Foxy to damo in three consecutive posts today.

[DemonRHK]

Since looking two pages back is hard:

Page 4:

Doubtful any newb scum would make the entrance Lord Quas made.

Why are ghug and ND in this game? All ghug ever does is piss on other people and scum read them based on the way it splashes. And all ND ever does is... wait, does ND ever do anything?

Jamiet99uk is being his normal self where he acts all self righteous and then gets offended when someone votes him.

This game is boring. Someone do something exciting please.

##Vote Squigs

blammo toodles 3p

Then the very next vote made in the game on page 6, some 4 hours later:

how do i vote

##Vote [Player name or close enough]

i.e.
##Vote damo666

[LordQuas]

And I did quote where you parked your vote on Squigs. You were present the whole time, and made sure to move it to damo before you left (when you were 'showing' Crimson how to vote), which is quite similar to what to did today when you went from me to unvote to Foxy to damo in three consecutive posts today.

t h a t ' s n o t p a r k i n g

You literally said I was there the whole time and moved it before I left dude LMFAO

and you're just saying shit I did in hopes ppl think it's scummy now lmaooo

[DemonRHK]

Fox is extremely likely scum.

One of Neph or Quas is scum, and I'm relatively certain it's Quas.

One of the deep lurks: Gnome, flash, or damo is likely scum.

Crimson is softcleared, I'm still town on Jamie, but I haven't gone on a full hunt for the SK yet.

[DemonRHK]

You're desperately trying to spin facts. You'd be right at home with ND.

It could have just as likely been a play for early towncred. You have a place to point back to that you voted for scum at one point, while leaving the context open to 'just a joke bro'. You even made sure to move it before you logged off for the night to ensure you'd avoid bus claims if the wagon formed when you weren't around.

The fact you seem so off-put but this style of play is strange, to be honest. Much of this is straight from the Brainbomb playbook.

[LordQuas]

You're desperately trying to spin facts. You'd be right at home with ND.

It could have just as likely been a play for early towncred. You have a place to point back to that you voted for scum at one point, while leaving the context open to 'just a joke bro'. You even made sure to move it before you logged off for the night to ensure you'd avoid bus claims if the wagon formed when you weren't around.

The fact you seem so off-put but this style of play is strange, to be honest. Much of this is straight from the Brainbomb playbook.

look I know you're probably gonna be like "see I gottem he's dodging"

but honestly I wrote a big thing out and deleted it cause you're so deep in a tunnel that nothing anyone says would ever change your mind

so enjoy being wrong

[DemonRHK]

I'd be very open to factual information as to why I'm wrong.

Every counterpoint you've had however has been a handwave or pushing your glasses up the bridge of your nose with ann "Um, actually..." explanation how I'm not using the exact to the letter mafia/Websters definition of a term.

Why did ya camp a vote on Squigs for four and a half hours only to change it, without explanation, to damo?

OTHER than setting a red herring, why would Squigs mass upvote in the way he did?

What is your analysis of Squigs' EoD1 reads?

[DemonRHK]

Again, this should all be nothing new to you. This is bread and butter Brainbomb. Shit, this is nothing to some of the brain level therories I’ve seen. Why has this irritated you so much?

[LordQuas]

I'd be very open to factual information as to why I'm wrong.

Every counterpoint you've had however has been a handwave or pushing your glasses up the bridge of your nose with ann "Um, actually..." explanation how I'm not using the exact to the letter mafia/Websters definition of a term.

Why did ya camp a vote on Squigs for four and a half hours only to change it, without explanation, to damo?

OTHER than setting a red herring, why would Squigs mass upvote in the way he did?

What is your analysis of Squigs' EoD1 reads?

my reason for voting damo is all there

[DemonRHK]

Your entire case on damo was he went from voting for Jamie to with Jamie.

[DemonRHK]

Like, that was it. Last post on it was 16 to EoD for D1, then you said you needed to reread him (what little there was) 8 hours into day two, then told Crimson you needed another opinion on his 41 posts 18 hours after that.

[Jamiet99uk]

Wow. CrimsonFox posts and posts and posts and yet still doesn't want to answer me.

[Jamiet99uk]

@CrimsonFox:

I have asked you a question, several times.

Please would you address it?

[LordQuas]

Your entire case on damo was he went from voting for Jamie to with Jamie.

yeah and that's mildly sus imo? shows a lack of committal to his reads

you literally tried to use the same point against me in your endlessly long tunnel

[LordQuas]

Like, that was it. Last post on it was 16 to EoD for D1, then you said you needed to reread him (what little there was) 8 hours into day two, then told Crimson you needed another opinion on his 41 posts 18 hours after that.

I don't want to clutter up the thread so here's direct links to all the times I mention my read on damo, some evolution of it, etc etc, and these were just the ones I found with ctrl+f "damo" in my iso

http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 200#p51200
http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 203#p51203
http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 367#p51367
http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 507#p51507

and here's that quote of me asking cfox for help after he asked what he should do
http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 954#p52954

the first quote should be all you need, I posted it before I voted damo, there's no possible way you could have missed it

[LordQuas]

I also had a huge debate with neph when he was discrediting my push on damo in the same way, I think it took up a sizable chunk of a few pages, don't know how you could have missed that either

[LordQuas]

Sorry for light posting. Today again gonna be difficult.

I am against mass claiThanks Worcej


##vote bozo. This is a park vote jic I don't get back

just like to point out he's parking a vote again

[DemonRHK]

I made points, laid out connections to scum.

Your entire case, now on Day 3, is he was hedgey. On day 1. 12 hours into the game.

I already looked at every time you mentioned him.

(Copied not quoted)
Day 1

Post 1: "Damo has this weird progression from voting Jamie because he's put in effort (and jamie demanding a stronger reason cause he always reads rules blah blah) into sheeping him instantly after on ND"

Post 2: "jamie and damo have super high w/w equity with damo's awk sheep and the RVS start of game vote from jamie onto damo"

Post 3: "well not his first post only, what was wolfy was him voting jamie and then instantly swapping around and sheeping him for no reason once he was asked to explain his entrance. Also he hasn't really done anything else, he's just parked his vote there"

Post 4: (Here you cover for damo & ghug, saying you think they were joke votes)

Post 5: "first read is a meh" (In reference to Ike's townlean on damo)

Posts 1-3 are all for the same single event. Post 4 hedges him. Post 5 is pure filler.

Not saying damo can't be scum, and I'm not going to argue his case for him, but you have to see how there is a difference between the two cases.

You had a conversation without ever bringing up or quoting the name of the person the entire dialogue is about? I would have to look for that later.