Re: 20 Questions - Round 127
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:31 pm
You know, I guess I over-reacted. Sometimes this website triggers me in a weird way, and you're right that's my problem, not anyone else's.
I apologise.
I apologise.
https://www.webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/
https://www.webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4842
Jamie, Jamie, Jamie, what are we going to do with you?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:31 pmYou know, I guess I over-reacted. Sometimes this website triggers me in a weird way, and you're right that's my problem, not anyone else's.
I apologise.
Well in that case, I hate you Jamie, lets argue, I need a gift card too ya know lol.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 1:31 pmDon't encourage me. My apology to Foxcastle is genuine.
I will also be sending him a $25 gift certificate to spend at https://www.zombo.com
Thanks, I appreciate the perspective. I don't know much about her beyond Uncle Tom's Cabin and her literary reputation, and the Wikipedia article on her is written in a way that doesn't overtly tie her work to politics. TIL!BrianBaru wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:44 pmA view from the States: To suggest that Harriet Beecher Stowe was not involved in politics would be equivalent to saying that Rush Limbaugh was not involved in politics. Newspapers were the public forum of the day (= talk radio & podcasts) and she met with President Lincoln after the start of the Civil War.