Team chess: game 3

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
damo666
Posts: 20266
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#141 Post by damo666 » Sat Mar 22, 2025 6:11 pm

Spartaculous wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 5:38 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 5:29 pm
I vote resign.
I think that's two votes to resign. We could either see if more votes come in, or we could simply play out the rest of the game rather quickly (it shouldn't take long).
Would have to be e4 wouldn't it? Else ++

damo666
Posts: 20266
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#142 Post by damo666 » Sat Mar 22, 2025 6:14 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 6:11 pm
Spartaculous wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 5:38 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 5:29 pm
I vote resign.
I think that's two votes to resign. We could either see if more votes come in, or we could simply play out the rest of the game rather quickly (it shouldn't take long).
Would have to be e4 wouldn't it? Else ++
And white still has forced mate.

Deffo resign.

Aristocrat
Posts: 1981
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#143 Post by Aristocrat » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:00 pm

I have no idea if the analyzer I’m using is correct, but it viewed both the first and last moves in this sequence as severe blunders:

13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7

I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later

User avatar
Spartaculous
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#144 Post by Spartaculous » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:17 pm

I think, as the organizer of the game, it is best to simply call it, as white has forced checkmate in at most 2 more moves (24... Qd8 prolongs the game the longest, but still loses to 25. Qxh6+ Kg4 26. Qh3#).

I saved the game as a Lichess study: https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
Aristocrat wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:00 pm
I have no idea if the analyzer I’m using is correct, but it viewed both the first and last moves in this sequence as severe blunders:

13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7

I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later
Well, I am bemused to know that the computer thinks that my sacrifice (I was the one who played 13. Bxh7+) was a blunder!

miminena
Posts: 1975
Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 10:24 pm
Location: Behind you :3
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#145 Post by miminena » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:25 pm

Spartaculous wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:17 pm
I think, as the organizer of the game, it is best to simply call it, as white has forced checkmate in at most 2 more moves (24... Qd8 prolongs the game the longest, but still loses to 25. Qxh6+ Kg4 26. Qh3#).

I saved the game as a Lichess study: https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
Aristocrat wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:00 pm
I have no idea if the analyzer I’m using is correct, but it viewed both the first and last moves in this sequence as severe blunders:

13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7

I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later
Well, I am bemused to know that the computer thinks that my sacrifice (I was the one who played 13. Bxh7+) was a blunder!
what was the point behind the sacrifice? I assume there was one but I can't figure it out :p
Quoth the Penguin, "Noot Noot"

User avatar
Spartaculous
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#146 Post by Spartaculous » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:34 pm

miminena wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:25 pm
Spartaculous wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:17 pm
Well, I am bemused to know that the computer thinks that my sacrifice (I was the one who played 13. Bxh7+) was a blunder!
what was the point behind the sacrifice? I assume there was one but I can't figure it out :p
Well, the point of the sac was basically what happened in the game: White gets to play Ng5+ and Qh5 in very quick succession, and busts up Black's kingside. I felt that White would not be worse after the sac - there was a good chance of either winning an exchange back (as happened in the game) to establish rough material equality or getting a perpetual check as a worst-case scenario. It also just made the game much more interesting!

I am starting to put some of my thoughts as annotations in the Lichess study above.

Aristocrat
Posts: 1981
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#147 Post by Aristocrat » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:35 pm

Spartaculous wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:17 pm
I think, as the organizer of the game, it is best to simply call it, as white has forced checkmate in at most 2 more moves (24... Qd8 prolongs the game the longest, but still loses to 25. Qxh6+ Kg4 26. Qh3#).

I saved the game as a Lichess study: https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
Aristocrat wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:00 pm
I have no idea if the analyzer I’m using is correct, but it viewed both the first and last moves in this sequence as severe blunders:

13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7

I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later
Well, I am bemused to know that the computer thinks that my sacrifice (I was the one who played 13. Bxh7+) was a blunder!
I looked at two engines and both had the best white could do as being a stalemate after that, if black had made an offensive move like qb5 instead of bd7

User avatar
Spartaculous
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#148 Post by Spartaculous » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:42 pm

Mimi, I added you to the Lichess study, in case you want to add any of your own thoughts as annotations. (And I'm happy to do the same for anyone else with a Lichess account.)

miminena
Posts: 1975
Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 10:24 pm
Location: Behind you :3
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#149 Post by miminena » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:49 pm

Spartaculous wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:42 pm
Mimi, I added you to the Lichess study, in case you want to add any of your own thoughts as annotations. (And I'm happy to do the same for anyone else with a Lichess account.)
i saw! just wanted to wait for you to finish your analysis :)
Quoth the Penguin, "Noot Noot"

User avatar
Spartaculous
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#150 Post by Spartaculous » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:51 pm

miminena wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:49 pm
Spartaculous wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:42 pm
Mimi, I added you to the Lichess study, in case you want to add any of your own thoughts as annotations. (And I'm happy to do the same for anyone else with a Lichess account.)
i saw! just wanted to wait for you to finish your analysis :)
I'll be working on it off and on, so feel free to go ahead and add whatever you want.

miminena
Posts: 1975
Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 10:24 pm
Location: Behind you :3
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#151 Post by miminena » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:52 pm

also, i would like to point out the tragedy of the rook on a1, the only rook not to move this game. i think the canonical ending after Qxg7 should include Rb1 just as a homage to DT :3
Quoth the Penguin, "Noot Noot"

User avatar
Spartaculous
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#152 Post by Spartaculous » Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:59 pm

miminena wrote:
Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:52 pm
also, i would like to point out the tragedy of the rook on a1, the only rook not to move this game. i think the canonical ending after Qxg7 should include Rb1 just as a homage to DT :3
Actually, after ... Qd8, 25. 0-0-0 (with the intention of Rh1) is mate in only 1 additional move. (Also, see the first Team Chess game for a similar joke.)

User avatar
Spartaculous
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#153 Post by Spartaculous » Sat Mar 22, 2025 10:20 pm

Okay, I think I am done with my annotations. Good game everyone! I enjoyed it.

https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd

Trigfea63
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2021 11:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#154 Post by Trigfea63 » Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:39 am

I started replaying the game on your lichess link. At move 6, doesn't white win the bishop with Qa4+? I've been doing a lot of lichess puzzles lately and that is a recurring one.

If another team chess game is in the works, I'd love to join. (I'm an average player.)

miminena
Posts: 1975
Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 10:24 pm
Location: Behind you :3
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#155 Post by miminena » Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:45 am

Trigfea63 wrote:
Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:39 am
I started replaying the game on your lichess link. At move 6, doesn't white win the bishop with Qa4+? I've been doing a lot of lichess puzzles lately and that is a recurring one.

If another team chess game is in the works, I'd love to join. (I'm an average player.)
Nc6 blocks the check and defends the bishop
Quoth the Penguin, "Noot Noot"

User avatar
Spartaculous
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#156 Post by Spartaculous » Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:47 am

Trigfea63 wrote:
Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:39 am
If another team chess game is in the works, I'd love to join. (I'm an average player.)
If someone wants to organize round 4 of team chess, I'd be happy to play (though I would defer to someone else for the organization). Also, see miminena's post to set up a chess tournament; I'm also happy to play 1-day-per-move correspondence games on Lichess if you challenge me.

Trigfea63
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2021 11:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Team chess: game 3

#157 Post by Trigfea63 » Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:53 am

miminena wrote:
Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:45 am
Trigfea63 wrote:
Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:39 am
I started replaying the game on your lichess link. At move 6, doesn't white win the bishop with Qa4+? I've been doing a lot of lichess puzzles lately and that is a recurring one.

If another team chess game is in the works, I'd love to join. (I'm an average player.)
Nc6 blocks the check and defends the bishop
Yes, you're right. I see your comment in the lichess commentary :-) After ... Nc6, white could play Bb5 and the knight is pinned, but I guess black could just retreat the bishop at that point.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users