Would have to be e4 wouldn't it? Else ++Spartaculous wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 5:38 pmI think that's two votes to resign. We could either see if more votes come in, or we could simply play out the rest of the game rather quickly (it shouldn't take long).
Team chess: game 3
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: Team chess: game 3
Re: Team chess: game 3
And white still has forced mate.damo666 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 6:11 pmWould have to be e4 wouldn't it? Else ++Spartaculous wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 5:38 pmI think that's two votes to resign. We could either see if more votes come in, or we could simply play out the rest of the game rather quickly (it shouldn't take long).
Deffo resign.
-
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
I have no idea if the analyzer I’m using is correct, but it viewed both the first and last moves in this sequence as severe blunders:
13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7
I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later
13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7
I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later
- Spartaculous
- Posts: 3412
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
I think, as the organizer of the game, it is best to simply call it, as white has forced checkmate in at most 2 more moves (24... Qd8 prolongs the game the longest, but still loses to 25. Qxh6+ Kg4 26. Qh3#).
I saved the game as a Lichess study: https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
I saved the game as a Lichess study: https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
Well, I am bemused to know that the computer thinks that my sacrifice (I was the one who played 13. Bxh7+) was a blunder!Aristocrat wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:00 pmI have no idea if the analyzer I’m using is correct, but it viewed both the first and last moves in this sequence as severe blunders:
13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7
I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later
Re: Team chess: game 3
what was the point behind the sacrifice? I assume there was one but I can't figure it out :pSpartaculous wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:17 pmI think, as the organizer of the game, it is best to simply call it, as white has forced checkmate in at most 2 more moves (24... Qd8 prolongs the game the longest, but still loses to 25. Qxh6+ Kg4 26. Qh3#).
I saved the game as a Lichess study: https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
Well, I am bemused to know that the computer thinks that my sacrifice (I was the one who played 13. Bxh7+) was a blunder!Aristocrat wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:00 pmI have no idea if the analyzer I’m using is correct, but it viewed both the first and last moves in this sequence as severe blunders:
13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7
I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later
Quoth the Penguin, "Noot Noot"
- Spartaculous
- Posts: 3412
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
Well, the point of the sac was basically what happened in the game: White gets to play Ng5+ and Qh5 in very quick succession, and busts up Black's kingside. I felt that White would not be worse after the sac - there was a good chance of either winning an exchange back (as happened in the game) to establish rough material equality or getting a perpetual check as a worst-case scenario. It also just made the game much more interesting!miminena wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:25 pmwhat was the point behind the sacrifice? I assume there was one but I can't figure it out :pSpartaculous wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:17 pmWell, I am bemused to know that the computer thinks that my sacrifice (I was the one who played 13. Bxh7+) was a blunder!
I am starting to put some of my thoughts as annotations in the Lichess study above.
-
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
I looked at two engines and both had the best white could do as being a stalemate after that, if black had made an offensive move like qb5 instead of bd7Spartaculous wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:17 pmI think, as the organizer of the game, it is best to simply call it, as white has forced checkmate in at most 2 more moves (24... Qd8 prolongs the game the longest, but still loses to 25. Qxh6+ Kg4 26. Qh3#).
I saved the game as a Lichess study: https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
Well, I am bemused to know that the computer thinks that my sacrifice (I was the one who played 13. Bxh7+) was a blunder!Aristocrat wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:00 pmI have no idea if the analyzer I’m using is correct, but it viewed both the first and last moves in this sequence as severe blunders:
13. Bxh7+ Kxh7
14. Ng5+ Kg8
15. Qh5 Bd7
I am a relative novice at chess but I thought it was interesting that white had a slow but steadily increasing advantage all game until then, and black surrendered back its gains with a relatively innocuous move 2 turns later
- Spartaculous
- Posts: 3412
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
Mimi, I added you to the Lichess study, in case you want to add any of your own thoughts as annotations. (And I'm happy to do the same for anyone else with a Lichess account.)
Re: Team chess: game 3
i saw! just wanted to wait for you to finish your analysis :)Spartaculous wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:42 pmMimi, I added you to the Lichess study, in case you want to add any of your own thoughts as annotations. (And I'm happy to do the same for anyone else with a Lichess account.)
Quoth the Penguin, "Noot Noot"
- Spartaculous
- Posts: 3412
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
I'll be working on it off and on, so feel free to go ahead and add whatever you want.miminena wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:49 pmi saw! just wanted to wait for you to finish your analysis :)Spartaculous wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:42 pmMimi, I added you to the Lichess study, in case you want to add any of your own thoughts as annotations. (And I'm happy to do the same for anyone else with a Lichess account.)
Re: Team chess: game 3
also, i would like to point out the tragedy of the rook on a1, the only rook not to move this game. i think the canonical ending after Qxg7 should include Rb1 just as a homage to DT :3
Quoth the Penguin, "Noot Noot"
- Spartaculous
- Posts: 3412
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
Actually, after ... Qd8, 25. 0-0-0 (with the intention of Rh1) is mate in only 1 additional move. (Also, see the first Team Chess game for a similar joke.)
- Spartaculous
- Posts: 3412
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
Okay, I think I am done with my annotations. Good game everyone! I enjoyed it.
https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
https://lichess.org/study/3RSdT7xp/9itmhtTd
Re: Team chess: game 3
I started replaying the game on your lichess link. At move 6, doesn't white win the bishop with Qa4+? I've been doing a lot of lichess puzzles lately and that is a recurring one.
If another team chess game is in the works, I'd love to join. (I'm an average player.)
If another team chess game is in the works, I'd love to join. (I'm an average player.)
Re: Team chess: game 3
Nc6 blocks the check and defends the bishopTrigfea63 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:39 amI started replaying the game on your lichess link. At move 6, doesn't white win the bishop with Qa4+? I've been doing a lot of lichess puzzles lately and that is a recurring one.
If another team chess game is in the works, I'd love to join. (I'm an average player.)
Quoth the Penguin, "Noot Noot"
- Spartaculous
- Posts: 3412
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Team chess: game 3
If someone wants to organize round 4 of team chess, I'd be happy to play (though I would defer to someone else for the organization). Also, see miminena's post to set up a chess tournament; I'm also happy to play 1-day-per-move correspondence games on Lichess if you challenge me.
Re: Team chess: game 3
Yes, you're right. I see your comment in the lichess commentarymiminena wrote: ↑Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:45 amNc6 blocks the check and defends the bishopTrigfea63 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:39 amI started replaying the game on your lichess link. At move 6, doesn't white win the bishop with Qa4+? I've been doing a lot of lichess puzzles lately and that is a recurring one.
If another team chess game is in the works, I'd love to join. (I'm an average player.)

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users