Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4149
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#341 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:04 pm

sweetandcool wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:54 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:43 pm
Vecna wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 8:25 am


Sort of surprising that Bozo did not just default to 1 = first name alphabetically.

Which is Balki.

Why the focus on these 2 specifically Bozo?
Assuming sweetandcool did not want to vote for himself, 1-34 would make sense if that were the case, but not 1-32.

Why do assume sweetandcool did not ignore the number selection and vote for who he wanted to vote for? I was not in M87, but based on the D1 and D2 voting, it seems sweetandcool might be motivated to vote for Balki. Or, sweetandcool and Balki could be mafia teammates and the apparently random vote could be a distancing ploy.
Honestly the answer is that I had it in my head that there were 16 players not 18. I then multiplied by 2 to vaguely disguise my intention to use Will as RNG. I chose Will because he was online and active in thread.

Given that there was no prechat, it's hard to believe scum sweetandcool somehow coordinated with scum Will to fabricate a vote on Balki.

Conclusion:

1. NAI sweetandcool did an RNG bit.
2. Scum sweetandcool wanted an interaction with Will either as buddying or pretend buddying.
3. Any alignment sweetandcool did not fabricate a vote on Balki because that is ludicrously implausible.

I can certify that at least two of those conclusions are correct.
Ah I see

Honestly valid except why would you count yourself? Or did you think there was 17 and you didn’t include yourself

sweetandcool
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#342 Post by sweetandcool » Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:04 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:00 pm
sweetandcool wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:54 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:43 pm


Assuming sweetandcool did not want to vote for himself, 1-34 would make sense if that were the case, but not 1-32.

Why do assume sweetandcool did not ignore the number selection and vote for who he wanted to vote for? I was not in M87, but based on the D1 and D2 voting, it seems sweetandcool might be motivated to vote for Balki. Or, sweetandcool and Balki could be mafia teammates and the apparently random vote could be a distancing ploy.
Honestly the answer is that I had it in my head that there were 16 players not 18. I then multiplied by 2 to vaguely disguise my intention to use Will as RNG. I chose Will because he was online and active in thread.

Given that there was no prechat, it's hard to believe scum sweetandcool somehow coordinated with scum Will to fabricate a vote on Balki.

Conclusion:

1. NAI sweetandcool did an RNG bit.
2. Scum sweetandcool wanted an interaction with Will either as buddying or pretend buddying.
3. Any alignment sweetandcool did not fabricate a vote on Balki because that is ludicrously implausible.

I can certify that at least two of those conclusions are correct.
I didn't suggest that you might be mafia with Just.
Not in that post, but previously you made posts that suggested that you were suspicious of the possibility that Will and I were scummates.

If I am incorrect then I apologize for misconstruing what you have said.

What do you think of ghug so far, Bozo?

sweetandcool
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#343 Post by sweetandcool » Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:05 pm

JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:04 pm
sweetandcool wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:54 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:43 pm


Assuming sweetandcool did not want to vote for himself, 1-34 would make sense if that were the case, but not 1-32.

Why do assume sweetandcool did not ignore the number selection and vote for who he wanted to vote for? I was not in M87, but based on the D1 and D2 voting, it seems sweetandcool might be motivated to vote for Balki. Or, sweetandcool and Balki could be mafia teammates and the apparently random vote could be a distancing ploy.
Honestly the answer is that I had it in my head that there were 16 players not 18. I then multiplied by 2 to vaguely disguise my intention to use Will as RNG. I chose Will because he was online and active in thread.

Given that there was no prechat, it's hard to believe scum sweetandcool somehow coordinated with scum Will to fabricate a vote on Balki.

Conclusion:

1. NAI sweetandcool did an RNG bit.
2. Scum sweetandcool wanted an interaction with Will either as buddying or pretend buddying.
3. Any alignment sweetandcool did not fabricate a vote on Balki because that is ludicrously implausible.

I can certify that at least two of those conclusions are correct.
Ah I see

Honestly valid except why would you count yourself? Or did you think there was 17 and you didn’t include yourself
I am content to RNG vote myself.

bozotheclown
Posts: 12913
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#344 Post by bozotheclown » Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:37 pm

sweetandcool wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:04 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:00 pm
sweetandcool wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:54 pm


Honestly the answer is that I had it in my head that there were 16 players not 18. I then multiplied by 2 to vaguely disguise my intention to use Will as RNG. I chose Will because he was online and active in thread.

Given that there was no prechat, it's hard to believe scum sweetandcool somehow coordinated with scum Will to fabricate a vote on Balki.

Conclusion:

1. NAI sweetandcool did an RNG bit.
2. Scum sweetandcool wanted an interaction with Will either as buddying or pretend buddying.
3. Any alignment sweetandcool did not fabricate a vote on Balki because that is ludicrously implausible.

I can certify that at least two of those conclusions are correct.
I didn't suggest that you might be mafia with Just.
Not in that post, but previously you made posts that suggested that you were suspicious of the possibility that Will and I were scummates.

If I am incorrect then I apologize for misconstruing what you have said.

What do you think of ghug so far, Bozo?
I don't have a significant opinion on his alignment yet.

sweetandcool
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#345 Post by sweetandcool » Wed May 01, 2024 12:00 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:37 pm
sweetandcool wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:04 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:00 pm


I didn't suggest that you might be mafia with Just.
Not in that post, but previously you made posts that suggested that you were suspicious of the possibility that Will and I were scummates.

If I am incorrect then I apologize for misconstruing what you have said.

What do you think of ghug so far, Bozo?
I don't have a significant opinion on his alignment yet.
What do you think of me so far? I want to know if I am successfully buddying you and others.

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9341
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#346 Post by Bonatogether » Wed May 01, 2024 12:02 am

sweetandcool wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:54 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:43 pm
Vecna wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 8:25 am


Sort of surprising that Bozo did not just default to 1 = first name alphabetically.

Which is Balki.

Why the focus on these 2 specifically Bozo?
Assuming sweetandcool did not want to vote for himself, 1-34 would make sense if that were the case, but not 1-32.

Why do assume sweetandcool did not ignore the number selection and vote for who he wanted to vote for? I was not in M87, but based on the D1 and D2 voting, it seems sweetandcool might be motivated to vote for Balki. Or, sweetandcool and Balki could be mafia teammates and the apparently random vote could be a distancing ploy.
Honestly the answer is that I had it in my head that there were 16 players not 18. I then multiplied by 2 to vaguely disguise my intention to use Will as RNG. I chose Will because he was online and active in thread.

Given that there was no prechat, it's hard to believe scum sweetandcool somehow coordinated with scum Will to fabricate a vote on Balki.

Conclusion:

1. NAI sweetandcool did an RNG bit.
2. Scum sweetandcool wanted an interaction with Will either as buddying or pretend buddying.
3. Any alignment sweetandcool did not fabricate a vote on Balki because that is ludicrously implausible.

I can certify that at least two of those conclusions are correct.
##vote sweetandcool

did not wait to think of something normal to say

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4149
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#347 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Wed May 01, 2024 12:18 am

##VOTE BONA
IMG_0952.jpeg


sweetandcool
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#349 Post by sweetandcool » Wed May 01, 2024 12:24 am

Bonatogether wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:20 am
loser
Eh, that upset you? Why?

sweetandcool
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#350 Post by sweetandcool » Wed May 01, 2024 12:27 am

JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:18 am
##VOTE BONA

IMG_0952.jpeg
This is the creepiest pic I have seen.

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9341
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#351 Post by Bonatogether » Wed May 01, 2024 12:29 am

sweetandcool wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:24 am
Bonatogether wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:20 am
loser
Eh, that upset you? Why?
it looked stupid

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4149
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#352 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Wed May 01, 2024 12:53 am

Bonatogether wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:29 am
sweetandcool wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:24 am
Bonatogether wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:20 am
loser
Eh, that upset you? Why?
it looked stupid
Is this all you have to say about it

sweetandcool
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#353 Post by sweetandcool » Wed May 01, 2024 1:02 am

JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:53 am
Bonatogether wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:29 am
sweetandcool wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:24 am


Eh, that upset you? Why?
it looked stupid
Is this all you have to say about it
I think it's better if we saw nothing more about it.


Now Will, please, talk about something, someone. Even Bona. What's burning in that noggin of yours?

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4149
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#354 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Wed May 01, 2024 1:06 am

sweetandcool wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 1:02 am
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:53 am
Bonatogether wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:29 am

it looked stupid
Is this all you have to say about it
I think it's better if we saw nothing more about it.


Now Will, please, talk about something, someone. Even Bona. What's burning in that noggin of yours?
Now i dont have any proof for this but Bona seems to be doing his ‘too cool for mafia routine’. I dont know who said it or when (maybe it was during his MU champs game or maybe brain) but people have said this is a telltale sign of scum bona.

Now its just a theory but i think im onto something

Plus he hasn’t significantly contributed even tho his post count is relatively high, so theres another thing

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4149
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#355 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Wed May 01, 2024 1:07 am

Sweet also why asking me all these questions

Is it just cuz im the most active participant here

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4149
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#356 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Wed May 01, 2024 1:08 am

JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 1:06 am
sweetandcool wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 1:02 am
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 12:53 am


Is this all you have to say about it
I think it's better if we saw nothing more about it.


Now Will, please, talk about something, someone. Even Bona. What's burning in that noggin of yours?
Now i dont have any proof for this but Bona seems to be doing his ‘too cool for mafia routine’. I dont know who said it or when (maybe it was during his MU champs game or maybe brain) but people have said this is a telltale sign of scum bona.

Now its just a theory but i think im onto something

Plus he hasn’t significantly contributed even tho his post count is relatively high, so theres another thing
If there are any certified bona experts who are willing to fuel my suspicions, i would be more than happy to hear from you

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4422
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#357 Post by Hamilton Brian » Wed May 01, 2024 1:09 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 9:09 pm

Ghug might be your friend, but how convinced are you that he is definitely your team mate?

(Or, did the GM already tell you that?)
I think this is the most compelling post I've read all game.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4422
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#358 Post by Hamilton Brian » Wed May 01, 2024 1:09 am

That's a Jamie tete et tete with Balki that might merit some looking at as the game progresses.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4422
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#359 Post by Hamilton Brian » Wed May 01, 2024 1:11 am

foodcoats wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 9:23 pm
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 8:33 pm
Hm bona feels weird. Idk what ‘not weird’ would constitute for Bona but something feels wrong
I’m trying to remember if bona was always this obstinately unhelpful with a dash of satirical poetry. I think he was.
Thanks for labelling it for me; couldn't ever really find the right words to describe what I felt.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4422
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 88: Murder at the Meadery - GAME THREAD

#360 Post by Hamilton Brian » Wed May 01, 2024 1:13 am

foodcoats wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 9:28 pm
Balki Bartokomous wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 9:23 pm
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 9:16 pm


I think the funniest thing is that to make this, Jamie had to type into his computer: ‘Big Buff Man in Maid Costume Lingerie’
No. Had he done that, he'd have shared an image of someone in a maid outfit. This is clearly butler porn that Jamiet had on his hard drive.

No judgments here.
It’s starting to get weird in here. Should we just hammer one of the new guys?

##VOTE LordOfWords

##END
That's kind of scummy of you. Why'd you decide that was the right way to go, food? Dashes that image I have of you.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], brainbomb, foodcoats, Google [Bot], Hominidae, Kakarroto, nickoso, sweetandcool