M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22988
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Karma: 10196
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#221 Post by brainbomb » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:32 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:29 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 7:14 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 9:06 am


Ghug, you silly old space cube.

Did you deliberately post this vote in an invalid format, or did you not realise?
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 9:08 am
I agree with Ghug that mech talk today is a suboptimal topic of conversation.

Who is giving good vibes? Who is giving bad vibes? Who is trying to fly under the radar? These sorts of things should be in our minds.
@Jamie, your first post above, asks ghug if he deliberately voted in an invalid format

one post later you ask about who is giving bad vibes, and trying to fly under the radar.

If you were sincerely curious about if ghug was using a invalid vote on will, would that fit the criteria of trying to fly under the radar? and would that also fulfil the bad vibes?

It seems like you gave this a pass without ghug even answering you
Fuck you. I am allowed to ask Ghug a question whilst also agreeing with something else he said.

There is no dichotomy here.
So you dont think ghug did a ##vote will to fly under the radar or for any evil purpose whatsoever?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18616
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#222 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:32 pm

Diplomacy&Warfare wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 8:01 pm
I am once again reminded of how generally insane mafia players on this forum are. 10 pages in ~20 hours.
That is a relatively low volume for Mafia over here.
This signature is hard to read in dark mode.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22988
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Karma: 10196
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#223 Post by brainbomb » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:33 pm

Rather than trying to take the detour on every question I ask you maybe you could try just answering the actual questions as opposed to telling me im putting words in your mouth.

Direct straightforward answers would be great.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18616
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#224 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:34 pm

Diplomacy&Warfare wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:00 pm
So, as far as I can tell, Jamiet said there were 7 people, brain said no, there's 9, and Jamiet concluded that brain is scum.
Where did I say Brain was scum?

Point to the post.

Quote it.

I did not say that.

Fucking fool. Try reading.
This signature is hard to read in dark mode.

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4027
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Karma: 866
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#225 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:34 pm

Obligatory- 2 of sweet/Jamie/ brain/ Will argument.

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4027
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Karma: 866
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#226 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:34 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:34 pm
Diplomacy&Warfare wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:00 pm
So, as far as I can tell, Jamiet said there were 7 people, brain said no, there's 9, and Jamiet concluded that brain is scum.
Where did I say Brain was scum?

Point to the post.

Quote it.

I did not say that.

Fucking fool. Try reading.
Woah hey now

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18616
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#227 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:35 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:31 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:12 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:52 pm
Aren't you normally much more wary, and cognizant of Jamie's slips, gaffes and failures to be consistent?

Why are you giving a free pass to that here?

this post is @ ghug
I did not slip, I did it on purpose, as I have stated.
Right and ghug believes you did it on purpose when you clearly did not. And I am asking ghug here why he buys your explanations. And he also answered this already.
Yes I did.

I did it on purpose. As I have repeatedly stated.

You are wrong.
This signature is hard to read in dark mode.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18263
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11573
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#228 Post by ghug » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:36 pm

Diplomacy&Warfare wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:21 pm
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:13 pm
Ghug also seems slighly off lol
Ghug does seem off but not enough to vote them out. Copscan?
What would be "on" from me, in your eyes?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18616
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#229 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:37 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:32 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:29 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 7:14 pm

@Jamie, your first post above, asks ghug if he deliberately voted in an invalid format

one post later you ask about who is giving bad vibes, and trying to fly under the radar.

If you were sincerely curious about if ghug was using a invalid vote on will, would that fit the criteria of trying to fly under the radar? and would that also fulfil the bad vibes?

It seems like you gave this a pass without ghug even answering you
Fuck you. I am allowed to ask Ghug a question whilst also agreeing with something else he said.

There is no dichotomy here.
So you dont think ghug did a ##vote will to fly under the radar or for any evil purpose whatsoever?
I am not sure.

Ghug is hard to read D1. Sometimes he likes to fuck about. Perplexingly, sometimes, he does not fuck about so much. This is NAI for D1 Ghuggles.
This signature is hard to read in dark mode.

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 4027
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Karma: 866
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#230 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:37 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:36 pm
Diplomacy&Warfare wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:21 pm
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:13 pm
Ghug also seems slighly off lol
Ghug does seem off but not enough to vote them out. Copscan?
What would be "on" from me, in your eyes?
Ima be honest, no freaking clue, its just a vibe honestly

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18263
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11573
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#231 Post by ghug » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:37 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:27 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 6:37 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:52 pm
Aren't you normally much more wary, and cognizant of Jamie's slips, gaffes and failures to be consistent?

Why are you giving a free pass to that here?

this post is @ ghug
I don't think that's an accurate assessment of how I read Jamie. I think he's a good scum player who isn't especially prone to those sorts of mistakes. It's more tone, motive, and emotion that I look for to read Jamie.

I think he's more likely to be scum here than you or Will, but more because he provoked y'all with the seven thing and then was very level-headed in responding. My mind immediately jumped to the conclusion that he was being silly when he made the seven comment. I think y'all are making a mountain out of a molehill.
I did not make a FUCKING MISTAKE.
I'm talking about the sorts of mistakes brain is describing, which I don't think you made here.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18616
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#232 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:38 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:33 pm
Rather than trying to take the detour on every question I ask you maybe you could try just answering the actual questions as opposed to telling me im putting words in your mouth.

Direct straightforward answers would be great.
Is this directed at me?

I have addressed everything of relevance that you have asked me, and you have repeatedly called me a liar when I am stating the truth.

Shove it up your ass.
This signature is hard to read in dark mode.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18263
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11573
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#233 Post by ghug » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:39 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:31 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:12 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:52 pm
Aren't you normally much more wary, and cognizant of Jamie's slips, gaffes and failures to be consistent?

Why are you giving a free pass to that here?

this post is @ ghug
I did not slip, I did it on purpose, as I have stated.
Right and ghug believes you did it on purpose when you clearly did not. And I am asking ghug here why he buys your explanations. And he also answered this already.
Brain, I thought he was doing it on purpose before I read any responses to it. That you and Will didn't pick up on it doesn't change the fact that it was obvious.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18616
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#234 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:39 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:37 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:27 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 6:37 pm

I don't think that's an accurate assessment of how I read Jamie. I think he's a good scum player who isn't especially prone to those sorts of mistakes. It's more tone, motive, and emotion that I look for to read Jamie.

I think he's more likely to be scum here than you or Will, but more because he provoked y'all with the seven thing and then was very level-headed in responding. My mind immediately jumped to the conclusion that he was being silly when he made the seven comment. I think y'all are making a mountain out of a molehill.
I did not make a FUCKING MISTAKE.
I'm talking about the sorts of mistakes brain is describing, which I don't think you made here.
My only mistake was to post at all in D1 of a game which also contains Brainbomb in this kind of stupid mood.

Fuck all of this shit.
This signature is hard to read in dark mode.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18263
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11573
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#235 Post by ghug » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:40 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:34 pm
Diplomacy&Warfare wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:00 pm
So, as far as I can tell, Jamiet said there were 7 people, brain said no, there's 9, and Jamiet concluded that brain is scum.
Where did I say Brain was scum?

Point to the post.

Quote it.

I did not say that.

Fucking fool. Try reading.
Can we tone it down a tad, Jimbozig?
1

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18616
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#236 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:40 pm

Brainbomb has absolutely derailed D1 of this game, as fucking usual.

##Vote Jamiet99uk
##End.

There. Is that what everyone fucking wants?

Good. I'll die. Enjoy it. Dicks.
This signature is hard to read in dark mode.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18616
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#237 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:41 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:40 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:34 pm
Diplomacy&Warfare wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:00 pm
So, as far as I can tell, Jamiet said there were 7 people, brain said no, there's 9, and Jamiet concluded that brain is scum.
Where did I say Brain was scum?

Point to the post.

Quote it.

I did not say that.

Fucking fool. Try reading.
Can we tone it down a tad, Jimbozig?
Sure. I'm not going to post again for a few hours. I am tired of being jumped on D1 because of nothing.
This signature is hard to read in dark mode.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22988
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Karma: 10196
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#238 Post by brainbomb » Fri Mar 08, 2024 12:01 am

Ghug, your opinion on current events?

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22988
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Karma: 10196
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#239 Post by brainbomb » Fri Mar 08, 2024 12:03 am

##End

Calling the bluff
1

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18263
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11573
Contact:

Re: M1028: The Sweet Food Consensus - Game Thread

#240 Post by ghug » Fri Mar 08, 2024 12:08 am

brainbomb wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2024 12:01 am
Ghug, your opinion on current events?
Is "irritated" an opinion?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], Bonatogether, Hominidae, JustAGuyNamedWill, Spartaculous and 637 guests