21 Jan 24 UTC | Spring, 4: GameMaster: Game was extended due to at least 1 member failing to enter orders and having an excused missed turn available. This has un-readied all orders. |
15 Feb 24 UTC | Very well played Carthage! |
15 Feb 24 UTC | @Greece - just wondering (for my own future reference) - what made you decide to focus your attention on preventing my expansion but keep destroying units on your West? |
15 Feb 24 UTC | I don't think it necessarily ensured Carthage won the game (Carthage definitely played well) but it certainly slowed me down! |
15 Feb 24 UTC | Well played Carthage. Very clever in withholding your draw vote when it got down to the 3 of us and I was still leading... making your ally, Egypt, assume that I was the one holding up the draw & going for the solo instead of you. @Egypt - the answer to your question and the way Carthage won the game are probably one & the same: He took advantage of the inherent lack of communication in gunboat. At the moment that Persia/Rome were eliminated, I put in my draw vote (despite leading with something like 13 SCs) because I had a terrible defensive position against both of you guys and knew that I'd never get to 18 SCs. I figured I would be the last one to enter a draw vote... boy was I surprised & annoyed when I was proven wrong lol. So I had 2 choices to try to alert you (Egypt) that it was Carthage and not I that was refusing to draw and was the solo threat. 1. I could've backed away from you and given up my 6-7 of SCs in Asia Minor/Middle East. 2. I could back away from my borders with Carthage to attempt to send the message that I'd throw the game if Egypt didn't defend against Carthage and stop attacking me. I clearly made the wrong decision and apologize for that. After 1000+ mostly gunboat games, the various signals come naturally to me, but that's not universally true. I calculated that I could delay Carthage for about 5 years (but not indefinitely) from breaking through. I was hoping that Egypt would understand by then that since he was slowly growing while I was shrinking, the writing was on the wall. But it was only in the 6th or 7th year that Egypt turned west; and since you both attacked each other at the same time, it was too late to form the stalemate lines by then. |
15 Feb 24 UTC | Very interesting analysis, thanks for sharing that Greece |
15 Feb 24 UTC | Not sure if you noticed but there was one year I had 2 builds and decided to withhold one till I had more and had a better position against Carthage - I shouldn’t have withheld and gone up against him earlier on before it was too late |
15 Feb 24 UTC | Indeed pretty much the order you’re talking about - maybe 2 years before Carthage and I turned on each other at the same time, I’d had that opportunity. That would have been a better time (but for all I know thrown the game to you @Greevce!) |
15 Feb 24 UTC | Fun one for sure |
15 Feb 24 UTC | Yup, agreed. If I were playing as Egypt in this game, I would've assumed the exact same thing as you did - "since Greece was (at the time) leading the game, he must be the one refusing to draw and trying to solo." |
15 Feb 24 UTC | Yup I definitely had my draw vote in for a long time, pretty much solidly until I managed to make some gains against you and started feeling more confident... |
16 Feb 24 UTC | Great game everyone! Greece you were in a tough spot having secured a strong early lead but no mid-game allies. Egypt - I had closely considered pushing off a draw but as things developed, the solo became visible and I decided to go for it |
16 Feb 24 UTC | pushing for* a draw |