22 Mar 12 UTC | Spring, 1: Who wants to party in Athens? |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 1: You guys gotta be kidding - Ive nvr seen such a suss opening in a supposedly anon no private chat game |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 1: OK not anon - but at least TRY not to act suspicious |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 1: haha ya rome and Greece just happen to go in complete opp directions |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 1: And I accidently moved my fleet north. Wish I didn't do that. And in most games I've played, Persia is Greece's main enemy and Carthage is Rome's |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 1: If Carthage and Egypt are publicly accusing Rome and Greece of cheating here (and it sure sounds like you are) you are violating rule II. 4 of the site rules. -"All accusations against other players must be made directly to the mod/admin team directly as specified below, in private..." The reason for this is obvious. You can be using such an accusation to rally the other players against us Technically admin should be made aware of your violation, but let's just let it be, ok? Or if you really think we're cheating, then follow the rules and contact admin in private according to the rule. |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 1: So Rome, how should we settle the two territories between us? Or should we just leave them empty and decide what to do with them later. At the moment, I plan on sending the entirety of my forces east |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 1: Actually, I apologize to Carthage. He started after the first move and there sounds like he may be accusing Egypt of being in on the conspiracy against him.. Anyway, folks, just chill and realize that there is no reason, other than us making one variation of logical moves, to suspect anything. If you do think there is something nefarious, as I said, just ask the admin to investigate. But meanwhile, you do realize you could actually be 'forcing' Greece and I into a self-protective alliance with your barely veiled accusations, don't you? That's another good reason to make accusations to admin in private. |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 1: I'd like Vind for the build.. Dal, when you want it, and anything east of that is Greek to me, You see, you guys have created a self-fulfilling prophesy. |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Spring, 2: Thats alot of words Rome - methinks thou dost protest too much |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Spring, 2: Also Egypt - looks liek Persia contrary to the natural order of things is going to have a crack at you given his unit organisation. Given Rome has already stated and his unit organisation is arranged at me - why not ally and go hard against our mutual antagonists? |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Spring, 2: Persia, what are you doing? Are you just asking for me to wipe you out? You built two fleets to fight Egypt? I'm moving in closer to you and you aren't even trying to stop me |
22 Mar 12 UTC | Spring, 2: "Cathago delenda est". Cato the Elder had that figured out. |
23 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 2: This persian confuses me so |
23 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 2: None of us are rational or we would be doing something else with our time. LOL |
23 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 2: yes lets leave each other alone and work against our enemies |
23 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 2: and who might our enemies be? |
23 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 2: who ever makes an aggressive move towards me |
23 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 2: Rome has no quarrel with Egypt, Persia, or Greece. Rome is only at war with the warmonger Hannibal. If the Carthaginians will lay down their arms, send us Hannibal's head, and tithe ten percent their gold and silver each year; we'll simply install a Roman governor and our nations will be at peace. Pax Romanae vobiscum. |
23 Mar 12 UTC | Autumn, 2: Rome has no quarrel with Egypt, Persia, or Greece. Rome is only at war with the warmonger Hannibal. If the Carthaginians will lay down their arms, send us Hannibal's head, and tithe ten percent their gold and silver each year; we'll simply install a Roman governor and our nations will be at peace. Pax Romanae vobiscum. |